바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

자기-타인 평가에서 자기해석과 종결욕구의 영향

Effects of Self-Construals and the Need for Closure on Self-Other Evaluations

초록

본 연구는 자기해석(self-construals)이 자기 및 타인평가에 미치는 영향을 분석하고 이 관계에서 종결욕구의 조절효과를 검증하였다. 168명의 연구 참가자들을 대상으로 자기해석을 측정한 후 독립적자기와 의존적자기의 실험조건으로 나누고, 종결욕구를 조작하도록 고안된 인지적 과제를 수행하게 한 다음 자신과 타인에 대해 평가하도록 하였다. 분석 결과 독립적자기의 수준이 높을수록 자기평가를 긍정적으로 하며 타인의 행동은 내부귀인하는 현상이 관찰되었다. 또한 이 관계가 종결욕구의 수준이 높아질수록 강해지는 조절효과도 관찰되었다. 본 연구의 결과는 자기해석이 행동에 미치는 영향이 고정적이지 않으며 종결욕구와 같은 상황요인에 의해서 달라진다는 점을 확인함으로써 문화구성주의가설을 지지하였다. 연구 결과를 바탕으로 조직 맥락에서 일어나는 인사평가에 대해 본 연구의 시사점들이 논의되었다.

keywords
self-evaluation, personnel evaluation, self-construals, culture, need for closure, 자기평가, 인사평가, 자기해석, 문화, 종결욕구

Abstract

The present study analyzed the relationships between self-construals on self-other evaluations and also investigated the moderating effects of the need for closure in this relationship. One hundred sixty eight participants were assigned to experimental conditions based on their self-construal scores, performed a cognitive task designed to manipulate the need for closure, were asked to evaluate their own and others' behaviors. The results showed that those with independent self evaluated themselves more positively and attributed others' behaviors more externally than those with interdependent self. It was also found that the need for closure moderated the relationships between self-construals and self-other evaluations. The results suggest that the effects of self-construals on behaviors are not fixed but vary with situational factors such as the need for closure, supporting the dynamic constructivist hypothesis of culture. Implications on personnel evaluation in organizational contexts are also discussed.

keywords
self-evaluation, personnel evaluation, self-construals, culture, need for closure, 자기평가, 인사평가, 자기해석, 문화, 종결욕구

참고문헌

1.

김정식, 송유진, 이성수 (2008). 문화점화가 자기평가에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 22(1), 179-196.

2.

박원우 (2000). 관리자 능력에 대한 본인, 상사, 부하평가의 특성과 그들 간의 관계 : 다면평가의 효과적 실시를 위한 기초적 실증연구. 인사 조직 연구, 8(1), 51-104.

3.

심재권 (2003). 공기업 근무성적 평정의 타당성 분석. 한국행정학보, 37(2), 131-153.

4.

이윤재 박영석 (2005). 평가자의 직급 및 피평가자와의 관계가 리더십 평가에 미치는 효과. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 18(1), 119-138.

5.

Aaker, J. L., & Williams, P. (1998). Empathy versus Pride: The Influence of Emotional Appeals across Cultures. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 241-261.

6.

Ahluwalia, R. (2008). How far can a brand stretch? Understanding the role of self- construal. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(3), 337-350.

7.

Allport, G. W. (1955). Becoming. New Haven: Yale University Press.

8.

Brockner, J. (1988). Self-esteem at work: Research, theory, and practice. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

9.

Brockner, J., De Cremer, D., van den Bos, K., & Chen, Y. (2005). The influence of interdependent self-construal on procedural fairness effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96, 155-167.

10.

Baumeister, R. F. (1993). Understanding the inner nature of low self-esteem: Uncertain, fragile, protective, and conflicted. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard(pp. 201-218). New York: Plenum Press.

11.

Bond, M. H., & Leung, K., & Wan, K. C. (1982). The social impact of self-effacing attributions: The Chinese case. Journal of Social Psychology, 118, 157-166.

12.

Colvin, C. R., Block, J., & Funder, D. C. (1995). Overly positive self-evaluations and personality: Negative implications for mental health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1152-1162.

13.

Chiu, C-Y., Morris, M. W., Hong, Y-Y., & Menon, T. (2000). Motivated cultural cognition: The impact of implicit cultural theories on dispositional attribution varies as a function of need for closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 247-259.

14.

Farh, J., Dobbins, G., & Cheng, B. D. (1991). Cultural relativity in action: A comparison of self-ratings made by Chinese and US workers. Personnel Psychology, 44, 129-147.

15.

Ford, T. E. & Kruglanski, A. W. (1995). Effects of epistemic motivations on the use of accessible constructs in social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(9), 950-962.

16.

Gardner, W. L., Gabriel, S., & Lee, A. Y. (1999). “I” value freedom, but “we” value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment. Psychological Science, 10, 321-26.

17.

Gililand, S. W. & Langdon, J. S. (1998). Creating performance management systems that promote perceptions of fairness. In J. W. Smither (Ed.), Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

18.

