바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

Moderating Effect of Speed Desire Frustration on the Relationship between Driving Stress and Coping Behavior on Traffic Accident Risk

Abstract

The present study was conducted to determine the effects of driving stress on traffic accident risk. Specifically, the study verified whether a driver's speed desire frustration plays a control role in the relations between driving stress and traffic accident risk. As a result, a driver's speed desire frustration level played a control role in the relation between driving stress and traffic accident risk. This indicates that a driver's speed desire frustration level change driving stress sensitivities, thus changing the effects of selecting coping behavior types and causing differences in total traffic accident risk. The results show that the mere concentration on driving stress management cannot sufficiently lower the traffic accident risks caused by driving stress. This is because driving stress have indirect influences on traffic accident risk. Hence, it will be necessary to seek how to reduce driving stress and control coping behavior types in order to lower the traffic accidents risk by the stress.

keywords
Driving stress, Speed desire frustration, Traffic accident risk, moderating effect, 운전스트레스, 대처행동, 교통사고 위험, 속도욕구좌절

Reference

1.

Beron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.

2.

Berkowitz, L., & Lepage, A. (1967). Weapons as aggression-eliciting stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 202-207.

3.

Block, J., & Kremen, A. M. (1996). IQ and ego-resiliency: Conceptual and empirical connections and separateness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(2), 349- 361.

4.

Cooper, P. J. (1996). The relationship between speeding behaviour (as measured by violation convictions) and crash involvement. Journal of Safety Research, 28(2), 83-95.

5.

Desmond, P. A., Matthews, G, & Bush, J. (2001). Individual differences in fatigue and stress states in two field studies of driving. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting, 1571- 1575.

6.

Hoare, P. N. (2001). Stress traits and coping styles as predictors of stress symptoms in bus driver. University of Southern Queensland. Australia.

7.

Kontogiannis, T. (2006). Patterns of driver stress and coping strategies in a Greek sample and their relationship to aberrant behaviors and traffic accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38, 913-924.

8.

Korea Road Traffic Authority (1998). A package of measures for the overspeed prevention.

9.

Lazarus, R., & Folkman, S. (1986). Stress and adaptational outcomes: The problem of confounded measures. American Psychologist, 40(7), 770-779.

10.

Lazarus, R., & Folkman, S., (1991). Coping and emotion. In A. Monat & Lazarus(Eds.), Stress and coping: An anthology (pp.207-227). New York: Columbia University.

11.

Lee, S. Y., & Lee, S. C. (2008). Validation and Development of the Driving Stress Scale. Korean Journal of Psychological and Social Issues, 14(3), 21-40.

12.

Lee, S. Y., & Lee, S. C. (2009a). The change of traffic accident risk degree by driving stress coping patterns. Korean Journal of Psychological and Social Issues, 15(3), 431-446.

13.

Lee, S. Y., & Lee, S. C. (2009b). The influences of Speed desire frustration on Driving Stress. Korean Journal of Psychological and Social Issues, 15(2), 319-338.

14.

Lee, S. Y., & Lee, S. C. (2010). A validation study and confirmatory factor analysis of the traffic accident risk index. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 23(1), 75-87.

15.

Lee, S. Y., Lee, S. C., & Song, H.W. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Traffic Accident Risk Index(TARI). International Conference on Asia Pacific Psychology (ICAPP), 207-208.

16.

Parker, D., Reason, J. T., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1995). Behavioral characteristics and involvement in different types of traffic accident. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 27, 571-581.

17.

Rumar, K. (1985). The role of perceptual and cognitive filters in observed behavior. In Evans, L., Schwing, R. C., editors, Human Behavior and Traffic Safety, New York, NY: Plenum Press, pp.151-165.

18.

Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1988). Scaling corrections for chi-square statistics in covariance structure analysis. In American Statistical Association 1988 Proceedings of the Business and economic section (pp.308-313). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.

19.

Shadish, W. R., & Sweeney, R. (1991). Mediators and moderators in meta-analysis: There’s a reason we don’t let dodo birds tell us which psychotherapies should have prizes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 883-893.

20.

Stradling, S. G., Meadows, M. L., & Beatty, S. (1999). Factors affecting car use choices. Transport Research Institute. Napier University: UK.

21.

Stradling, S. G., Meadows, M. L., & Beatty, S. (2004). Characteristics and crash-involvement of seeding, violating and thrill-seeking drivers. Traffic and Transport Psychology Proceedings of the ICTTP 2000, 177-192.

22.

Underwood, G., Chapman, P., Wright, S., & Crundall, D. (1999). Anger While driving. Transportation Research, PartF, 2, 55-68.

23.

Westeman, S. J., & Haigney, D. (2000). Individual differences in driver stress, error and violation. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 991-998.

24.

Williams, A., Kyrychenko, S., & Retting, R. (2006). Characteristics of speeders. Journal of Safety Research, 37, 227-232.

logo