- 권한신청
- P-ISSN1229-067X
- E-ISSN2734-1127
- KCI
개정된 가치묘사질문지(PVQ-R) 한국판 타당도 연구
Validation of the Korean Version of the Portrait Values Questionnaire-Revised (PVQ-R)
이영호 (가톨릭대학교)
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
초록
본 연구에서는 Schwartz의 개정된 가치 이론(2012)에 근거하여 보편적 가치를 측정하기 위해서 개정된 가치묘사질문지(PVQ-R) 한국판의 신뢰도와 타당도를 검증하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 559명의 대학생을 대상으로 PVQ-R, Schwartz의 가치조사질문지(SVS) 및 유교가치 척도를 실시하였다. 그 결과, 19개 가치 척도는 적절한 내적 일관성 신뢰도 수준을 보였다. 각 척도의 점수와 각 문항 점수를 다차원 척도 분석한 결과, 개정된 가치 이론에서 가정한 19개 가치의 원형 구조 배열이 확인되었으며, 4개의 상위 가치 구조의 타당도가 입증되었다. 4개의 상위 가치 별로 실시한 확인적 요인분석 결과, 4개의 상위 가치의 위계적 요인 모형의 적합도가 적절한 수준으로 확인되었다. 중다특질-중다방법 분석을 통한 PVQ-R과 SVS의 수렴타당도 및 변별타당도가 전반적으로 지지되었다. 본 연구에서 얻어진 가치우선성의 순위를 Schwartz 등의 10개국 자료(2012)와 비교한 결과, 국내 자료의 평균치가 전반적으로 낮고 점수간 차이가 근소하였으나 순위 배열은 대체로 일치하였다. 유교가치는 일반적으로 자기초월 가치 및 보수 가치와 정적 상관을 보였으며, 자기고양 가치 및 변화에 대한 개방성 가치와 부적 상관을 보였다. 본 연구에서 얻어진 결과들의 의의 및 제한점 그리고 후속 연구에 대한 제언을 논의하였다.
- keywords
- Schwartz의 가치 이론, 가치묘사질문지, 가치우선성, 유교가치, Schwartz’s value theory, the Portrait Values Questionnaire-Revised, value priorities, Confucian values
Abstract
This study is intended to investigate the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Portrait Values Questionnaire-Revised(PVQ-R) measuring the basic human values based on the refined theory by Schwartz (Schwartz et al., 2012). The PVQ-R, the Schwartz's Value Survey(SVS), and the Confucian Values Scale were administered by 559 undergraduates. According to the result, adequate levels of internal consistency were shown in the reliability for the 19 value scales. Multidimensional scaling of the individual items and also of the scale means confirmed the circular structure of the 19 values and the four hierarchical values structure, respectively. Confirmatory factor analysis applied separately to each of the four higher order values revealed an adequate model fit statistics for the hierarchical factor model of the higher order value. A multitrait-multimethod analysis of the PVQ-R in comparison with the SVS generally supported convergent and discriminant validity. Comparison of the priority in value obtained from this study to the data from 10 countries(Schwartz et al., 2012) revealed that the mean ratings from the Korean sample were generally lower with the differences between the values being smaller; however, the value orders were mostly in agreement. In general, Confucian values were positively correlated with self-transcendence and negatively with self-enhancement and openness to change. The significance and limitations of findings from this study and suggestions on future research were discussed.
- keywords
- Schwartz의 가치 이론, 가치묘사질문지, 가치우선성, 유교가치, Schwartz’s value theory, the Portrait Values Questionnaire-Revised, value priorities, Confucian values
참고문헌
김연신, 최한나 (2009). Schwartz의 보편적 가치 이론의 적용 타당성 연구: 한국대학생을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 23(1), 1-16.
김철민 (1999). 가치관 연구에 관한 비판적 고찰: 개념 정의, 가치 요소의 측정방법을 중심으로. 학생생활연구, 6, 53-78.
나은영, 차유리 (2010). 한국인의 가치관 변화 추이: 1979년, 1998년, 및 2010년의 조사 결과 비교, 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 24(4), 63-93.
나은영, 차재호 (1999). 1970년대와 1990년대 간 한국인의 가치관 변화와 세대차 증감. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 13(2), 37- 60.
