바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The Effect of Navigation Officer's Expertise on Situation Awareness

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the effect of navigation officer's expertise on their situation awareness(SA). For this purpose, the navigation officer's performance of (1) recognizing the previous navigation scenes, (2) comparing of two radar informations, and (3) projecting possible situations based on current context were compared among the officers whose expertise were different in terms of navigation career. The results indicated the experienced navigation officers showed higher recognition accuracy, more sensitive in discriminating the difference between two radar informations, and more correct prediction of future situation than less experienced navigation officers. This study implicated that navigation expertise gained by navigation experience is an important factor in SA of navigation officers who perform multiple and complex tasks involving ship control.

keywords
Officer's situation awareness, Levels of situation awareness, Voyage expertise, Officer's situation awareness, Levels of situation awareness, Voyage expertise, 항해사 상황인식, 상황인식 단계, 항해 전문성

Reference

1.

손영우, 박수애 (2003). 전문성과 작업기억 부하양이 조종사의 상황인식에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 16, 155-174.

2.

해양안전심판원 (2004). 해양안전심판사례(사교종류별 해양사고 통계편)

3.

http://www.kmst.go.kr

4.

Dyer-Smith, M. B. A. (1992). Shipboard organization-The choices for international shipping. Journal of Navigation, 45, 414-424.

5.

Endsley, M. (1988). Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting, Santa Monica, CA: Human factors and Ergonomic Society.

6.

Endsley, M. (1997). The role of situation awareness in naturalistic decision-making. In C.E. Zsambol and G. Klein (Eds.), Naturalistic Decision-making (pp.269-283). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

7.

Endsley, M. (2006). Expertise and situation awareness. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, and R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (pp.377-378). New York: Cambridge University Press.

8.

Gescheider, G. A. (1985). Psychophysics: Method, theory, and application. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

9.

Groctt, D. F. H. (1992). The 21st century navigation situation. Journal of Navigation, 45, 315-328.

10.

Jones, D. C., & Endsley, M. R. (1996). Sources of situation awareness errors in aviation. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 67, 507-512.

11.

Lee, J. D., & Sanquist, T. F. (1996). Maritime automation. In R. Parasuraman & M. Mouloua (Eds.), Automation and human performance: Theory and applications (pp. 365-384). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

12.

Perrow, C. (1984). Normal Accidents. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

13.

Randel, J. M., & Pugh, H. L. (1996). Differences in expert and novice situation awareness in naturalistic decision making. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 579- 597.

14.

Sablowski, N. (1989). Effects of bridge automation on mariner's performance. In A. Coblentz(Ed.), Vigilance and performance in automated systems (pp.101-110). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

15.

Salas, E., Prince, C., Baker, D. P., & Shreshta, L. (1995). Situation awareness in team performance: Implications for measurement and training. Human Factors, 37, 123-136.

16.

Sanderson, P. M. (1989). The human planning and scheduling role in advanced manufacturing systems: An emerging human domain. Human Factors, 31, 635-666.

17.

Transportation Safety Board of Canada(2006). Marine investigation report(No M00M0106).

logo