바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Personality and Adaptive Performance in Individual and Team Level: The Mediating Effect of General Self-efficacy and the Moderating Effect of Transformational Leadership

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to examine the mediating effect of general self-efficacy in the relationship between personality(openness to experience, emotional stability) and adaptive performance in individual level, the relationship between team personality and team adaptive performance in team level, the mediating effect of general self-efficacy in the relationship between team adaptive performance and individual adaptive performance in the cross level, and the moderating effect of team leader's transformational leadership in the relationship between personality and adaptive performance at team level. Using a survey research method, the data were collected from 193 employees in 49 teams from different organizations. The results showed that general self-efficacy fully mediated the relationships between personality(openness to experience, emotional stability) and adaptive performance. And there was positively significant relationship between team openness to experience and team adaptive performance. But the relationship between team emotional stability and team adaptive performance was not significant. It was found that there was partial mediating effect of the general self-efficacy in the relationship between team adaptive performance and individual adaptive performance. Team leader's transformational leadership moderated the relationship between team openness to experience and team adaptive performance. Finally, theoretical and practical implications and limitations of the research were discussed.

keywords
경험에 대한 개방성, 정서적 안정성, 적응수행, 일반적 자기효능감, 팀 성격, 팀 적응수행, 변혁적 리더십, 교차수준 매개, openness to experience, emotional stability, adaptive performance, general self-efficacy, team personality, team adaptive performance, transformational leadership, meso-mediation

Reference

1.

오인수 (2002). 일반적 자기효능감: 개념, 측정관련 이슈와 인적자원관리 측면의 시사점. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 15, 49-72.

2.

유태용 (2007). 성격의 6요인(HEXACO) 모델에 의한 성격특성과 조직구성원 직무수행 간의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 20, 285-316.

3.

한태영 (2005). 적응수행에 대한 개인 및 팀 수준의 영향: 다수준(Multilevel) 접근법의 적용. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 18, 51-77.

4.

한태영 (2008). 적응수행에 대한 직무탈진, 심리적 집합주의 및 성격의 상호작용 효과. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 21, 631 -655.

5.

황종오, 유태용, 한태영 (2006). 팀성격과 팀내 조직시민행동 규범이 구성원의 조직시민행동에 미치는 효과: 다수준 구성타당화 접근. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 19, 259-284.

6.

Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhi & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp.11-39). Heidelberg: Springer.

7.

Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Chicago: Dorsey Press.

8.

Allworth, E., & Hesketh, B. (1999). Construct -oriented biodata: Capturing change-related and contextually relevant future performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7, 97-111.

9.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change, Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.

10.

Bandura, A. (1997). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. In A. Bandura(Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies(pp. 1-45). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

11.

Bandura, A., Adams, N. E., Hardy, A. B., & Howells, G. N. (1980). Tests of the generality of self-efficacy theory. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 4, 39-66.

12.

Barker, J. R. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 408-437.

13.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.

14.

Barrick, M R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.

15.

Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 377-391.

16.

Barry, B., & Stewart, G. L. (1997). Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 62-78.

17.

Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industry, military, and educational impact. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

18.

Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 207-218.

19.

Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

20.

Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analyses. In K. J. Klein & S. W. Kozlowski(Ed.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations(pp. 349-381). San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.

21.

Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Tannenbaum, S. I., Salas, E., & Volpe, C. E. (1995). Defining competencies and establishing team training requirements. In R. A. Guzzo, E. Salas, & Associates(Eds.), Team Effectiveness and decision- making in organizations(pp.333-380). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

22.

Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different level of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234-246.

23.

Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 62-83.

24.

Davis-Saks, M. L. (1990). Credit analysis team. In J. R. Hackman(Ed.), Groups that work (and those that don't): Creating conditions for effective teamwork(pp.126-145). San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.

25.

Eden, D. (2001). Mean efficacy: External sources of general and specific subject efficacy. In M. Erez, U. Kleinbeck, & H. Thierry (Eds.), Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy(pp.73-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum,

26.

Eden, D., & Aviram, A. (1993). Self-efficacy training to speed reemployment: Helping people to help themselves. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 352-360.

27.

Eden, D., & Kinnar, J. (1991). Modeling Galatea: Boosting self-efficacy to increase volunteering. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 770-780.

28.

Feldman, M. S., & Rafaeli, A. (2002). Organizational routines as sources of connections and understanding. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 309-331.

29.

Gardner, D. G., & Pierce, J. L. (1998). Self-efficacy within the organizational context. Group and Organizational Management, 23, 48-70.

30.

Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In Merviedle, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F Ostendorf(Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe(Vol. 7, pp.7-28). Tilburg University Press: The Netherlands.