류수영 (2007). 한국인의 유교적 가치측정 문항 개발 연구. 인사․조직 연구, 15(4), 171-205.
박재흥, 강수택 (2012). 한국의 세대 변화와 탈물질주의: 코호트 분석. 한국사회학회지: 한국 사회학, 46(4), 69-95.
서지영, 정영숙 (2012). 연령에 따른 가치구조의 발달. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 25(2), 21- 44.
신현희 (2011). 자기초월 가치와 환경보존행동 및 친환경행동의도와의 관계. 부산대학교 석사학위논문.
심경섭 (2014). 유교가치관 척도 타당화 연구. 고려대학교 박사학위논문.
심경섭, 이누미야 요시유키, 윤상연, 서신화, 장양, 한성열 (2012). 유교가치관 척도 개발연구. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 31(2), 465- 491.
정진곤, 이관춘 (1997). 한국인의 가치관 조사모형 개발을 위한 탐색적 연구-개인의 가치와 기업체의 가치를 중심으로. 한림과학원(편), 21세기를 여는 한국인의 가치관. 서울: 소화.
조남국 (1994). Schwartz와 Bilsky의 보편적 가치구조 이론에 대한 방법적 비판: SSA의 적용. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 8(2), 55-69.
주영현 (2012). 한국 과학영재고등학생의 가치관 조사. 경남대학교 석사학위논문.
차재호 (1994). 한국사회에서의 가치관 변화와 가치에 관한 명제의 도출. 심리과학, 3(1), 1-27.
차재호, 장영수 (1992). 한국 대학생들의 중요한 가치. 한국심리학회지: 사회, 6(2), 123- 136.
최봉영 (2002). 한국 문화와 성격. 서울: 사계절.
최봉영 (2012). 한국인에게 나는 누구인가. 서울: 지식산업사.
최상진 (2000). 한국 문화심리학의 이론과 실제: 지난 20여년간의 심리학 연구를 통해서 얻은 문화심리학적 경험. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 6(3), 25-40.
최상진, 김기범 (2000). 체면의 심리구조. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 14(1), 185-202.
한덕웅, 이경성 (2003). 한국인의 인생관으로 본 가치관 변화: 30년간 비교. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 17(1), 49-67.
홍세희 (2000). 구조 방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 19(1), 161-177.
Arikan, G., & Ben-Nun Bloom, P. (2014). Social values and cross-national differences in attitudes towards welfare. Political Studies, Article first published online 8 JAN, 2014, doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12100
Arsenio, W. F., & Lemerise, E. A. (2001). Varieties of childhood bullying: Values, emotion processes, and social competence. Social Development, 10, 59-73.
Ball-Rokeach, S. J., Rokeach, M., & Grube, J. W. (1984). The great American values test: Influencing behavior and belief through television. New York: Free Press.
Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and religion. Skokie, IL: Rand McNally.
Bardi, A., Lee, J. A., Hofmann-Towfigh, N., & Soutar, G. (2009). The structure of intraindividual value change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 913-929.
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162.
Bilsky, W., Janik, M., & Schwartz, S. H., (2011). The structural organization of human values: Evidence from three rounds of the European Social Survey(ESS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 759-776.
Bond, L., Carlin, J. B., Thomas, L., Rubin, K., & Patton, G. (2001). Does bullying cause emotional problems? A prospective study of young teenagers. British Medical Journal, 323, 480-484
Brown. T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford.
Bubeck, M., & Bilsky, W. (2004). Value structure at an early age. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 63, 31-41.
Camodeca, M., & Goossens, F. A. (2005). Social cognition, anger and sadness in bullies and victims. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 186-197.
Cambell, D. T. & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
Caprara, G. V., & Steca, P. (2007). Prosocial agency: The contribution of values and self-efficacy beliefs to prosocial behavior across ages. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 218-239.
Chan, V. K. Y. (2012). The relationship between universal human values and adolescent problem and pathological gambling. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 31, 183-194.
Chan, V. K. Y. (2014). The general relationship between universal human values and adolescents' problem/pathological gambling in Macao: A parsimonious, quantitative model. Substance use and Misuse, 49, 189-201.
