본 연구는 대학생 250명을 대상으로 장독립-장의존 인지양식이 정보탐색행위에 미치는 영향을 분석하였다. 장독립-장의존 인지양식은 집단잠입도형검사(GEFT: Group Embedded Figure Test)로 검사하였으며, 정보탐색행위는 정보탐색 수행평가와 설문조사의 방법으로 조사하였다. 분석 결과, 장독립-장의존 인지양식은 본 연구에서 설정한 항목들 중에서 한 개의 항목을 제외하고는 전부 정보탐색 수행평가의 항목에 영향을 미친 것으로 분석되었다. 따라서 인지 과정 도중에 작용하는 인지적 특성인 인지양식은 정보를 탐색하는 실제적인 행위에 영향을 미쳤다고 할 수 있다. 그리고 장독립-장의존 인지양식은 정보탐색행위의 영역적인 면에서는 탐색결과와 일반적인 정보탐색행위를 제외하고, 탐색과정에만 영향을 미쳤다. 그러므로 정보탐색행위의 탐색 과정적 영역에서는 인지양식의 연구가 효율적이라고 할 수 있다.
This study analyzed the effect of the cognitive style of field dependence/independence to the information-seeking behaviors of 250 undergraduate students. The cognitive style of field dependence/ independence was examined by Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT), information-seeking behaviors were examined by information-seeking performances, and survey for information-seeking behaviors. As a result of the analysis, the cognitive style of field dependence/independence affected items of information-seeking performances except one item among items set in this study. The cognitive style, the cognitive characteristics acting in the process of cognitive activity affected the actual activities of information-seeking behaviors. The cognitive style of field dependence/independence affected the seeking process except the results of seeking and general information-seeking behaviors in the areas of information-seeking behaviors. Therefore, the study of cognitive style can be effective in the seeking process areas of information-seeking behaviors.
구병두. 1989. ..학업성취 관련변인에 대한 메타분석... 박사학위논문, 건국대학교 대학원, 교육학과.
오은주, 김정섭. 2007. 온라인 환경에서 정보탐색활동과 학습자 특성과 상관관계. ..수산해양교육연구.., 19(3): 415-428.
유재옥. 1990. 정보검색자의 인지양식이 정보검색에 미치는 영향. ..한국문헌정보학회지.., 19: 189-241.
유재옥. 1996. 온라인 탐색자의 개인적 특성에 관한 문헌연구. ..한국문헌정보학회지.., 30(4): 39-60.
윤미소, 김한일. 2003. 초등학생의 인지양식에 따른 검색전략비교. ..한국컴퓨터교육학회 논문집.., 6(3): 143-150.
전윤식, 장혁표. 1980. ..집단잠입도형검사... 부산: 태화출판.
조연. 2010. ..문제중심학습에서 학습자의 인지양식과 메타인지가 문제해결에 미치는 영향... 박사학위논문, 전북대학교 대학원, 교육학과.
주영주, 최정민. 2003. 하이퍼텍스트 환경에서 학습자 인지양식과 탐색도구 유형이 정보탐색에 미치는 영향. ..교육과학연구.., 34(2): 1-21.
Allport, G. W. 1937. Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt & Co.
Chen, S. Y. & Ford, N. 1998. “Modelling user navigation behaviours in a hyper-media-based learning system: An individual differences approach.” Knowledge Organization, 25(3): 67-78.
Chou, C. & Lin, H. 1998. “The effect of navigation map types and cognitive styles on learners’ performance in a computer-networked hypertext learning system.” Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7(2/3): 151-176.
Clewley, Chen, & Liu. 2010. “Cognitive styles and search engine preferences: Field dependence/ independence vs holism/serialism.” Journal of Documentation, 66(4): 585-603.
Ellis, D., Ford, N., & Wood, F. 1993. “Hypertext and learning styles.” The Electronic Library, 11(1): 13-18.
Ford, N., Eaglestone, B., Madden, A., & Whittle, M. 2009. “Web searching by the ‘general public’: An individual differences perspective.” Journal of Documentation, 65(4): 632-667.
Ford, N., Wilson, T. D., Foster, A., Ellis, D., & Spink, A. 2002. “Information seeking and mediated searching: Part 4. Cognitive styles in information seeking.” JASIST, 53(9): 728-735.
