바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

An Effect of Different Distribution Methods of Incentive on Work Performance in Small Group

Abstract

This study examined the relative effects of individual incentive system, equally and differentially distributed incentive system in small group on performance of a simulated work task when the opportunities for off-task behavior were available. Four working students (2 males, 2 females) participated in this study and they completed 21 four-hour sessions (7 sessions per each condition). An alternating treatment design was adopted and three experimental conditions were randomly alternated for each session. The computerized work task was used and it consisted of three steps. The number of the correctly completed work tasks and the amount of idle time were the primary dependent variables. Results indicated that the performance difference between the individual incentive system and equally distributed group incentive system was not statistically significant. However, performance differences both between the individual incentive system and differentially distributed group incentive system and between the equally distributed group incentive system and differentially distributed group incentive system were statistically significant. The amount of idle time under the differentially distributed group incentive condition was the lowest and that under the equally distributed group incentive condition was the highest. At the end of the study, participants were given satisfaction, perceived fairness level and future choice questionnaires. For satisfaction and future choice, two of the four participants found differentially distributed group incentive system to be most satisfying, and chose to work under that pay system in the future. These results suggest that the differentially distributed group incentive system might be an alternative plan to increase performance and keep satisfaction of the performers. Also, more realistic simulation is necessary to examine the effects of different types of group incentive on work performance.

keywords
집단 성과급, 팀 성과급, 개인 성과급, 직무수행, 비 직무행동, 교차처치설계, 모의 작업과제, individual incentive, small group incentive, simulated work task, off-task behavior, alternating treatment design, idle time, work performance, individual incentive, small group incentive, simulated work task, off-task behavior, alternating treatment design, idle time, work performance

Reference

1.

노동부 (2005). 연봉제, 성과배분제 실태조사.

2.

박원우, 안성익 (2003). 팀제에 적합한 보상 시스템(팀기반보상)에 관한 연구. 한국인사ㆍ조직학회; 2003년도 춘계학술연구발표회 발표논문집, 3, 213-242.

3.

오세진, 이요행 (2005). 성과급 비율의 차이가 직무수행에 미치는 영향에 대한 검증, 한국 심리학회; 산업 및 조직, 18, 481- 97.

4.

정인수, 금재호, 조준모, 김동배 (2002). 기업 내부 노동시장변화, 서울: 한국노동연구원.

5.

Allison, D. B., Silverstein, J. M., & Galante, V. (1992). Relative effectiveness and cost -effectiveness of cooperative, competitive, and independent monetary incentive systems. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 13, 85-112.

6.

Barlow, D. H., & Hayes, S. C. (1979). Alternating treatments design: One strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 199-210.

7.

Blinder, A. S. (1990). Introduction. In A. S. Blinder (Ed.), Paying for productivity: A look at the evidence (p.1-13). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

8.

Campbell, H. (1952). Group incentive payment schemes: The effect of lack of understanding and of group size. Occupational Psychology, 26, 62-70.

9.

Conrad, C. (1994). Strategic organizational communication: Toward the twenty-first century (3rd ed.). Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

10.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.

11.

Culing, Kathyryn M. (2005). The effects of individual monetary incentive with individual feedback and group monetary incentives with group feedback on high performance. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, 2005). Dissertation Abstract International, 66(07), p. 3933.

12.

Daniels, A. C. (1994). Bringing out the best in people. New York: McGraw Hill.

13.

Daniels, A. C. (1999). Bringing out the best in people. New York: McGraw Hill; 2 edition.

14.

Dickinson, A. M., & Gillette, K. L. (1993). A comparison of the effects of two individual monetary systems on productivity: Piece rate pay versus base pay plus incentives. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 14, 3-82.

15.

Dierks, W., & McNally, K. (1987, March). Incentives you can bank on. The Personnel Administrator, 32, 61-65.

16.

Farr, J. L. (1976). Incentive schedules, productivity and satisfaction in work groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 17, 159- 70.

17.

Flannery, T. P., Hofrichter, D. A., & Platten, P. E. (1996). Peoples, performance, and pay: Dynamic compensation for changing organizations. New York: The Free Press.

18.

Gowen, C. R., Ⅲ. (1991). Gainsharing programs: An overview of history and research. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 11, 77-99.

19.

Gross, S. E. (1995). Compensation for teams: How to design and implement team based reward programs. New York: AMACOM.