Cieciuch, J. C., & Davidov, E. (2012). A comparison of the invariance properties of the PVQ-40 and the PVQ-21 to measure human values across German and Polish Samples. Survey Research Methods, 6, 37-48.
Cieciuch, J. C., Davidov, E., Vecchione, M., Beierlein, C., & Schwartz, S. H. (2014). The cross-national invariance properties of a new scale to measure 19 basic human values: A test across eight countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, published online before print March 19, 2014, doi: 10.1177/0022022114527348
Cieciuch, J. C., & Schwartz, S. H. (2012). The number of distinct basic values and their structure assessed by PVQ-40. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 321-328.
Dalgaard, P. (2002). Introductory statistics with R. New York: Springer.
Davidov, E. (2008). A cross-country and cross-time comparison of the Human Values Measurements with the second round of the European Social Survey. Survey Research Methods, 2, 33-46.
Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., & Schwartz, S. H. (2008). Bringing values back in: A multiple group comparison with 20 countries using the European Social Survey. Paper delivered at the 1st European Association for Survey Research Conference, Barcelona, Spain.
Dὅring, A. K., Blauensteiner, A., Aryus, K., Drὅgekamp, L., & Bilsky, W. (2010). Assessing values at an early age: The Picture-Based Value Survey for Children. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 439-448.
Durkheim, E. (1893/1964). The division of labor in society. Glenocoe, IL: Free Press.
Feather, N. T. (1995). Values, valences and choice: The influence of values on the perceived attractiveness and choice of alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1135-1151.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Random House.
Hawley, P. H. (2007). Social dominance in childhood and adolescence: Why social competence and aggression may go hand in hand. In P. H. Hawley, T. D. Little, & P. C. Rodkin(Eds.), Aggression and adaptation. The bright side to bad behavior(pp.1-30). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hayes, S. C., & Smith, S. (2010). 마음에서 빠져나와 삶 속으로 들어가라. (민병배, 문현미 역). 서울: 학지사.
Helkama, K., Uutela, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Values system and political cognition. In G. Breakwell(Ed.), Social psychology of political and economic cognition(pp.7-32). Surry: Academic Press/Surrey University Press.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organization: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede modeling context, International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2, 1-26.
Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1988). The confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16, 5-21.
Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values, American Sociological Review, 65, 19-51.
Kenny, D. A., & McCoach, D. B. (2003). Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 333-351.
Kluckhohn, C. (1951). Values and value- orientations in the theory of action: An exploration in definition and classification. In T. Parsons & E. Shils(Eds.), Toward a general theory of action(pp.388-433). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Knafo, A. (2003). Authoritarians, the next generation: Values and bullying among adolescent children of authoritarian fathers. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 3, 199-204.
Knoppen, D., & Saris, W. (2009). Schwartz' theory of human values: Balancing homogeneity of reflective items and theoretical coverage(RECSM Working Paper No. 9, 1-40). Barcelona, Spain: University Pompeu Fabra.
Lepsley, D. K., & Power, F. C. (2005). 도덕심리학과 도덕교육. (정창우 역). 서울: 도서출판 인간사랑.
Little, B. R. (1998). Personal project pursuit: Dimensions and dynamics of personal meaning. In P. T. P. Wong & P. S. Fry(Eds.), The human quest for meaning: A handbook of psychological research and clinical applications (pp.193-212). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
Markus, H., & Oyserman, D. (1989). Gender and thought: The role of the self-concept. In M. Crawford & M. Gentry (Eds.), Gender and thought: Psychological perspectives(pp.100-127). New York: Springer Verlag.
Menesini, E., Nocentini, A., & Camodeca, M. (2013). Morality, values, traditional bullying, and cyberbullying in adolescence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 31, 1-14.
Olweus, D. (1996). Bully/victim problems at school: Facts and effective intervention. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Problems, 5, 15-22.
Oyserman, D., & Lee, S. W. S. (2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 311- 342.
Oyserman, D., Sorensen, N., Reber, R., & Chen, S. X. (2009). Connecting and separating mind-sets: Culture as situated cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 217-235.
