바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

여성의 범죄자화 과정에 대한 소고

A review on famale's criminalization trajectories

한국심리학회지: 일반 / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2011, v.30 no.3, pp.909-932
이수정 (경기대학교)
양원석 (경기대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

본 연구의 목적은 최근 우리나라에서 발견되는 여자 청소년 범죄자들의 증가추세를 여성주의적 시각에서 비판적으로 살펴보고, 형사사법의 기조 변화가 최근 눈에 띄는 여성 범죄자들의 증가추이와 어떻게 유관한 것인지 확인해보고자 하였다. 이를 위하여 여성주의 범죄학의 관련 문헌을 리뷰하고 미국의 사법제도 내에서도 형사정책적 강경화 정책이 여성 범죄자 수의 추이를 어떻게 변경하였는지 그리고 그와 유사한 패턴이 우리나라의 사법기조에도 발생하고 있는지 살펴보았다. 일부 자료는 국내의 범죄통계를 바탕으로 재구성되었으나 연구의 논리적 구조는 대체로 문헌연구를 기반으로 하였다.

keywords
Female juvenile offenders, feminist criminology, gender bias, criminal justice trajectories, 여자 청소년범죄자, 여성주의범죄학, 성 편견, 범죄자화 과정

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to critically examine the number of female juvenile offenders' increasing trend that recently found in Korean at feminism criminological point of view, and to confirm change of criminal justice's basis ware significantly associated with growth of female offender. To achieve this, we review literature related to feminist criminology and examine which criminal policy was related to increase of female offender in criminal jurisdiction of the United States and whether similar pattern was found in the Korean criminal justice's basis. Some data were reconstructed by applying Korean official statistics, but logical structure of this study was almost based on literature study.

keywords
Female juvenile offenders, feminist criminology, gender bias, criminal justice trajectories, 여자 청소년범죄자, 여성주의범죄학, 성 편견, 범죄자화 과정

참고문헌

1.

김은영 (2002). 성매매와 형사정책의 기본방향: 성매매에 관한 페미니즘 담론과 형사정책적 딜레마, 형사정책 14(2), 37-73.

2.

손지선, 이수정 (2007). 가족살해 가해자의 특성과 양형요인에 대한 연구. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 21(1), 1-18.

3.

신연희, 이백철 (2008). 여자 비행청소년의 성적 학대에 대한 치유프로그램 개발에 관한 연구. 법무부.

4.

이승현 (2007). 소년보호이념의 변화경향에 관한 고찰-최근 소년법 개정을 중심으로-. 법학논총, 24(4), 131-150.

5.

임상규 (2005). 성매매특별법의 필요성과 문제. 형사정책, 17(1), 179-201

6.

전영실 (2002) 여자비행 청소년의 교정처우 실태에 관한 연구, 한국형사정책연구원.

7.

정부발의, 소년법일부개정법률안, 국회의안정보시스템 http://likms.assembly.go.kr/bill/jsp/ BillDe-tail.jsp?bill_id=PRC_P0F7J1R1E0L1E1K6U4N1O1S9F6D0R1

8.

정종순, 황선희, 김민정, 이종수 (2010). 여자 비행청소년의 성적학대 치유프로그램 개발. 소년보호연구, 10, 399-496.

9.

최종식 (2008). 제6차 소년법개정의 문제점에 대한 고찰. 형사정책, 2008

10.

정희철(2008). 개정 소년법과 소년사법의 효율성, 고려법학, 2008, 327-346

11.

Beitchman, J. H., Zucker, K. J., Hood, J. E., daCosta, G. A,, Akman, D., & Cassavia, E. (1992). A review of the long-term effects of child sexual abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 16, 101-118

12.

Belknap, J., Holsinger, K., & Dunn, M. (1997). Understanding incarcerated girls: The results of a focus group study. Prison Journal, 77, 381-404.

13.

Bernstein, Nagel, I., Kick, E., Leung, J.T., & Schulz, B. (1977). Charge reduction: An intermediate state in the process of labeling criminal defendants. Social Forces, 56 (2), 362-384.

14.

