바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

ISSN : 1229-067X

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.28 No.1

Citation Share

The Application of Culture bounded Self-construal Model: A Comparative study between three countries in Northeast Asia

Korean Journal of Psychology: General / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2009, v.28 no.1, pp.49-66
(Clark University)



& (2009). The Application of Culture bounded Self-construal Model: A Comparative study between three countries in Northeast Asia. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 28(1), 49-66.

Abstract

The most powerful model of self-construal, namely independent self and interdependent self seems useful only when it is related to individualism and collectivism, and is somehow insufficient to illustrate the psychological diversity among countries sharing the same culture. Researchers of current study proposed an alternative model of self-construal (SOA model) to find out a better frame than independent and interdependent model. The current study was designed to distinguish the subtle differences of self-construal among 3 countries within same collectivistic culture, which were hardly explained by the dichotomous model. The data of 462 participants was used for one-way ANOVA and correlation analysis. The results showed that Korean and Chinese had similar scores in Subjectivity (S) and were both higher than Japanese students, while in the respect of Objectivity (O), Japanese students’ score was highest, followed by Korean and Chinese students. The pattern related to Autonomy (A) was similar to that of subjectivity. In the correlation between self-esteem and three factors of SOA, different patterns occurred among these countries. For Korean, subjectivity and autonomy had a positive correlation, while objectivity had a negative correlation with self-esteem. Japanese showed a positive correlation between subjectivity and self-esteem as well as a negative correlation between objectivity and self-esteem. There was no significant correlation between autonomy and self-esteem on Japanese samples. As to Chinese, the patterns of correlation were similar with those of Korean participants. In the future, studies on the comparison among western countries are required to testify the SOA model one step further.

keywords
self-construal, subjective, objective, autonomous, comparison between countries, self-construal, subjective, objective, autonomous, comparison between countries, 문화-자기관, 주체성-대상성-자율성, 국가 간 비교, 비교문화심리학

Reference

1.

정남운 (2005). 대인관계 형용사 척도 타당화 연구, 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 17(3), 583-598.

2.

이누미야 요시유키 (2004). 한일 비교 성격론. 인본연구, 11, 101-124.

3.

이누미야 요시유키, 김윤주 (2006). 긍정적 환상의 한일비교: 주체성 자기와 대상성 자기에 의한 설명. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 20(4), 19-34.

4.

이누미야 요시유키, 최일호, 윤덕환, 서동효, 한성열 (1999). 비현실적 낙관성(unrealistic optimism) 경향에 있어서의 비교 문화 연구: 상호독립적-상호협조적 자기관과의 관계를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 13(1), 183-201.

5.

이누미야 요시유키, 한민, 이주희, 이다인, 김소혜 (2007). 주체성-대상성-자율성 자기 척도의 개발, 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 21(2), 17-34

6.

정욱, 한규석 (2005). 자기고양 현상에 대한 조절변인으로서 자존감. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 19(1), 199-216.

7.

조긍호 (2002). 문화성향과 허구적 독특성 지각 경향. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 16(1), 91-111.

8.

조긍호, 명정완 (2001). 문화성향과 자의식의 유형. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 15(2), 111-139.

9.

조선영, 이누미야 요시유키, 김재신, 최일호 (2005). 한국과 일본에서 상호독립적-상호협조적 자기관이 대인불안에 미치는 영향: 자기존중감과 공적자기의식의 매개효과를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 19(4), 49-60.

10.

高田利武(다카타 토시타케)․大本美千惠(오오모토 미치에)․淸家美紀(세이케 미키) (1996). 相互獨立的-相互協調的自己觀尺度(改訂版) の作成. 奈良大學ｿ紀要, 24, 157-173.

11.

Baumeister, R, F., Tice, D. M., & Hutton, D. G. (1989). Cognitive processes during deliberate self-presentation: How self-presenters alter and misinterpret the behavior of their interaction partners. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 25(1), 59-78

12.

Cross, S. E., Bacon, P. L., & Morris, M. L. (2000). The relational-interdependent self- construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 78(4), 791-808.

13.

Devos, G. A. (1973). Socialization for achievement. Berkely: University of Californial Press.

14.

Heine, S. J. & Lehman, D. R. (1995). Cultural variation in unrealistic optimism: Does the west feel more invulnerable than the east? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 595-607.

15.

Heine, S. J., & Lehman, D. R. (1997). The cultural construction of self-enhancement: An examination of group-serving biases. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 72(6), 1268-1283.

16.

Heine, S. J., Kitayama, S., Lehman, D. R., Takata, T., Ide, E., Leung, C., & Matsumoto, H. (2001). Divergent consesequences of success and failure in Japan and North America. An investigation of self-improving motivations and malleable selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 599-615.

17.

Hsu, F. L. K. (1981). Americans and Chinese: Passage to differences. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.

18.

Kwan, V. S. Y., Bond, M. H., & Singelis, T. M. (1997). Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction: Adding relationship harmony to self-esteem, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1038-1051.

19.

Levine, T. R., Bresnahan, M. J., Park, H. S., Lapinski, M. K., Wittenbaum, G. M., Shearman, S. M., Lee, S. Y., Chung, D., Ohashi, R. (2003). Self-Construal Scales Lack Validity. Human Communication Research, 29(2), 210-252.

20.

Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991a). Culture and self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.

21.

Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

22.

Triandis, H. C., (1988), Collectivism vs. individualism: A reconceptualization of a basic concept in cross-cultural social psychology, in G. K. Verma and C. Bagley(Eds.), Cross-cultural Studies of Personality, Attitudes and Cognition(pp.60-95). London: Macmillan.

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

e-Submission OA Policy