open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 1229-0696
This study was conducted to determine what factors the traffic accident risk index (TARI) consists of and whether the index is validly influential and convincing as a standard to measure the traffic accident proneness of drivers. To attain this objective, the TARI of 6 items was applied to 352 drivers. Based on the existing studies, the TARI was hypothesized in a model of 2 factors, i.e. near accident and accident anxiety and a model of 3 factors (near accident, self-evaluation of accident anxiety and surrounding evaluation of accident anxiety), and a confirmatory factor analysis was made of each model. The analysis revealed that the TARI of 3 factors was more appropriate than that of 2 factors. To determine whether the TARI is valid as a standard to indicate traffic proneness, this study examined to what extent a driver’s dangerous driving behaviors threatening traffic safety (regressive counteraction) affected and explained his/her past accident experiences and TARI. The findings showed that such behaviors affected and explained the TARI much more than the past accident experiences. Accordingly, the TARI of 3 factors proved to be a standard valid to measure the traffic accident proneness of a driver.
박영호 (2000). 교통사고 운전자의 인적요인 분석: 버스 운전자를 중심으로. 한국심리학회: 산업 및 조직, 13(2), 75-90.
오한진, 이동배, 박 암 (1992). 택시운전기사의 불안정도와 교통사고 발생 양상. 충남의대잡지, 19(2), 15-24.
윤현상, 송수식, 이상연, 백주희 (1996). 교통사고 다발자의 성격성향에 관한 연구: 서울시내 일 버스회사를 대상으로, 신경정신의학, 35(5), 1095-1104.
이순열, 이순철 (2009a). 운전자의 속도 욕구좌절이 운전 스트레스에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 15(2), 319-338.
이순열, 이순철 (2009b). 운전스트레스 대처방식에 따른 교통사고 위험의 변화. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 15(3), 431-446.
이순열, 이순철, 박선진 (2006). 운전확신수준의 변화가 연령별 운전행동에 미치는 영향, 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 12(3), 23- 47.
이순철 (1997). 운전자행동의 심리학적 연구, 심리과학, 6(1), 11-26.
이순철 (2000a). 교통행동의 심리학적 이해: 교통심리학, 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 6(1), 119-143.
이순철 (2000b). 교통심리학. 서울: 학지사.
이순철 (2003). 과속운전의 행동배경과 형성과정에 미치는 사회심리적 요인, 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 9(특집호), 57-73.
이순철 (2004). 교통행동 연구의 경향성 분석을 위한 문헌고찰: 1990년 이후 한국 교통심리학의 연구경향분석. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 10(3), 1-18.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds), Testing structural equation models (pp.136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Dukes, R. L., Clayton, S. L, Jenkins, L. T., Miller, T. L., & Rodgers S. E. (2001). Effects of aggressive driving and driver characteristics on road rage. The Social Science Journal, 38, 323-331.
Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286-299.
Kontogiannis, T. (2006). Patterns of driver stress and coping strategies in a Greek sample and their relationship to aberrant behaviors and traffic accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38, 913-924.
Lee, S. C., Lee, S. Y., & Park, S. J. (2007). The Influences of Driving Confidence Levels on Traffic Accidents: Research Using Path Analysis, 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 13(4), 101-112.
Lee, S. Y., Lee, S. C., & Song, H. W. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Traffic Accident Risk Index(TARI), International Conference on Asia Pacific Psychology (ICAPP), 207-208.
Stradling, S. G., Meadows, M. L., & Beatty, S. (2004). Characteristics and crash-involvement of seeding, violating and thrill-seeking drivers. Traffic and Transport Psychology Proceedings of the ICTTP 2004, 177-192.
Warner, H. W., & Aberg, L. (2006). Drivers' decision to speed: A study inspired by the theory of planned behavior, Transportation Research Park F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 9, 427-433.