ISSN : 1229-0696
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of rating format(Likert, Behavioral description rating format) and scale type(balanced scale, positively unbalanced scale) on leniency error and halo effect in 360° feedback. The competency scale developed to appraise the job performance of employees in a large Korean company was administered to a sample of 440 raters who are composed of oneself, supervisor, subordinate, and peer. The raters of four groups rated the level of 133 ratees on thirty core competencies of the company through the 5-point scale. The results of 22 ANOVA and degree of skewness analysis indicated that positively unbalanced scale showed less leniency than the conventional measure of balanced scale, while there was no effect of rating format. Furthermore, the results of analyses of both standard deviation and correlation demonstrated that Behavioral description rating was more effective in reducing halo effect than Likert scale format. However, no scale effect was found since the two analyses of standard deviation and correlation produced inconsistent results. Finally, the limitations and future direction of the present study were discussed.
김명소, (1992) 심리검사 제작의 이론과 실제:척도화 방법, 1992년 한국심리학회 학술대회 발표집
김판석, (1999) 다면평가제 사례연구: 신화와 실상, 1999년도 하계학술대회
문화일보, (2007) <사설>고위공무원단 실험 1년과 하나마나한 직무평가. 7월 28일자,
이규만 ; 박경규, (2001) 부하의 체면중시가 상사-부하간 교환관계 및 조직행동에 미친 영향, 경영학 연구
박영석, (2003) 리더십 다면평가에서 나타난 평가자 조망.한국심리학회지, 산업 및 조직
양진환, (1999) 인사고과의 조작적 정의에 대한 평정정확성, 강남대학교 논문집
이승계, (2005) 다면평가제도의 실효성에 관한 연구, 대한경영학회지
이종구, (2001) SAS와 통계자료분석, 학지사
임창희, (1999) 360도 다면평가, 21세기 북스
장재윤, (1999) 연구개발 관리자에 대한 다면평가의 일치도 및 수행과의 관계, 산업 및 조직
중앙인사위원회 (2003). 다면평가 운영관련 유의사항,
한영석, (2007) 9개 리더십 역량이 성과평가에 미치는 영향, 007년 한국 산업 및 조직 심리학회 추계학술대회 및 심포지움 발표집
Bernardin, H. J., (1984) Performance appraisal: Assessing human behavior at work, Kent
Bernardin, H. J., (1977) Effect of rater training and diary-keeping on psychometric error in rating, Journal of Applied Psychology
Bernardin, H. J., (1976) A recomparison of behavioral expectation scales to summated scales, Journal of Applied Psychology
Bernardin, H. J., (1976) Behavioral expectation scales: Effects of development procedures and format, Journal of Applied Psychology
Bretz, Jr., R. D., (1992) The current state of performance appraisal research and practice: Concerns , directions and implications, Journal of Management
Campbell, J. D., (1990) Self-esteem and perceptions of conveyed impression: Is negative affectivity associated with greater realism, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Chruch, A. H, (1995) First-rate multi-rater feedback, Training and Development
Cooper,W.H, (1981) Ubiquitous halo.Psychological, Psychological Bulletin
Decotiis, T. A, (1977) An analysis of the external validity and applied relevance of three rating formats, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance
Dickinson, T. L., (1977) The discriminant validity of scales developed by retranslation, Personnel Psychology
Feldman,J.M, (1981) Beyond attribution theory: Cognitive processes in performance appraisal, Journal of Applied Psychology
Finley, D. M., (1977) Behaviorally based rating scales: Effects of specific anchors and disguised scale continua, Personnel Psychology
Firedman, B. A., (1976) Effect of rater participation in scale construction on the psychometric characteristics of two rating scale format, Journal of Applied Psychology
Friedman. H. H., (1981) Label versus position in rating scales, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
Fisicaro, S. A, (1988) A re-examination of the relation between halo error and accuracy, Journal of Applied Psychology
Fox, S., (1994) Variables affecting leniency, halo and validity of self-appraisal, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Friedman, H. H., (1999) Rating the rating scales, The Journal of Marketing Management
Harris, M. M, (1994) Rater motivation in the performance appraisal context: A theoretical framework, Journal of Management
Harris,M.M., (1988) A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer and peer-supervisor ratings, Personnel Psychology
Jeffrey, S. K., (1995) Stability of Rater Leniency: Three Studies, The Academy of Management Journal
Jones, L., (2002) Self-assessment in a selection situation: An evaluation of different measurement approaches, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Kasten, R., (1999) Rating errors and rating accuracy: A field experiment, Human Performance
Keaveny, T. J., (1975) A comparison of behavioral expectation scales and graphic rating scales, Journal of Applied Psychology
Landy. F. J., (1976) Behaviorally anchored scales for rating the performance of police officers, Journal of Applied Psychology
Latham,G.P., (1981) Increasing productivity through performance appraisal, Addison-Wesley Company
Levy, P. E., (1998) Reactions to appraisal discrepancies: Performance ratings and attributions, Journal of Business and Psychology
Longenecker,C.O., (1987) Behind the mask:The politics of employee appraisal.Academy of Management, Academy of Management Executive
Mount, M. K, (1984) Psychometric properties of subordinate ratings of managerial performance, Personnel Psychology
Mikovich,G.T.,&?Boudreau.J.W, (1994) Human Resource Management(7th ed.), Irwin.
Motowidlo, S. J., (1977) Behaviorally anchored scales for measuring morale in military units, Journal of Applied Psychology
Murphy, K. R., (1989) Rater errors and rating accuracy, Journal of Applied Psychology
Ronen, K, (1999) Rating errors and rating accuracy: A field experiment, Human Performance
Saal, F. E., (1980) Rating the ratings: Assessing the quality of rating data, Psychological Bulletin
Schwab, D. P., (1975) Behaviorally anchored rating scales: A review of the literature, Personnel Psychology
Steele, R. P, (1984) Self-appraisal based upon supervisory feedback, Personnel Psychology
Thornton, III, G. C, (1980) Psychometric properties of self-appraisal and job performance, Personnel Psychology
Viswesvaran, C., (1996) Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings, Journal of Applied Psychology
Wayne, S. J., (1990) Journal of Applied Psychology, Psychology
Wildt, A. R., (1978) Determinants of scale response: Label versus position, Journal of Marketing Research