Harb, C., & Smith, P. B. (2008). Self-construals across cultures: Beyond independence- interdependence. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 178-197.

19.

Harris, M. H., & Schaubroeck, J. (1988). A meta-analysis of self-supervisory, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings. Personnel Psychology, 41, 43-62.

20.

Heine, S. J., & Hamamura, T. (2007). In search of East Asian self-enhancement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(1), 4-27.

21.

Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R. & Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychological Review, 106, 766-794.

22.

Higgins, E. T. (1997). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. E. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). New York: Guilford Press.

23.

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

24.

Hong, Y-Y., & Chiu, C-Y. (2001). Toward a paradigm shift: From Cross-cultural differences in social cognition to social-cognitive mediation of cultural differences. Social Cognition, 19(3), 181-196.

25.

Hong, Y., & Mallorie, L. M. (2004). A dynamic constructionist approach to culture: Lessons learned from personality psychology. Journal of Research in Psychology, 38, 59-67.

26.

Hong, Y., Benet-Martinez, V., Chiu, C., & Morris, M. W. (2003). Boundaries of cultural influence: Construct activation as a mechanism for cultural differences in social perception. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 453-464.

27.

James, W. (1890). The principle of psychology. New York: Dover.

28.

Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluation traits: Self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 80-92.

29.

Kim, J. S., Lee, S. S., & Gim, W-S. (2011). A cross-cultural study of self-presentation: the influence of the length and scope of an expected social relationship. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 63-74.

30.

Kim, M. S. & Leung, T. (1997). A revised version of self-construal scale. University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI.

31.

Kitayama, S., Duffy, S., & Uchida, Y. (2007). Self as Cultural Mode of Being. In S. Kitayama & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp.136-174). New York: Guilford Press.

32.

Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., Matsumoto, H., & Norasakkunkit, V. (1997). Individual and collective processes of self-esteem management: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-depreciation in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1245-1267.

33.

Korman, A. (1976). Hypothesis of work behavior revisited and an extension. Academy of Management Review, 1, 50-63.

34.

Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay Epistemic and Human Knowledge: Cognitive and Motivational Bases. NY: Plenum Press.

35.

Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing”and “freezing.” Psychological Review, 103, 263-283.

36.

Kruglanski, A. W., Webster, D. M., & Klem, A. (1993). Motivated Resistance and Openness to Persuasion in the Presence or Absence of Prior Information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 861-876.

37.

Kuhnen, U., & Oyserman, D. (2002). Thinking about the self influences thinking in general: cognitive consequences of salient self concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 492-499.

38.

Lalwani, A. K., Shavitt, S., & Johnson, T. (2006). “What is the Relation between Cultural Orientation and Socially Desirable Responding?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90 (1), 165-178.

39.

Lalwani, A. K., Shrum, L. J., & Chiu, C-Y. (2009). Motivated response style: The role of cultural values, regulatory focus, and self- consciousness in socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 870-882.

40.

Leung, K., Bond, M. H., De Carrasquel, S. R., Munoz, C., Hernandez, M., Murakami, F., & Yamaguchi, S. (2002). Social axioms: The search for universal dimensions of general beliefs about how the world functions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 286-302.

41.

Markus, H. & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224- 253.

42.

Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396.

43.

Matsumoto, D. (1999). Culture and self: An empirical assessment of Markus and Kitayama’s theory of independent and interdependent self-construals. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 289-310.

44.

Menon, T., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C, & Hong, Y. (1999). Culture and construal of agency: Attribution to individual versus group dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 701-717.

45.

Meijer, Z. Y., & Semin, G. R. (1998). When the self-serving bias does not serve the self: Attributions of success and failure in cultural perspective. Unpublished manuscript, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.

46.

Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin, 82, 213-225.

47.

Robinson, M. D., & Ryff, C. D. (1999). The role of self-deception in perceptions of past, present, and future happiness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(5), 595–606.

48.

Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 10). New York: Academic Press.

49.

Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

50.

Shore, T. H., & Thornton, G. C. (1986). Effects of gender on self-and supervisory ratings. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 115-129.

51.

Shore, T. H., Adams, J. S., & Tashchian, A. (1998). Effects of self-appraisal information, appraisal purpose, and feedback target on performance appraisal Ratings. Journal of Business and Psychology, 12(3), 283-298.

52.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations(pp.7-24). Chicago: Nelson Hall.

53.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp.33-48). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

54.

Taylor, S. E. & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.

55.

Thornton, G. C. (1980). Psychometric properties of self-appraisals of job performance. Personnel Psychology, 33, 263-271.

56.

Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520.

57.

Uleman, J. S., & Moskowitz, G. B. (1994). Unintended effects of goals on unintended inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 490-501.

58.

Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049-1062.

59.

Xie, J. L., Roy, J. P., & Chen, Z. G. (2006). Cultural and individual differences in self-rating behavior: An extension and refinement of the cultural relativity hypothesis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 341-364.

logo