20.

Honeywell-Johnson, Judith. A. (1997). Differential effects of individual and group pay contingencies on individual performance (Doctoral dissertation, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, 1997). Dissertation Abstract International, 58(10), p.5682.

21.

Honeywell, J. A., Dickinson, A. M., & Poling, A. (1997). Individual performance as a function of individual and group pay contingencies. The Psychological Record, 47, 261-274.

22.

Jenkins, G. D., & Gupta, N. (1982). financial incentives and productivity improvement. Journal of Contemporary Business, 11, 43-56.

23.

Lawler, E. E., Ⅲ. (1990). Strategic pay: Alingning organizational strategies and pay systems. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

24.

Locke, E. A. (1982). Employee motivation: A discussion. Journal of contemporary Business, 11, 71-81

25.

London, M., & Oldham, G. R. (1977). A comparison of group and individual incentive plans. Academy of Management Journal, 20, 34-41.

26.

Marriott, R. (1949). Size of working group and output. Occupational Psychology, 23, 47-57.

27.

Matthews, G. A., & Dickinson, A. M. (2000). Effects of alternative activities on time allocated to task performance under different percentages of incentive pay. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 11, 13-34

28.

Mawhinney, T. C. (1982). Maximizing versus matching in people versus pigeons. Psychological Reports, 50, 267-281.

29.

Mawhinney, T. C. (1984). Philosophical and ethical aspects of Organizational Behavior Management: Some evaluative feedback. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 6, 5-31.

30.

McAdams, J. L., & Hawk, E. J. (1992). Capitalizing on human assets. Scottsdale, AZ: American Compensation Association.

31.

McClurg, L. N. (2001). Team rewards: How far have we come. Humans Resource Management, 40, 1, 73-86.

32.

McGee, Heather M. (2004). The effects of individual and group incentive on high performance (Doctoral dissertation, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, 2004). Dissertation Abstract International, 66(07), p. 3933.

33.

Myers, J. L., & Well, A. D. (2003). Research design and statistical analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

34.

Oah S., & Lee, J. H. (2005). Effect of different percentages of incentive: A re-examination of different percentages of incentive on work performance: A simulation, A paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Chicago, Illinois.

35.

O'Dell, C. (1986) Major findings from people, performance and pay: A summary of a national survey on non-traditional reward and human resource practices. Houston: The American Productivity Center.

36.

O'dell, C., & McAdams, J. (1987). People, performance, and pay: A full report on the American Productivity Center/American Compensation Association national survey of non-traditional reward and human resource practices. Houston, Texas: American Productivity Center.

37.

Organ, D. W., & Bateman, T. (1986). Organizational Behavior (3rd ed.). Plano, TX: Business Publication.

38.

Peck, C. (1990). Variable pay: New performance rewards (Research Bulletin No. 246), The Conference Board.

39.

Roberts, S. L., & Leary, K. A. (1990). Pay for performance. Unpublished manual script.

40.

Rollins, T. (1989). Productivity-based group incentive plans: Powerful, but use with caution. Compensation and Benefits Review, 39-50. Incomplete citation.

41.

SHRM (Society for Human Resource Management) Survey Program, & Arthur Andersen (1999). Strategic Compensation Survey.

42.

Smoot, D. A. (1997). The effect of linear and non-linear incentive pay system with individual and group pay outs on the social psychology phenomenon of social loafing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI.

43.

Stoneman, K. G., & Dickinson, A. M. (1989). Individual performance as a function of group contingencies and group size. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 10, 131-150.

44.

Thurkow, N. M., Bailey, J. S., & Stamper, M. R. (2000). The Effects of Group and Individual Monetary Incentive on Productivity of Telephone Interviewers. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 20(2), 3-25.

45.

Tully, S. (1993, November 1). Your paycheck gets exciting. Fortune, 83.

46.

Vough, C. F (1979). Productivity: A Practical program for improving efficiency. New York: Amacom.

47.

Weinstein, A. G., & Holzbach, R. L. Jr. (1973). Impact of individual differences, reward distribution, and task structure on productivity in a simulated work environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 58(3), 296-301.

48.

Wellins, R. S., Byham, W. C., & Wilson, J. M. (1991). Empowered teams. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

49.

Zobal, C. & Wilkins, K. (1998). Team Performance measurement & compensation benchmarketing study findings, University of North Texas.

logo