Reijntjes, A., Kampluis, J. H., Prinze, P., & Telch, M. J. (2010). Peer victimization and internalizing problems in children: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies, Child Abuse & Neglect, 34, 244-252.
Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S. H., & Knafo, A. (2002). The Big Five personality factors and personal values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 789-801.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2000). Value priorities and subjective well-being: Direct relations and congruity effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 177-198.
Schmitt, M. J., Schwartz, S. H., Steyer, R., & Schimit, T. (1993). Measurement models for the Schwartz Values Inventory. European Journal of Personality Assessment, 9, 107-121.
Schwartz, D. (2000). Subtypes of victims and aggression in children's peer groups. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 181-192.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 25, 1-65. New York: Academic Press.
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspect in the content and structure of values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19-45.
Schwartz, S. H. (1996). Values priorities and behavior: Applying a theory of integrated values systems. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna(Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario Symposium(Vol. 8, pp.1-24). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schwartz, S. H. (2003). A proposal for measuring value orientations across nations. In Questionnaire Development Package of the European Social Survey(pp.259-319). Available from www.european-socialsurvey.org
Schwartz, S. H. (2005). Basic human values: Their content and structure across countries. In A. Tamayo & J. B. Porto(Eds.), Values and behavior in organization(pp.21-55). Petrόpolis, Brazil: Vozes.
Schwartz, S. H. (2006). Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. In R. Jowell, C. Roberts, R. Fitzgerald, & G. Eva(Eds.), Measuring attitudes cross-nationally-lessons from the European Social Survey(pp.169-203). London, UK: Sage.
Schwartz, S. H. (2009). Basic values: How the motives and inhibit prosocial behavior. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature(pp.221-241). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Schwartz, S. H. (2011). Studying values: Personal adventure, future directions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 307-319.
Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Reading in Psychology and Culture, 2. http://dx.doi.org/ 1-.9707/2307-0919.116
Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. (2001). Value hierarchies across cultures taking a similarities perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 268-290.
Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Towards a psychological structure of human value. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550-562.
Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1990). Towards a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 878-891.
Schwartz, S. H., & Boehnke, K. (2004). Evaluation the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 230-255.
Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., & Konty, M. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 663-688.
Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 32, 519-542.
Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel. T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multi-method studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1010-1028.
Schwartz, S. H., & Sagiv, L. (1995). Identifying culture specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 92-116.
Schwartz, S. H., Sagiv, L., & Boehnke, K. (2000). Worries and values. Journal of Personality, 68, 309-346.
Silfver, M., Helkama, K., Lὅnnqvist, J. E., & Verkasalo, M. (2008). The relation between value priorities and proneness to guilt, shame, and empathy. Motivation and Emotion, 32, 69-80.
Sortheix, F. M., Olakivi, A., & Helkama, K. (2013). Values, life events, and health: A study in a Finnish rural community. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23, 331-346.
Triandis, H. C. (1990). Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. In J. Berman(Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. (Vol. 37, pp.41-133). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Triandis, H. C. (2007). Culture and psychology: A history of their relationship. In S. Kitayama & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology(pp.59-76). New York: Guilford.
Vecchione, M., Casconi, T., & Barbaranelli, C. (2009). Assessing the circular structure of the Portrait Values Questionnaire: A confirmatory factor analysis approach. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25, 231-238.
Verplanken, B., & Holland, R. W. (2002). Motivated decision making: Effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 434-447.
Walker, R. B. J., (2006). On the protection of nature and the nature of protection. In J. Huysmans, A. Dobson, & R. Prokhovnik (Eds.), The politics of protection(pp.189-203). New York, NY: Routledge.
Weber, M. (1905/1958). The protestant ethic and spirit of capitalism. New York: Scribner's.
Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1999). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 126-134.
Wong, P. T. P. (1998a). Implicit theories of meaningful life and the development of the personal meaning profile. In P. T. P. Wong & P. S. Fry(Eds.), The human quest for meaning: A handbook of psychological research and clinical application(pp.111-140). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wong, P. T. P. (1998b). Meaning-centered counseling. In P. T. P. Wong & P. S. Fry(Eds.), The human quest for meaning: A handbook of psychological research and clinical application(pp.395-435). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수