바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

Relationship between Thinking Style, Personality, Contextual Performance and Job Performance of Female Telemarketer

Abstract

The purpose of this study were 1) to reconstruct items of the Sternberg(1988)'s thinking style inventory and 2) to examine the relationship between thinking style, personality, contextual performance and job performance of female telemarketer. As a results of the exploratory factor analysis using 877 sales managers, 12 factors were extracted. These 12 factors were identical to the 13 factors of the Sternberg's original inventory except for the anarchic factor. Then, the thinking style inventory was reconstructed based on the results of a factor analysis and inter-factor correlation analysis (i.e., we eliminated factors which had insufficient number of items, combined similar factors and constituted 5 fairs of factors which contrasted with each other in meaning). The results of the correlation analysis between the newly developed thinking style inventory and the HEXACO model revealed that the correlation between similar constructs in these two inventories (ex., the external style of the thinking style inventory and extroversion of the HEXACO) was higher than the correlation between other dissimilar constructs. Also, contextual performance was correlated higher with the legislative, oligarchic, external and liberal style than the executive, monarchic, internal and conservative style, respectively. One of the factors in the contextual performance scale which related to one's intention to follow the organizational rules showed higher correlation with executive and conservative style than legislative and liberal style, respectively. Multiple correlation between factors in the thinking style inventory and supervisors' competency ratings and average task performance in recent 6 months were .25 and .36, respectively. Limitations of the study and directions for future study were discussed.

keywords
thinking style, HEXACO model, contextual performance, thinking style, HEXACO model, contextual performance, 사고양식, HEXACO 모형, 맥락수행

Reference

1.

김도영, 유태용 (2002). 성격의 5요인과 조직에서의 맥락수행간의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 15(2), 1-24.

2.

김성일, 윤미선 (2004). 학업성취 및 성취동기 예측변인으로서의 사고양식 프로파일. 교육심리연구, 18(1), 351-366.

3.

김소연 (2000). Sternberg의 지능 및 사고양식 이론의 타당화. 숙명여자대학교 일반대학원 석사학위 청구논문.

4.

배미란, 한기순, 박인호 (2003). 과학영재들의 사고양식과 5요인성 요인간의 관계. 영재교육연구, 13(1), 43-63.

5.

서미옥 (2004). 대학생의 사고양식과 다섯 가지(Big Five) 성격특성들의 관계. 아시아교육연구, 5(3), 115-140.

6.

유태용, 이기범, Ashton, M. C. (2004). 한국판 HEXACO 성격검사의 구성타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 18(3), 61- 75.

7.

윤미선 (1997). 사고양식과 학업성취에 관한 연구: Sternberg의 정신자치제 이론을 중심으로. 고려대학교 일반대학원 석사학위 청구논문.

8.

윤미선 (1999). 사고양식 검사 도구의 타당화 연구: 초․중등 교사들을 대상으로. 안암교육학연구, 5(1-2), 181-197.

9.

윤미선 (2003). 사고양식에 따른 학습동기 및 교과흥미가 학업성취에 미치는 영향. 고려대학교 일반대학원 박사학위 청구논문.

10.

윤미선, 김성일 (2004). 학업성취 및 성취동기 예측변인으로서의 사고양식 프로파일. 교육심리, 18(1), 351-366.

11.

이정규 (2007). 교사의 성격 5요인과 사고양식과의 관계. 교육학연구, 45(2), 81-103.

12.

이종구, 권은아 (2008). 사고양식과 업무수행간의 관계. 한국심리학회 연차학술 발표대회 논문집, pp.296-297. 8월 21일. 서울: 육균사관학교 흥무관.

13.

최경숙 (1990). 직관적, 분석적 사고의 발달 특성에 관한 연구. 사회과학, 30(1), 187-200.

14.

Bruner, J. (1963). The process of education. NY: Vintage Books.

15.

Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Styles of thinking, ability, and academic performance. Exceptional Children, 63(3), 295- 312.

16.

Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The big five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 869-879.

17.

Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329-358.

18.

Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Mental self-government: A theory of intellectual styles and their development. Human Development, 31, 197-224.

19.

Sternberg, R. J. (1990). Thinking styles: Keys to understanding student performance. Phi Delta Kappan, 71, 366-371.

20.

Sternberg, R. J. (1992). CAT: A program of comprehensive abilities testing. In B. R. Gifford & M. C. O'Connor (Eds.), Changing assessments: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement and instruction (pp.213-274). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

21.

Sternberg, R. J. (1994a). Allowing for thinking styles. Educational Leadership, 52(3), 36-40.

22.

Sternberg, R. J. (1994b). Thinking styles: Theory and assessment at the interface between intelligence and personality. In R. J. Sternberg & P. Ruzgis (Eds.), Personality and intelligence (pp.169-187). NY: Cambridge University Press.

23.

Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking styles. NY: Cambridge University Press.

24.

Sternberg, R. J., & Wagner, R. K. (1991). MSG thinking styles inventory. Unpublished manual.

25.

Van Scotter, J. R., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5), 525-531.

26.

Zhang, L. F. (2000). Are thinking styles and personality types related. Educational Psychology, 20(3), 271-283.

27.

Zhang, L. F. (2002a). Measuring thinking styles in addition to measurung personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 445- 458.

28.

Zhang, L. F. (2002b). Thinking styles and modes of thinking: Implication for education and research. Journal of Psychology, 136(3), 245-261.

29.

Zhang, L. F. (2006). Thinking styles and the big five personality traits revisited. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1177-1187.

30.

Zhang, L. F., & Huang, J. (2001). Thinking styles and the five factor model of personality. European Journal of Personality, 15, 465-476.

31.

Zhang, L. F., & Sachs, J. (1997). Assessing thinking styles in the theory of mental self-government: A Hong Kong validity study. Psychological Report, 81, 915-928.

logo