Bishop, D. M., & Frazier, C. E. (1992). Gender bias in juvenile justice processing: Implications of the JJDP Act. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82, 1162-1186.

15.

Bloom, B.; and Covington, S. (1998) “Gender-specific programming for female offenders: what is it and why is it important?” Paper presented at the 50th annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Washington, DC.

16.

Bloom, B., Owen, B., and Covington, S. (2001). Gender-responsive strategies: Research, practice, and guiding principles for women offenders project. Draft. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Corrections

17.

Bloom, B., Owen, B., & Covington, S. (2004). Women offenders and the gendered effects of public policy. Review of Policy Research, 1, 31-48.

18.

Bowker, L.H. (1978). Women, crime and the criminal justice system. Lexington, MA:Heath.

19.

Chesney-Lind, M. (1977). Judicial paternalism and the female status offender: Training women to know their place. Crime & Delinquency, 23, 121-130.

20.

Chesney-Lind, M. (1997). The Female Offender: Girls, Woman, and Crime. ThousandOak, California: Sage

21.

Chesney-Lind, M. (1999). Contextualizing women’s violence and aggression: Beyond denial and demonization. [Editorial]. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 22, 222-223.

22.

Chesney-Lind, M., & Pasko, L. (2004). Girls, women, and crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

23.

Chesney-Lind, M., Morash, M., & Stevens, T. (2008). Girls’ troubles, girls’ delinquency, and gender responsive programming: A review. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 41(1), 162-189.

24.

Crew, B. K. (1991). Sex differences in criminal sentencing: Chivalry or patriarchy? Justice Quarterly, 8, 59-84.

25.

Daly, K. (1987). Discrimination in the criminal courts: Family, gender, and the problem of equal treatment. Social Forces, 66, 152–175.

26.

Daly, K., & Chesney-Lind, M. (1988). Feminism and criminology. Justice Quarterly, 5, 497-538.

27.

Daly, K., & Bordt, R. L. (1995). Sex effects and sentencing: An analysis of the statistical literature. Justice Quarterly, 12, 141-176.

28.

Demuth, S., & Steffensmeier, D. (2004). The impact of gender and race-ethnicity in the pretrial release process. Social Problems, 51, 222-242.

29.

Feld, B. C. (2009). Violent girls or relabeled status offenders? An alternative interpretation of the data. Crime & Delinquency, 55, 241-265.

30.

Gamble, T. J., Sonnenberg, S., Haltigan, J. D., & Cuzzola-Kern, A. (2002). Detention screening: Prospects for population management and the examination of disproportionality by race, age, and gender. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 13, 380-395.

31.

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109-118.

32.

Herzog, S., & Oreg, S. (2008). Chivalry and the moderating effect of ambivalent sexism: Individual differences in crime seriousness judgments. Law & Society Review, 42, 45-74.

33.

Horowitz, R., & Pottieger, A. E. (1991). Gender bias in juvenile justice handling of seriously crime-involved youths. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 28, 75-100.

34.

Javdani, S., Sadeh, N., & Verona, E. (2010). Expanding our lens: Female pathways to antisocial behavior in adolescence and adulthood. Manuscript under review.

35.

Javdani, S., Sadeh, N,, & Verona, E. (2011). Gendered social forces: A review of the impact of institutionalized factors on women and girls' criminal justice trajectories. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17(2), 161-211.

36.

Johnson, D. R., & Scheuble, L. K. (1991). Gender bias in the disposition of juvenile court referrals: The effects of time and location. Criminology, 29, 677-699. doi:10.1111/j.1745- 9125.1991.tb01084

37.

Kempf-Leonard, K., & Sample, L. L. (2000). Disparity based on sex: Is genderspecific treatment warranted? Justice Quarterly, 17, 89 -128.

38.

Kempf-Leonard, K., & Johansson, P. (2007). Gender and runaways: Risk factors, delinquency, and juvenile justice experiences. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 5, 308-327.

39.

Kruttschnitt, C. (1996). Contributions of quantitative methods to the study of gender and crime, or bootstrapping our way into the theoretical thicket. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 12, 135-161.

40.

Leiber, M. J. & Mack, K. Y. (2003). The individual and joint effects of race, gender, and family status on juvenile justice decision-making. Journal of Research on Crime & Delinquency, 40, 34-70.

