ISSN : 1229-0696
This study examined the effects of reinforcement delay and rule explicitness on performance. A 2 (immediate vs. delayed reinforcement) x 2 (explicit vs. implicit rule) factorial design was used. Eighty college students were recruited as participants and were randomly assigned to the four experimental groups. They performed a simulated work task and the dependent variable was the number of the work task correctly completed. Results indicated that in the delayed reinforcement condition, performance for the group who was given an explicit rule was higher than that for the group who was given an implicit rule. In the immediate reinforcement condition, however, performance for both groups was comparable.
이종한, 이종구, 석동현 (2011). 조직 안전풍토의 확인 및 안전행동과의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 24(3), 627-650.
오세진 (1997). 효율적 산업안전관리를 위한 행동주의적 연구에 대한 개관. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 10(1), 1-20.
최인섭, 이계훈, 오세진 (2013). 팀 업무 수행과 보상의 유관성 수준이 사회적 태만 행동에 미치는 효과. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 26(1), 103-118.
Baron, A., & Galizio, M. (1983). Instructional control of human operant behavior. The Psychological Record, 33, 495-520.
Baum, W. (1992). For parsimony's sake: Comments on Mallot's “A theory of rule-governed behavior and organizational behavior management”. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 12(2), 81-84.
Braam, C., & Malott, R. W. (1990). “I'll do it when the snow melts”: The effects of deadlines and delayed outcomes on rulegoverned behavior in preschool children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 67-76.
Brown, M. G., Malott, R. W., Dillon, M. J., & Keeps, E. J. (1980). Improving customer service in a large department store through the use of training and feedback. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 2, 251-266.
Buehner, M. J., & May, J. (2004). Abolishing the effects of reinforcement delay on human casual learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57B, (2), 179-191.
Catania, A. C., Shimoff, E., & Matthews, B. A. (1989). An experimental analysis of rulegoverned behavior. In S. C. Hays (Eds.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control, (pp.119-150). New York: Plenum Press.
Chung, S. H. (1965). Effects of delayed reinforcement in a concurrent choice situation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 8, 439-444.
Clayton, M. C., & Helms, B. P. (2009). Increasing seat belt use on a college campus: An evaluation of two prompting procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42(1), 161-164.
Crombie, S. D., & Baker, L. J. V. (1997). The behavioural self-control of study in third-level students: A review. In: Dillenburger, K., O'Rielly, M. (Eds.), Advances in Behavior Analysis. Ireland, Dublin: University College Dublin Press.
Daniels, A. C., & Daniels, J. E. (2004). Performance management: Changing behavior that drives organizational effectiveness. Atlanta, GA: Audrey Daniels International.
Fester, C. B. (1953). Sustained behavior under delayed reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45(4), 218-224.
Galizio, M. (1979). Contingency-shaped and rule-governed behavior: Intructional control of human loss avoidance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 31, 53-70.
Geller, E. S. (2000). The psychology of safety handbook. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.
Goomas, D. T. (2012). Immediate feedback on accuracy and performance: The effects of wireless technology on food safety tracking at a distribution center. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 32(4), 320-328.
Goomas, D. T., Smith, W. M., & Ludwig, T. D. (2008). Business activity monitoring: Real time group goal and feedback using an overhead svorebord in a distribution center. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 31(3), 196-209.
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Green, L., Fisher, E. B., Perlow, S., & Sherman, L (1981). Preference reversal and self-control: Choice as a function of reward amount and delay. Behavior Analysis Letter, 1, 43-51.
Hayes, S. C., & Ju, W. (1998). The applied implications of rule-governed behavior, in: O'Donohue, W. T. (Ed). Learning and Behavior Therapy, Allyn & Bacon, MA.
Horne, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1996). On the origin of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185-241.
Houmanfar, R., & Johnson, R. A. (2003). Organizational implication of gossip and rumor. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 23(2-3), 117-138.
Kerr, K. P. J., & Keenan, M. (1997). Rules and rule-governance: New directions in the theoretical and experimental analysis of human behavior. In: Dillenburger, K., O'Rielly, M. (Eds), Advances in Behavior Analysis. Ireland, Dublin: University College Dublin Press.
Lattal, K. A., & Suzanne, G. (1990). Response acquisition with delayed reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16(1), 27-39.
Madden, G. J., Chase, P. N., & Joyce, J. H. (1998). Making sense of sensitivity in the human operant literature. The Behavior Analyst, 21(1), 1-12.
Malott, R. W. (1993). A theory of rule-governed behavior and organizational behavior management. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 12(2), 45-65.
Malott, R. W., & Malott, M. E. (1991). Private events and rule-governed behavior. Dialogues on Verbal Behavior. (pp.237-254). Reno, NV: Context Press.
Malott, R. W., Shimamune, S., & Malott, M. E. (1993). Rule-governed behavior and organizational management. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 12(2), 103-116.
Mason, M. A., & Redmon, W. K. (1993). Effects of immediate versus delayed feedback on error detection accuracy in a quality control sitimulation. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 13(1), 49-83.
Michael, J. K. (2004). Concepts and principles of behavior analysis. Kalamazoo, MI: Society for the Advancement of Behavior Analysis.
Mischel, W., & Grusec, J. (1967). Waiting for rewards and punishments: Effects of time and probability on choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(1), 24-31.
Ninness, H. A. C., & Ninness, R. (1998). Supersititionus math performance. The Psychological Record, 48, 45-62.
Pelaez, M., & Moreno, R. (1998). A taxonomy of rules and their correspondence to rulegoverned behavior. Revista Mexicana de analisis de la conducta, 24(2), 197-214.
Perrin, C. J., & Neef, n, A. (2012). Futher analysis of variables that affects self-control with aversive events. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45(2), 299-313.
Rachlin, H., & Green, L. (1972). Commitment, choice and self-control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 17, 15-22.
Rachlin, H., Raineri, A., & Cross, D. (1991). Subjective probability and delay. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55(2), 233-244.
Ragotzy, S. P., Blakely, E., & Poling, A. (1988). Self-control in mentally retared adolescents: Choice as a function of amount and delay of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49(2), 191-199.
Reid, D. H., & Parsons, M. B. (1996). A comparison of staff acceptability of immediate versus delayed verbal feedback in staff training. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 16(2), 35-47.
Reitman, D., & Gross, A. M. (1996). Delayed outcomes and rule-governed behavior among noncomliant and compliant boys: A replication and extension. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 13, 65-77.
Shimoff, E., & Catania, A. C., & Matthews, B. A. (1981). Unistructed human responding: Sensitivity of low-rate performance to schedule contingencies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 36, 207-220.
Shimp, C. P. (1969). The concurrent reinforcement of two interresponse times: The relative harmonic length. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12 401-411.
Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New York: Applenton-Century-Croft.
Snycerski, S., Laraway, S., Huitema, B., & Poling, A. (2004). The effects of behavioral history on response acquisition with immediate and delayed reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 81(1). 51-64.
Williams, B. A. (1976). The effects of unsignalled delayed reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 26(3), 441-449.