31.

Gibson, G, C. B., Randel, A. E., & Earley, P. C. (2000). Understanding group efficacy: An empirical test of multiple assessment methods. Group and Organizational Management, 25, 67-97.

32.

Guzzo, R. A., Yost, p. R., Campbell, R. J., & Shea, G. P. (1993). Potency in groups: articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 87-106.

33.

Hesketh, B., & Neal, A. (1999). Technology and performance. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos(Eds.), The changing nature of performance (pp.21-55). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

34.

Howard, A. (1995). A framework for work change. In A. Howard (Ed..), The changing nature of work (pp.3-44). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

35.

James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). : An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306-309.

36.

Judge, T. A., & Ilies, R. (2002). Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 797-807.

37.

Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Pucik, V., & Welbourne, T. M. (1999). Managerial coping with organizational change: A dispositional perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 107-122.

38.

Ilgen, D. R., & Pulakos, E. D. (1999). Employee performance in today's organizations. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance (pp.1-18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

39.

Ilgen, D. R., Hollebeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From I-P-O models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517-543.

40.

Kozlowski, S. W., Gully, S. M., Nason, E. R., & Smith, E. M. (1999). Developing adaptive teams: A teary of compilation and performance across levels and time. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance (pp.230-294). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

41.

Kozlowski, S. W., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations. In K. J. Klein & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.) Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp.3-90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

42.

LePine, J. A., Colquitt, J. A., & Erez, A. (2000). Adaptability to changing task contexts: Effects of general cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and openness to experience. Personnel Psychology, 53, 563-593.

43.

Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K. G., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 385-425.

44.

Mathieu, J. E., & Taylor., S. R. (2007). A framework for testing meso-mediational relationships in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 141-172.

45.

Morgeson, F. P., & Hofmann, D. A. (1999). The structure and function of collective construct: Implications for research and theory development. Academy of Management Review, 24, 249-265.

46.

Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., Threlfall, K. V., Uhlman, C. E., & Costanza, D. P. (1993). Personality, adaptability and performance: Performance on well-defined and ill-defined problem-solving tasks. Human Performance, 6, 241-285.

47.

Ostroff, C., & Bowen, D. E. (2000). Moving HR to a higher level: HR practices and organizational effectiveness. In K. J. Klein & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 221-265). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

48.

Phares, E. J. (1984). Introduction to personality. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.

49.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Bommer, W. H. (1996). Transformational leader behaviors and substitutes for leadership as determinants of employee satisfaction, commitment, trust, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 22, 259-298.

50.

Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamonodon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the work place: Development of a taxonomy of adaptability performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 612-624.

51.

Pulakos, E. D., Schmitt, N., Dorsey, D W., Arad, S., Hedge, J. W., & Borman, W. C. (2002). Predicting adaptive performance: Further tests of a model of adaptability, Human Performance, 15, 299-323.

52.

Rafferty, A. E., & Griffin, M. A. (2006). Perceptions of organizational change: A stress and coping perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1154-1162.

53.

Salas, E., Goodwin, G. F., & Burke, C. S. (2009). Team effectiveness in complex organizations: Cross-disciplinary perspectives and approaches. New York: Routledge Academic.

54.

Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S., & Cha, S. E. (2007). Embracing transformational leadership: Team values and the impact of leader behavior on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1020-1030.

55.

Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437-454.

56.

Shelton, S. M. (1990). Developing the construct of general self-efficacy. Psychological Reports, 66, 987-994.

57.

Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. (1982). The self-efficacy scale: construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663-671.

58.

Smith, E. M., Ford, J. K., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (1997). Building adaptive expertise: Implications or training design. In M. A. Quinones & A. Ehrenstein (Eds.), Training for a rapidly changing workplace: Applications of psychological research (pp.89-118). Washington, DC: APA Books.

59.

Stewart, G. L. (2003). Toward an understanding of the multilevel role of personality in teams. In M. R. Barrick & A. M. Ryan (Eds.), Personality and work: Reconsidering the role personality in organizations (pp.183-204). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

60.

Stewart, G. L., & Barrick, M. R. (2004). Four Lessons Learned from the person-situation debate: A review and research agenda. In B. Smith & B. Schneider (Eds.), Personality and organizations (pp.61-85). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

61.

Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organizations (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

62.

Zaccaro, S. J., Blair, V., Peterson, C., & Zazanis, M. (1995). Collective efficacy. In J. E. Maddux(Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application (pp. 305-328). NY: Plenum Press.

63.

Zaccaro, S. J., Rittman, A., & Marks, M. (2001). Team Leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 451-483.

logo