바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

메뉴

긍정적 경험에 대한 사후가정사고가 삶의 의미와 주관적 안녕감에 미치는 영향

The Effect of Counterfactual Thinking about Positive Experiences on Meaning in Life and Subjective Well-being

초록

본 연구는 긍정적 경험에 대한 사후가정사고가 삶의 의미와 주관적 안녕감에 미치는 영향을 살펴보았다. 이를 위해 349명의 대학생들을 대상으로 사전 설문을 하여 동질성 검정 이후 집단별 처치를 실시하였다. 실험집단은 긍정적 경험을 회상한 후 사후가정사고 처치를 하였고, 비교집단은 긍정적 경험을 회상한 후 사실적 사고 처치를 하였다. 통제집단은 중립적 경험에 대하여 의견을 기술하는 처치를 하였다. 측정도구로는 삶의 의미 척도와 주관적 안녕감 척도를 사용하였다. 사전 설문 후 집단 동질성을 검정하기 위하여 일원변량분석을 실시하였고, 집단별 처치 후 다변량 분산분석을 실시하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 긍정적 경험에 대하여 사후가정사고 처치를 한 실험집단이 비교집단과 통제집단보다 유의하게 높은 삶의 의미 발견과 긍정 정서를 나타냈다. 둘째, 긍정적 경험에 대하여 사후가정사고 처치를 한 실험집단이 통제집단보다 유의하게 높은 삶의 만족을 나타내었다. 끝으로 본 연구의 의의 및 제한점과 향후 연구방향을 기술하였다.

keywords
사후가정사고, 삶의 의미, 주관적 안녕감, counterfactual thinking, meaning in life, subjective well-being

Abstract

This study examined effect of counterfactual thinking about positive experiences on meaning in life and subjective well-being. For this purpose, 349 college students were assigned into three groups. The experimental group performed counterfactual thinking whereas the comparing group performed factual thinking after reflecting on positive experiences. The control group reported their opinions on an event with neutral valence. To examine effect of these distinct interventions, the three groups responded to presence of meaning and subjective well-being scales. The results of this study were as follows. The counterfactual thinking group presented significantly greater presence of meaning in life and positive affect than the factual thinking and control groups. Additionally, the counterfactual thinking group presented significantly greater satisfaction in life than the control group. Finally, implications and limitations of this study are discussed with suggestions for future research.

keywords
사후가정사고, 삶의 의미, 주관적 안녕감, counterfactual thinking, meaning in life, subjective well-being

참고문헌

1.

김경미, 조진형 (2012). 보육교사 교육생의 감사편지 쓰기 효과. 한국심리학회지: 상담및 심리치료, 24(4), 807-825.

2.

김경희, 이희경 (2013). 의미추구와 긍정정서가의미발견에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지:일반, 32(1), 107-124.

3.

류연지 (1996). 성격 및 욕구수준이 주관적 안녕에 미치는 영향. 연세대학교 석사학위논문.

4.

심미성 (2006). 스트레스 완충 자원으로서 삶의의미의 역할. 가톨릭대학교 석사학위논문.

5.

오은아, 박기환 (2011). 사후가정사고와 사고통제방략이 외상 후 성장에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 16(3), 577-593.

6.

원두리, 김교헌, 권선중 (2005). 한국판 삶의의미척도의 타당화 연구: 대학생을 대상으로. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 10(2), 211-225.

7.

이유정 (1994). 성격특질이 기분의 수준 및 변화성에 미치는 영향. 중앙대학교 박사학위논문.

8.

이현희, 김은정, 이민규 (2003). 한국판 정적정서 및 부적 정서 척도(Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule; PANAS)의 타당화연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 22(4), 935-946.

9.

한소영, 신희천 (2009). 대학생이 지각한 부모-자녀 관계에서의 기본 심리적 욕구 만족감이 주관적 안녕감에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 21(2), 439-464.

10.

허태균 (2002). 사후가정사고의 심리적 기능과응용적 가치. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 8(2), 171-190.

11.

Anderson, M. R. (1977). A study of the relationship between life satisfaction and self-concept, locus of control, satisfaction with primary relationships, and work satisfaction (Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, 1977). Dissertation Abstracts International, 38, 2638 9A. (University Microfilms No. 77-25, 214)

12.

Arkes, H. R., Boehm, L. E., & Xu, G. (1991). Determinants of judged validity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 576-605.

13.

Battista, J., & Almond, R. (1973). The development of meaning in life. Psychiatry, 36, 409-427.

14.

Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2002). The pursuit of meaningfulness in life. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez. (Eds), Handbook of positive psychology (pp.608-618). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

15.

Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine.

16.

Burton, C. M., & King, L A. (2004). The health benefits of writing about intensely positive experiences. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 150-163.

17.

Currier, J., Holland, J., & Neimeyer, R. (2006). Sense-making, grief, and the experience of violent loss: Toward a mediational model. Death Studies, 30, 403-428.

18.

Debats, D. L., Van Der Lubbe, P. M., & Wezeman, F. R. A. (1993). On the psychometric properties of the Life Regard Index (LRI): a measure of meaningful life. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 337-345.

19.

Debats, D. L., Drost, J., & Hansen, P. (1995). Experiences of meaning in life: A combined qualitative and quantitative approach. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 359-374.

20.

Diener, E. & Emmons, R. A. (1984). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 851-864.

