바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

The Effects of Supervisor and Team on Suggestion Behaviors of Workers in Manufacturing Setting: Performance Management Efficacy and Coaching through Individual and Team Processes

Abstract

The suggestion behavior of blue-collar workers is a voluntary action that may contribute to organizational effectiveness. The purpose of this study was to investigate the individual and team level processes of suggestion behavior in relation to the performance management context. At the individual level, we examined the effect of supervisor's performance coaching through workers' justice perception toward performance management. At the team level, the study investigated the effect of supervisor' performance management efficacy as a team factor to the extent to which team-member exchange (TMX) mediates at the team-level on suggestion behavior. To test the research model, data from 138 skilled engineers were collected in 36 teams of working for an automobile manufacturer. The results showed that performance management justice perception fully mediated between performance coaching and suggestion behavior, and TMX at the team level also had a full mediation effect between performance management efficacy and suggestion behavior. Further verification of alternative models has shown that the research model is more compelling. The study identified the effects of immediate superiors and colleagues that were overlooked in the previous study and found that it was necessary to manage the working environment rather than the institutional elements to facilitate the suggestion behavior of field workers. Based on this, the implications, limitations, and future research tasks were presented.

keywords
제안행동, 성과코칭, 성과관리효능감, 평가공정성, 팀원교류(TMX), Suggestion Behavior, Performance Management Efficacy, Performance Caching, Justice Perception, TMX

Reference

1.

Bae, K. S., Kwon, H. J., & Nho, Y. J. (2008). A study of mid- and long-term development strategy for workplace innovation. Korea Labor Institute. http://bitly.kr/QH37isGQ

2.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

3.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

4.

Bernardin, H. J., & Villanova, P. (2005). Research streams in rater self-efficacy. Group & Organization Management, 30(1), 61-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601104267675

5.

Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349-381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

6.

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

7.

Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. M. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Personnel Selection in Organizations (pp. 71-98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

8.

Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM–firm performance linkages: The role of the “strength” of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 203-221. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2004.12736076

9.

Buech, V. I. D., Michel, A., & Sonntag, K. (2010). Suggestion systems in organizations: what motivates employees to submit suggestions? European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4), 507-525. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061011086311

10.

Burdett, J. O. (1991). To coach, or not to coach – that is the question! Part 1. Industrial and Commercial Training, 23(5). https://doi.org/10.1108/00197859110136171

11.

Cardy, R. L., & Dobbins, G. H. (1994). Performance appraisal: The influence of liking on cognition. In J. F. Porac, J. R. Meindl, & C. Stubbart (Eds.), Advances in Managerial Cognition and Organizational Information Processing, 5, 115-140. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

12.

Choi, Y. D., & Lee, D. S. (2017). Review and conceptual analysis of employee voice behavior. Korean Academy of Management, 25(2), 129-157. https://bit.ly/2NM65ji

13.

Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278-321. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2958

14.

Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425-445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425

15.

DeNisi, A. S., & Kluger, A. N. (2000). Feedback effectiveness: Can 360-degree appraisals be improved? Academy of Management Executive, 14(1), 129-139. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2000.2909845

16.

Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869-884. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.26279183

17.

Detert, J. R., & Edmondson, A. C. (2011). Implicit voice theories: Taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 461-488. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.61967925

18.

Erdogan, B. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of justice perceptions in performance appraisals. Human Resource Management Review, 12(4), 555-578. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1053-4822(02)00070-0

19.

Fairbank, J., Spangler, W., & Williams, S. D. (2003). Motivating creativity through a computer-mediated employee suggestion management system. Behavior & Information Technology, 22(5), 305-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290310001593630

20.

Farh, C. I. C., & Chen, G. (2018). Leadership and member voice in action teams: Test of a dynamic phase model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(1), 97-110. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000256

21.

Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), 115-130. https://doi.org/10.2307/256422

22.

Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains, Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1112-1142. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9704071865

23.

Frese, M., Teng, E., & Wijnen, C. J. (1999). Helping to improve suggestion systems: Predictors of making suggestions in companies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1139-1155. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1379(199912)20:7<1139::aid-job946>3.0.co;2-i

24.

Gillespie, N. A., & Mann, L. (2004). Transformational leadership and shared values: The building blocks of trust. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(6), 588-607. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940410551507

25.

Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(2), 340-342. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.2.340

26.

Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2005). A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 269-287. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.16387885

27.

Hadi, M., Sajjadi, H., Baratpour, S., & Toghiani, A. (2013). Performance evaluation of the suggestion system. Medical Archives, 67(2), 131-133. https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2013.67.131-133

28.

Hall, D. T., Otazo, K. L., & Hollenbeck, G. P. (1999). Behind closed doors: What really happens in executive coaching. Organizational Dynamics, 27(3), 39-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-2616(99)90020-7

29.

Han, T. Y. (2010). An investigation of the construct of performance evaluation system effectiveness from the evaluatee’s perspective and its measurement tool. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 23(2), 365-394.https://doi.org/10.24230/ksiop.23.2.201005.365

30.

Heslin, P. A., Vandewalle, D., & Latham, G. P. (2006). Keen to help? Managers’ implicit person theories and their subsequent employee coaching. Personnel Psychology, 59(4), 871-902. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00057.x

31.

Hedge, J. W., & Borman, W. C. (1995). Changing conceptions and practices in performance appraisal. In A. Howard (Ed.), The Changing Nature of Work, 451-481. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

32.

Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard university press.

33.

Hu, X., Kaplan, S., & Dalal, R. S. (2010). An examination of blue-versus white-collar workers’ conceptualizations of job satisfaction facets. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(2), 317-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.10.014

34.