Ford, N., Miller, D., & Moss, N. 2005. “Web search strategies and human individual differences: Cognitive and demographic factors, internet attitudes, and approaches.” JASIST, 56(7): 741-756.
Frias-Martinez, Chen, & Liu. 2008. “Investigation of behavior and perception of digital library users: A cognitive style perspective.” International Journal of Information Management, 28(5): 355-365.
Garger, S. & Guild, P. 1984. Learning styles: The crucial difference. Curriculum review.
Hayes, J. & Allinson, C. W. 1998. “Cognitive style and the theory and practice of individual and collective learning in organizations.” Human Relations, 51(7): 847-871.
Hsu, P. S. & Dwyer, F. 2004. “Effect of level of adjunct questions on achievement of field independent/field dependent learners.” International Journal of Instruction Media, 31(1): 99-106.
Jonassen, D. H. & Grabowski, B. L. 1993. Handbook of individual differences: Learning and instruction. NJ: LEA.
Julien, H. & Duggan, L. J. 2000. “A Longitudinal Analysis of the Information Needs and Uses Literature.” Library & Information Science Research, 22(3): 291-309.
Kim, Kyung-Sun. 2001. “Information-seeking on the web: Effects of user and task variables.” Library & Information Science Research, 23(3): 233-255.
Kim, K. S. & Allen, B. 2002. “Cognitive and task influences on Web searching behavior.” JASIST, 53(2): 109-119.
Korthauer, R. D. & Koubek, R. J. 1994. “An empirical evaluation of knowledge, cognitive style and structure upon the performance of hypertext task.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 6(4): 373-390.
Leader, L. F. & Klein, J. D. 1996. “The effects of search tool type and cognitive style on performance during hypermedia database searches.” Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(2): 5-15.
Lee, J. & Boling, E. 2008. “Information-conveying approaches and cognitive styles of mental modeling in a hypermedia-based learning environment.” JASIST, 59(4): 644-661.
Leonard, D. & Straus, S. 1997. “Putting your company’s whole brain to work.” Harvard Business Review, 75(4): 110-121.
Liu, M. & Reed, W. M. 1994. “The relationship between the learning strategies and learning styles in a hypermedia environment.” Computers in Human Behavior, 10: 419-434.
Luk, S. C. 1998. “The relationship between cognitive style and academic achievement.” British Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2): 137-147.
McCarron, D. R. 2000. Perceiving the artifact within a virtual museum collection: Cognitive styles and online instructional strategies. Ph.D. diss., University of Virginia.
Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Witkin, H. A. 1971. Group embedded figure test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Palmquist, R. A. & Kim, K. S. 2000. “Cognitive style and on-line database search experience as predictors of Web search performance.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(6): 558-566.
Reiff, J. C. 1996. “At-risk middle level students or field dependent learners?” The Clearing House, 69(4): 231-234.
Riding, R. J. 1997. “On the nature of cognitive style.” Educational Psychology, 17(1-2): 29-49.
Riding, R. J. & Cheema, I. 1991. “Cognitive styles: An overview and integration.” Educational Psychology, 11(3-4): 193-215.
Schmeck, R. R. 1988. Learning strategies and learning styles. New York: Plenum Press.
Sternberg, R. J. 1997. Thinking styles. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Thurstone, L. L. 1951. “Experimental tests of temperament.” In G. Ekman & Others(eds.). Essays in Psychology. A. W.: Uppsala.
Traverse, J. F., Elliot, S. N., & Kratochwill, T. R. 1993. Educational psychology: Effective teaching, effective learning. Dubuque, Iowa: Brown & Benchmark.
Wang, P., Hawk, W. B., & Tenopir, C. 2000. “Users’ interaction with World Wide Web resources: An exploratory study using a holistic approach.” Information Processing and Management, 36(2): 229-251.
Witkin, H. A. 1962. Psychological differentiation: Studies of development. New York: Wiley.
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. 1977. “Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications.” Review of Educational Research, 47(1): 1-64.
Wood, F., Ford, N., Miller, D., Sobczyk, G., & Duffin, R. 1996. “Information skills, searching behaviour and cognitive styles for student-centred learning: A computer-assisted learning approach.” Journal of Information Science, 22(2): 79-92.
Zhang, L. R. & Sternberg, R. J. 2005. “A threefold model of intellectual styles.” Educational Psychology Review, 17(1): 1-53.