ISSN : 1229-0696
This study were preformed for two purposes. The first is to develop a Korean vocational interest inventory based on Holland theory(short version) and second is to investigate of Holland's hypotheses(circular order and circumplex). With a sample of 149 high school students(male 58, female 91) and 224 college students(male 132, female 92), the main results were as follows. First, the scale which developed as 72 items in this study has shown acceptable reliabilities and construct validities, that is, this short form interest inventory could be used to verify student's vocational interest in conjunction with existing inventories. Second, the radnomization test using RANDALL(Tracey, 1997) has shown that the circular order hypothesis were supported. Third, in the results of confirmatory factor analysis, the modle that Holland's circumplex hypothesis was not adapted, has had better fit(TLI, RMSEA) than the model which Holland's circumplex hypothesis was adapted. Forth, the results of MDS showed the RIASEC interest types could be explained well through Sociaility and Confirmity of Hogan(1983). In summary, Holland's circular order hypothesis was supported but the circumplex hypothesis was not supported to Korean student's data. Finally, the implications and limitations were discussed.
김병숙, 김봉환, 김완석, 이종목 (1999). 직업심리학. 서울: 박문각.
김정택, 김명준, 심혜숙 (2001). Strong 직업흥미검사메뉴얼. 서울: 한국심리검사연구소.
박도순, 성태제, 하대현 (2000). 종합진로적성검사. 서울: 대한사립중고등학교장회.
서민희, 성태제 (2001). 한국 고등학생에 대한 Holland 직업흥미이론의 문화적 타당도 평가. 교육평가연구, 12, 237-262.
안창규 (1996a). 진로 탐색검사의 표준화를 위한 연구, 한국심리학회지: 상담과 심리치료, 8(1), 169～199.
안창규 (1996b). Holland 적성탐색검사. 서울: 한국가이던스.
안창규, 안현의 (2003). Holland 적성탐색검사. 서울: 한국가이던스.
탁진국 (1995). 한국 대학생을 대상으로 한 Holland 직업 흥미 모형의 구성타당도 검증, 광운대학교 대학 논문집, 24, 9-20.
한국고용정보원 (1998). 직업선호도검사.
한국고용정보원 (2008). 직업선호도검사(개정).
한국산업인력공단 (2003). 한국직업정보시스템(KNOW) 개발 보고서.
Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing(7th ed). Upper Saddle River. NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indics in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
Brown, D., & Brooks, L. (1996). Career Choice and Development. (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long(Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Farh, J. & Loeng, F. T. L. (1998). Cross-Cultural Validity of Holland's Model in Hong Kong. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52, 425-440.
Glidden-Tracey, C. E. & Parraga, M. I. (1996). Assessing the Sturcture of Vocational Interests among Bolivian University Students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 48, 96-106.
Harrington, T. F., & O'Shea, A. J. (1993). Harrington-O'Shea Career Decision Making System (Revised masual). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Hogan, R. (1999). John Holland's Vocational Typology and Personality Theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, 41-56.
Holland, J. L. (1973). Making vocational choices: A theory of careers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choice: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3nd ed.). Englewook Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Holland, J. L., Fritzsche, B. A., & Powell, A. B. (1994). SDS: Self-Directed Search Technical Manual. Odessa, FL.: PAR, Inc.
Holland, J. L., Powell, A. B. & Fritzsche, B. A. (1994). Self-Directed Search: Professional User's Guides. Odessa, FL.: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Holland. J. L. & Gottfredson, G. D. (1992). Studies of the hexagonal model: an evaluation(or The Perils of Stalking the perfect hexagon). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, 158-170.
Jones, L. K. (1987). The CareerKey. Chicago: J. G. Ferguson.
Jones, L. K. (1990). The Careerkey: An investigation of the reliability and validity of tis scales and its helpfulness to college students. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 23, 67-76.
Jones, L. K. (2000). Comparing the effects of the Careerkey with Self-Directed Search and JOB-OE among eighth-grade students. Professional School Counseling. 3, 238-247.
Jones, L. K., Gorman, S., & Schroeder, C. G. (1989). A comparison between the SDS and the Career Key among career undecided college students. Career Development Quarterly, 37, 334-344.
Kruskal, J. B., (1964). Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika, 29, 1-27.
Myors, B. (1998). A Monte Carlo Comparison of Three Tests of the Holland Hexagon. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 53, 215-226.
Prediger, D. J. (1982). Dimensions of underlying Holland's hexagon: Missing link between Interests and Occupations? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 21, 259-287.
Prediger, D. J., & Vansickle, T. R. (1992). Who claims Holland's Hexagon is perfect? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, 210-219.
Rounds, J., & Tracey, T. J. (1996). Cross-cultural structural equivalence of RIASEC models and measures. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 310-329.
Rounds, J., Tracey, T. J., & Hubert, L. (1992). Methods for evaluating vocational interest structural hypotheses. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, 239-259.
Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437-454.
Schneider, P. L. & Ryan, J. M., Tracey, J. J., & Rounds, J. (1996). Examining the relation between Holland's RIASEC model and the interpersonal circle. Measurement ans Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 29, 123-133.
Swanson, J. L. (1992). The Structure of interests for African-American College Students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, 144-157.
Tak, J. (2004). Structure of Vocational Interests for Korean College Students. Journal of Career Assessment, 12, 298-311.
Tracey, T. J. (1997). RANDALL: A Microsoft FORTRAN program for a randomization test of hypothesized order relations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 164-168.
Tracey, T. J., Watanabe, N., & Schneider, Pl L. (1997). Structural invariance of vocational interests across Japanese and American cultures. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44, 346-354.
Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrica, 38, 1-10.