41.

MacDonald, J. M., & Chesney-Lind, M. (2001). Gender bias and juvenile justice revisited: A multiyear analysis. Crime & Delinquency, 47, 173-195.

42.

Maher, L. (1997). Sexed work: Gender, race, and resistance in a Brooklyn drug market. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

43.

McCluskey, J. D., McCluskey, C. P., & Huebner, B. (2003). Juvenile female arrests: A holistic explanation of Organization Functioning, Women & Criminal Justice, 14(4), 35-51

44.

Miller, J. (1998). Up it up: Gender and the accomplishment of street robbery. Criminology, 36(1), 37-66.

45.

Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A, Rutter, M & Silva, P. A. (2001). Sex differences in antisocial behavior: Conduct disorder, delinquency, and violence in the Dunedin Longitudinal Study. Cambridge University Press.

46.

Moulds, E.F. (1978). Chivalry and paternalism: Disparities of treatment in the criminal justice system. Western Political Science Quarterly, 31 (3), 416-440.

47.

Mulvey, E. P., & Hicks, A. (1982). The paradoxical effect of a juvenile code change in Virginia. American Journal of Community Psychology, 10, 705–721. doi:10.1007/ BF00893915

48.

Nagel, I. H. & Hagen, J. (1982). Gender and crime: Offense patterns and criminal court sanctions. In Morris, N. & Tonry, M. (eds.), Crime and justice (pp. 91-144).Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

49.

Nagel, I. H., & Johnson, B. L. (2004). The role of gender in a structured sentencing system: Equal treatment, policy choices, and the sentencing of female offenders. In P. J. Schram & B. Koons-Witt (Eds.), Gendered (in)justice: Theory and practice in feminist criminology (pp. 198-235). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.

50.

Owen, B., & Bloom, B. (2000). Profiling the needs of young female offenders: Instrument development and pilot study—Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

51.

Puzzanchera, C., & Sickmund, M. (2008). Juvenile Court Statistics 2005. Pittsburgh, PA:National Center for Juvenile Justice.

52.

Rasche, C.E. (1974). The female offender as an object of criminological research.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 1 (4), 301-320.

53.

Rodriguez, S. F.at al (2006). Gender differences in criminal sentencing: Do effects vary across violent, property, and drug offenses? Criminology, 87, 318-339.

54.

Schur, E. M. (1983). Labeling women deviant: Gender, stigma, and social control. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

55.

Sickmund, M.at al (2004). Census of juveniles in residential placement data book. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

56.

Snyder, H. N. (2005). Juvenile Arrests 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

57.

Snyder, H. N., & Sickmund, M. (2006). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 national report. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

58.

Spohn, C., & Beichner, D. (2000). Is preferential treatment of female offenders a thing of the past? A multisite study of gender, race, and imprisonment. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 11, 149–184.!

59.

Steffensmeier, D., Kramer, J., & Streifel, C. (1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology, 31, 411-446.

60.

Steffensmeier, D., Schwarz, J., Zhong, H., & Ackerman, J. (2005). An assessment of recent trends in girls’ violence using diverse longitudinal sources: Is the gender gapclosing? Criminology, 43, 355-406.

61.

Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2006). Does gender modify the effects of race-ethnicity on criminal sanctioning? Sentences for male and female white, black, and Hispanic defendants.

62.

Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763-798.

63.

Visher, C. A. (1983). Gender, police arrest decisions, and notions of chivalry. Criminology, 21, 5-28.

64.

Widom, C. S. (1995). Victims of Childhood Sexual Abuse: Later Criminal Consequences. National Institute of Justice Research in Brief, 1-8.

65.

Widom, C. S. (2000). Child abuse and later effects. National Institute of Justice Journal, 242, 3-9.

66.

Williams, M. R. (1999). Gender and sentencing: An analysis of indicators. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 10, 471-490.

67.

Wilkie, M. (1993). Sentencing women: Pre-sentence reports and constructions of female offenders. University of Western Australia Crime Research Centre Research Report No. 9. Nedlands, Australia: University of Western Australia.

한국심리학회지: 일반