바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

A Study on the Relationship between Antecedents, Swift Trust and Work Attitudes of Interpersonal Trust in the Temporary Task Team

Abstract

The objective of this study is to reveal the antecedents and outcomes of trust, or more specifically swift trust, among team members in a temporary task team. The purpose of this study is to analyze trust antecedents based on social network variables and conduct trust research among team members of a temporary task team. The conclusions drawn from this study are briefly summarized as follows: First, the attributes of each team member within a temporary task team have an overall positive effect on swift trust. Second, the social network of the team members has a direct influence on the swift trust among team members in a temporary task team. Third, it is clearly proven that swift trust in a temporary task team has a positive influence on the work attitudes of the team members. In other words, if swift trust exists between team members, it will have a positive influence on each individual's job commitment, team commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. Fourth, swift trust was seen to play an intermediary role between preceding factors and outcome variables. Factors such as ability, reputation, benevolence, and strength of ties comprise swift trust and these factors directly influence the working attitudes of the team members. The implications and limitations of this study was discussed.

keywords
trust, swift trust, temporary task team, social network, 신뢰, 속성신뢰, 일시적 작업팀, 사회연결망

Reference

1.

구자숙 (2005). 조직내 신뢰: 개념화와 연구동향. 한국심리학회지, Vol. 11(특집호), 69- 83.

2.

이군희 (2002). 사회과학 연구방법론, 법문사.

3.

정범구, 이상석 (1999). 조직공정성이 조직유효성에 미치는 영향에 있어서 신뢰의 매개효과에 관한 연구. 경영논집, 15(1).

4.

Anderson, M. (2002). The Effects of Individuals' Social Network Characteristics and Information Processing Characteristics on their Sense Making of Complex, Ambiguous issues. Doctorial Dissertation, The University of Minnesota.

5.

Aubert, B. A., & Kelsey, B. L. (2003). Further Understanding of Trust and Performance in Virtual Teams. Small Group Research, 34, 575-618.

6.

Barber, B. (1983). The Logic and Limits of Trust. New Brunswick, NJ.

7.

Bian, Y. (1997). Bringing Strong Ties Back in: Indirect Ties, Network bridges, and Job Searches in China. American Sociological Review, 62, 366-385.

8.

Bishop, J. W., & K. D. Scott (2000). An Examination of Organizational and Team Commitment in a Self-directed Team Environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 439-450.

9.

Blake R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1984). Solving Costly Intergroup Conflicts: Achieving Intergroup Trust, Cooperation and Teamwork. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

10.

Blau, P. H. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life, NY: John Wiley.

11.

Burt, R. S. & Knez, M. (1996). Trust and Third-Party Gossip. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler(Eds.), Trust in Organization: Frontiers of Theory and Research, 68-89.

12.

Butler, J. K. (1991). Towards Understanding and Measuring Conditions of Trust: Evolution of a Condition of Trust Inventory. Journal of Management, 17, 643-663.

13.

Carnevale, D. G. (1995). Trustworthy Government, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

14.

Clark, M. C. & Payne, R. L. (1997). The Nature and Structure of Workers' Trust in Management. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 18, 205-224.

15.

Cook, J. & Wall, T. (1980). New Work Attitude Measures of Trust, Organizational Commitment and Personal Need non-fulfillment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53, 39-52.

16.

Cross, R. & Cummings, J. N. (2004). Ties and Network Correlates of Individual Performance in Knowledge-Intensive Work. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 928-937.

17.

Dasgupta, P.(1988). Trust as a Commodity. in D. Gambetta(Ed.) Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, 49-72.

18.

Das, T. K. & B. S. Teng. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 491-512.

19.

Davis, G. M. (1999). A Test of an Interpersonal Trust Model. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 6B, 2996.

20.

Driscoll, J. W. (1978). Trust and Participation in Organizational Decision Making as Predictors of Satisfaction. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21(1),: 44-56.

21.

Giffin, K. (1967), The Contribution of Studies of Source Credibility to a Theory of Interpersonal Trust in the Communication Department. Psychological Bulletin, 68, 104-120.

22.

Goodman, R. A., & Goodman, L. P. (1976). Some Management Issues in Temporary Systems: A Study of Professional Development and Manpower-The Theater Case. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 494-501.

23.

Heimer, Carol A. (2001). Solving the Problem of Trust. In K.S. Cook (ed.) Trust in Society, New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, 40-88.

24.

Hosmer, L. T. (1995). Trust: The Connecting Link Between Organizational Theory and Moral Philosophy. Academy of Management Review. 20(2), 379-390.

25.

Ibarra, H. (1995). Race, Opportunity, and Diversity in Social Circles in Managerial Networks. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 673-703.

26.

Ibarra, H. (1997). Paving an Alternative Route: Gender Differences in Managerial Networks. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 91-102.

27.

Jarvenpaa, S. L., Knoll, K., & Leidner, D. E. (1998). Is Anybody Out There? The Implications of Trust in Global Virtual Teams. Journal of management Information Systems, 14, 29-65.

28.

Kanungo, R. N. (1982). Measurement of Job and Work Involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(3), 341-349.

29.

Kawin, B. F. (1992). How Movies Work. Berkely: University of California Press.

30.

Konovsky, M. A. & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship Behavior and Social Exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 656-669.

31.

Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (1987). The Leadership Differs from Management. New York: Free press.

32.

Kramer, R. M. & Cook, K. S. (2004). Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemas and Approaches. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

33.

Larzelere, R. E. & Huston, T. L. (1980). The Dyadic Trust Scale: Toward Understanding Interpersonal Trust in Close Relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 595-604.

34.

Lin, N. (2001). Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and action. NY: Cambridge University Press.

35.

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, D. (1995). An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.

36.

McAllister, D. J. (1995), Affect-and Cognition -Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59.

37.

Messik, D. M. & Kramer, R. M. (2001). Trust as a Form of Shallow Morality. In K. S. Cook(Ed.). Trust I society(pp. 89-118). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

38.

Meyerson, D. Weick, K. E., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Swift Trust and Temporary Groups. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler(Eds.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory And research(pp.166-195). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

39.

Mishra, A. K. (1996). Organizational responses to crisis: The Centrality of trust. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (ed.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, 261-287.

40.

Morrison, E. W. (2002), Newcomers' Relationships: The Role of Social Network Ties during Socialization. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 6, 1149-1160.

41.

Organ, D. W. (1990). The Motivational Basis of Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior. 12, 43-72.

42.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B. Moorman, R. H. & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational Leader Behaviors and Their Effects on Followers' Trust in Leader, Satisfaction, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107-142.

43.

Popa, C. L. (2005), Initial Trust Formation in Temporary Small Task Groups: Testing a Model of Swift Trust. Ph d. Dissertation, Kent State University.

44.

Sitkin, S. B., & Roth, N. L. (1993). Explaining the Limited Effectiveness of Legalistic “Remedies” for Trust/Distrust, Organizational Science, 4, 367-392

45.

Smith, K. G., Carroll, S. J. & Ashford, S. J. (1995). Intra-and Interorganizational Cooperation: Toward a Research Agenda. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 7-23.

46.

Whitener, E. M., Brodt, S. E., Korsgaard, M. A. & Werner, J. M. (1998). Managers as Initiators of Trust: an Exchange Relationship Framework for Understanding Managerial Trustworthy Behavior. Academy of Management Review. 23(3), 513-530.

47.

Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: The Free Press.

logo