ISSN : 1229-0696
This study examined the relationship between achievement goal orientations and the acceptance of performance feedback. Three types of performance feedback, information, positive reward, and negative reward feedback, were addressed. One hundred eighty employees were participated in this survey study. The results indicated that 1) positive feedbacks were more accepted than negative feedbacks, 2) the mastery-approach and the performance-approach goal orientation were significantly correlated with the acceptance of information feedback, 3) the mastery-approach and the performance-approach goal orientations were significantly correlated with the acceptance of positive reward feedback, 4) but the negative reward feedback was correlated only with the mastery-approach goal orientation, 5) the variance of the information feedback was significantly explained by the mastery-approach goal orientation, but the variance of positive and negative reward feedback were significantly explained by the interaction between the mastery-approach and the performance-approach goal orientation, 6) when we examined participants' real feedbacks in their job, same trends of the results were observed. The practical implications and theoretical implications in normative and multiple goal theory of this research were discussed.
성미송, 박영석 (2005). 조직 장면에서 2×2 성취 목표 모형의 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 18(1), 97-117.
이차연, 박영석 (2006). 성취 목표 지향성이 업무수행 피드백에 미치는 효과. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 19(1) 25-38.
Ames, C. (1992). Achievement goals, motivational climate, and motivational processes. In G. Robert(Ed.), Motivation in sports and exercise, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Books.
Banister, B. D. (1986). Performance outcome feed back and attributional feedback: Interactive effects on recipient responses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 203-210.
Barron, K. E., & Harakiewicz, J. M. (2001). Achievement goals and optimal motivation: Testing multiple goal models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 706-722.
Butler, R. (1993). Effects of task- and ego -achievement goals on information- seeking during task engagement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 18-31.
Cook, D. M. (1968). The impact on Managers of Frequency of Feedback. Academy of Management Journal, 11, 263-277.
Dweck, C. S., & Elliot, E. (1983). Achievement motivation. In E. Heatherington(Ed.), Handbook of child psychology(Vol. 4, pp.643- 691). New York: Wiley.
Elliot, A. J., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5-12.
Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1993). Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 904-915.
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor. (2001). A 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519.
Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., & Taylor, M. S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 349-371.
Jacobs, A., Jacobs, M., Cavior, N., & Burke, J. (1974). Anonymous feedback: credibility and desirability of structured emotional and behavioral feedback delivered in groups. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 21, 106-111.
Jacobs, M. (1977) A comparison of publicly delivered and anonymously delivered verbal feedback in brief personal growth groups, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 385-390.
Jacobs, M., Jacobs, A., Feldman, A,. & Cavior, N. (1973). Feedback II - The “credibility gap”: delivery of positive and negative emotional and behavioral feedback in groups. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psycholgy, 41, 215-223.
Jacobs, M., Jacobs, A., Gatz, M., & Schaible, T. (1973). The credibility and desirability of positive and negative structure feedback in groups. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 40, 244-252.
Jones, E., & Gerard H. B. (1967). Foundation of Social Psychology. NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254-284.
London, M. (2003). Job feedback, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Maurer, T., & Mitchell Debora, R. D., & Barbeite, F. G. (2002). Predictors of attitudes toward a 360-degree feedback system and involvement in post-feedback management development activity. Journal of Occupaional and Organizational Psychology, 75, 87-107.
Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 77-86.
Miller, R. B., Behrens, J. T., Greene, B. A., & Newman, D. (1993). Goals and perceived ability: Impact on student valuing, self-regulation and persistence. Contemporary Education Psychology, 18, 2-4.
Morran, D. K., & Stockton, R. A. (1980). Effect of self-concept on group member reception of positive and negative feedback. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 27, 260-267.
Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, Organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review. 91, 328-346.
Quinn, R. (1988). Beyond rational management: Mastering the paradox and competing demands of high performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Sujan, H., Weitz, B. A., & Ku mar, N. (1994). Learning orientation, working smart, and effective selling. Journal of Marketing, 58, 39-52.
Sy, T., Saavedra, R., & Cote, S. (2005). The contagious leader: Impact of the leader's mood on the mood of group members, group affective tone, and group processes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 2, 295-305.
VandeWalle & Cummings. (1997). A test of the influence of goal orientation on the feedback-seeking process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 390-400.
Winter, D., & Latham, G. P. (1996). The effect of learning versus outcome goal on a simple versus a complex task. Group and Organization Management, 21(2), 236-250.