Ichniowski, C., Shaw, K., & Prennushi, G. (1997). The effects of human resource practices on manufacturing performance: A study of steel finishing lines. American Economic Review, 87(3), 291-313. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2951347

35.

Kanfer, R., Chen, G., & Pritchard, R. D. (2012). Work motivation: Past, present and future. In W. R. Boswell, A. J. S. Colvin, & T. C. Darnold (Eds.), Organizational Systems and Employee Motivation (pp. 361-400). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203809501

36.

Kavanagh, P., Benson, J., & Brown, M. (2007). Understanding performance appraisal fairness. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 45(2), 132-150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1038411107079108

37.

Keeping, L. M., & Levy, P. E. (2000). Performance appraisal reactions: Measurement, modeling, and method bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 708-723. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.708

38.

Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254-284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254

39.

Korsgaard, M. A., & Roberson, L. (1995). Procedural justice in performance evaluation: The role of instrumental and non-instrumental voice in performance appraisal discussions. Journal of Management, 21(4), 657-669. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639502100404

40.

Konovsky, M. A., & Cropanzano, R. (1991). Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(5), 698-707. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.5.698

41.

LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 853-868. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.853

42.

Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrow, R. T. (2000). An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 407-416. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.407

43.

Lind, E. A. (2001). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgements as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. ln J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice, 56-88. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

44.

Lind, E. A., Kray, L., & Thompson, L. (2001). Primacy effects in justice judgments: Testing predictions from fairness heuristic theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85(2), 189-210. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2937

45.

Liang, J., Farh, C. I. C., & Farh, J.-L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0176

46.

Liu, X., & Batt, R. (2010). How supervisors influence performance: A multilevel study of coaching and group management in technology-mediated services. Personnel Psychology, 63(2), 265-298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01170.x

47.

Mathieu, J. E., & Taylor, S. R. (2007). A framework for testing meso-mediational relationships in Organizational Behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(2), 141-172. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.436

48.

Maynes, T. D., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2014). Speaking more broadly: An examination of the nature, antecedents, and consequences of an expanded set of employee voice behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 87-112. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034284

49.

Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

50.

Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373-412. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.574506

51.

Morrison, E. W., Wheeler-Smith, S. L., & Kamdar, D. (2011). Speaking up in groups: A cross-level study of group voice climate and voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 183-191. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020744

52.

Oh, H. J., & Chung, M. H. (2014). Employee voice behavior: exploring antecedents and examining the moderating effects of group conflicts. Korean Academy of Management, 22(4), 35-70. https://bit.ly/2RhfzFl

53.

Pinder, C. C., & Harlos, K. P. (2001). Employee silence: Quiescence and acquiescence as responses to perceived injustice. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 20, 331-369. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-7301(01)20007-3

54.

Purcell, J., & Hutchinson, S. (2007). Front-line managers as agents in the HRM-performance causal chain: Theory, analysis and evidence. Human Resource Management Journal, 17(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2007.00022.x

55.

Rico, R., Molleman, E., Sánchez-Manzanares, M., & Van der Vegt, G. S. (2007). The Effects of Diversity Faultlines and Team Task Autonomy on Decision Quality and Social Integration. Journal of Management, 33(1), 111-132.https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306295307

56.

Rusbult, C. E., Farrell, D., Rogers, G., & Mainous, A. G. (1988). Impact of exchange variables on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: An integrative model of responses to declining job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 599-627. https://doi.org/10.5465/256461

57.

Seers, A. (1989). Team-member exchange quality: A new construct for role-making research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43(1), 118-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(89)90060-5

58.

Seers, A., Petty, M. M., & Cashman, J. F. (1995). Team-member exchange under team and traditional management: A naturally occurring quasi-experiment. Group & Organization Management, 20(1), 18-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601195201003

59.

Slocum Jr, J. W., & Sims Jr, H. P. (1980). A typology for integrating technology, organization, and job design. Human Relations, 33(3), 193-212. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678003300304

60.

Smither, J. W., & London, M. (2009). Performance management: putting research into action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

61.

Steelman, L. A., Levy, P. E., & Snell, A. F. (2004). The feedback environment scale: Construct definition, measurement, and validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403258440

62.

Tak, J. K., & Cho, E. H. (2011). Development and validity of the coaching leadership scale. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 24(1), 127-155. https://doi.org/10.24230/ksiop.24.1.201102.127

63.

Takeuchi, R., Chen, Z., & Cheung, S. Y. (2012). Applying uncertainty management theory to employee voice behavior: An integrative investigation. Personnel Psychology, 65(2), 283-323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01247.x

64.

Tucker, S., Chmiel, N., Turner, N., Hershcovis, M. S., & Stride, C. B. (2008). Perceived organizational support for safety and employee safety voice: The mediating role of coworker support for safety. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13(4), 319-330. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.13.4.319

65.

van Dijk, C., & van den Ende, J. (2002). Suggestion systems: Transferring employee creativity into practicable ideas. R&D Management, 32(5), 387-395. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00270

66.

Walumbwa, F. O., & Schaubroeck, J. (2009). Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1275-1286. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015848

67.

Wood, R. E., & Marshall, V. (2008). Accuracy and effectiveness in appraisal outcomes: The influence of self-efficacy, personal factors and organisational variables. Human Resource Management Journal, 18(3), 295-313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2008.00067.x

68.

Yukl, G. A., & Becker, W. S. (2006). Effective empowerment in organizations. Organization Management Journal, 3(3), 210-231. https://doi.org/10.1057/omj.2006.20

logo