21.

Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.

22.

Draucker, C. B. (1989). Cognitive adaptation of female incest survivors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 668-670.

23.

Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1986). Judging probable cause. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 3-19.

24.

Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Counting blessings versus burdens:Experimental studies of gratitude and subjective well-being in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 377-389.

25.

Epstude, K., & Roese, N. J. (2008). The functional theory of counterfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 168-192.

26.

Frankl, V. E. (1984). Man’s search for meaning (3rd ed.). New York: First Washington Square Press. (Original Work published 1963)

27.

Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218-226.

28.

Giannopoulos, V. L., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2011). Effects of positive interventions and orientations to happiness on subjective well-being. Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(2), 95-105.

29.

Gleicher, F., Kost, K. A., Baker, S. M., Strathman, A. J., Richman, S. A., & Sherman, S. J. (1990). The role of counterfactual thinking in judgments of affect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 284-295.

30.

Hasher, L., Goldstein, D., & Toppino, T. (1977). Frequency and the conference of referential validity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 107-112.

31.

Heine, S. J., Proulx, T., & Vohs, K. D. (2006). Meaning maintenance model: On the coherence of human motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 88-110.

32.

Heintzelman, S. J., Christopher, J., Trent, J., & King, L. A. (2013). Counterfactual thinking about one's birth enhances well-being judgements. Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(1), 44-49.

33.

Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992). Shattered assumptions:Towards a new psychology of trauma, New York:The Free Press.

34.

Kashdan, T. B., Biswas-Diener, R., & King, L. A. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: The costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia. Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 219-233.

35.

King, L. A. & Hicks, J. A. (2009). The detection and construction of meaning in life events. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 317-330.

36.

King, L. A., Hicks, J. A., Krull, J. L., & Del Gaiso, A. K. (2006). Positive affect and the experience of meaning in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 179-196.

37.

King, L. A., & Napa, C., K. (1998). What makes a life good? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 156-165.

38.

Koo, M., Algoe, S., Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2008). It's a wonderful life: Mentally subtracting positive events improves people's affective states, contrary to their forecasts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1217-1224.

39.

Kray, L. J., Galinsky, A. D., & Markman, K. D. (2009). Counterfactual structure and learning from experience in negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 979-982.

40.

Kray, L. J., Galinsky, A. D., & Wong, E. (2006). Thinking inside the box: The relational processing style elicited by counterfactual mind-sets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1217-1224.

41.

Kray, L. J., George, L., Liljenquist, K. A., Galinsky, A., Telock, P., & Roese, N. (2010). From What might have been to what must have been: Counterfactual thinking creates meaning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 106-118.

42.

Lyubomirsky, S., Sousa, L., Dickerhoof, R. (2006). The costs and benefits of writing, talking, and thinking about life’s triumphs and defeats. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 692-708.

43.

Markman, K. D., Garanski, I., Sherman, S. J., & McMullen, M. N. (1993). The mental simulation of better and worse possible worlds. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 87-109.

44.

Markman, K. D., Lindberg. M. J., Kray, L. J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2007). Implications of counterfactual structure for creative generation and analytical problem solving. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 312-324.

45.

Markman, K. D., & McMullen, M. N. (2003). A reflection and evaluation model of comparative thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 244-267.

46.

Mascaro, N., & Rosen, D. H. (2006). The role of existential meaning as a buffer against stress. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 46, 168-190.

47.

McMullen, M. N. (1997). Affective contrast and assimilation in counterfactual thinking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 77-100.

48.

Park, C. L. (2010). Making Sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 257-301.

49.

Roses, N. J., & Hur, T. (1997). Affective determinants of counterfactual thinking. Social Cognition, 15, 274-290.

50.

Routledge, C., Arndt, J., Wildschut, T., Juhl, J., Vingerhoets, A., & Schlotz, W. (2011). The Past Makes the Present Meaningful: Nostalgia as Existential Resource. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 638-652.

51.

Rozin, P. (1999). Preadaptation and the puzzles and properties of pleasure, In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology (pp.109-133). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

52.

Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60(5), 410-421.

53.

Shrira, A., Palgi, Y., Ben-Ezra, M., & Shmotkin, D. (2011). How subjective well-being and meaning in life interact in the hostile world? Journal of Positive Psychology, 6, 273-285.

54.

Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S. & Kaler, M. (2004). The development and validation of the meaning in life questionnaire. Unpublished Manuscript. University of Minnesota.

55.

Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S. & Kaler, M. (2006). The Meaning in Life Questionnaire:Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(1), 80-93.

56.

Steger, M. F. (2009). Meaning in life. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp.679-687). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

57.

Summerville, A., & Roses, N. J. (2008). Dare to compare: Fact-based versus simulation-based comparison in daily life. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 664-671.

58.

Teigen, K. H., (1997). Luck, envy, and gratitude:It could have been different. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 38, 235-248.

59.

Warr, P., Barter, J., & Brownbridge, G. (1983). On the independence of negative and positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 644-651.

60.

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.

61.

Wilson, W. (1967). Correlates of avowed happiness. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 294-306.

62.

Wong, P. T. P. (2010). Meaning therapy: an integrative and positive existential psychotherapy. Journal of Contemporary Psychology, 40, 85-93.

63.

Zika, S., & Chamberlain, K. (1987). Relation of hassles and personality to subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 155-162.

logo