바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

코칭리더십이 맥락수행 및 창의적 행동에 미치는 영향: 조직미덕과 학습목표지향성의 조절효과

The Effect of Coaching Leadership on Contextual Performance and Creative Behavior: The Moderating Effects of Organizational Virtuousness and Goal Orientation

초록

본 연구는 상사의 코칭리더십과 부하의 맥락수행, 창의적 행동의 관계성을 밝히는데 목적이 있다. 구체적으로 상사의 코칭리더십이 부하의 맥락수행과 창의적 행동에 미치는 영향력을 검증하고, 조직미덕, 학습목표지향성이 코칭리더십, 맥락수행, 창의적 행동의 관계에서 조절효과를 갖는지를 검증하였다. 본 연구를 위해 국내 기업에서 입사 3개월 이상인 직장인 250명 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. 그 중 불성실 응답과 연구에 적합하지 않은 데이터를 제외하고 220명의 데이터를 사용하여 분석하였다. 먼저 코칭리더십, 맥락수행, 그리고 조직미덕 각각에 대한 요인분석 결과 선행 연구와 동일한 하위요인으로 구분되었다. 코칭리더십과 맥락수행, 창의적 행동 간의 상관분석결과 정적인 관계가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 주 효과 및 조절검증을 위해 위계적 회귀분석을 실시한 결과, 리더의 코칭리더십이 부하의 맥락수행에 정적인 영향을 미치고 이 관계는 조직미덕에 의해 조절되는 것으로 나타났다. 리더의 코칭리더십은 구성원의 창의적 행동 간에도 정적인 영향을 미치지만 이 관계에서 개인의 학습목표지향성의 조절효과는 없는 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로 연구결과를 토대로 본 연구의 학문적 의의 및 실무적 시사점, 그리고 제한점과 추후 연구과제에 대하여 논의하였다.

keywords
Coaching leadership, Contextual performance, Creative behavior, Organizational virtuousness, Learning, goal orientation, 코칭리더십, 맥락수행, 창의적 행동, 조직미덕, 학습목표지향성

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships among coaching leadership, contextual performance and creative behavior. Specifically, This study investigated not only the main effect of leader’s coaching leadership on subordinate's contextual performance and creative behavior, but also the role of organizational virtuousness and learning goal orientation on moderating these relationships. Survey was conducted to 250 employees working for 3 months at various korean companies. After elimination of inadequate data, 220 data were obtained for statistical analysis. Three steps of analysis procedures were carried out. First, factor analyses were conducted for identifying dimensions of coaching leadership, contextual performance, and organizational virtuousness. The results showed that factor structures of each of the variables were identical to those of previous studies. Second, the results of correlation analyses showed that coaching leadership was positively related to both contextual performance and creative behavior. Third, the results of hierarchial regression analyses showed that while organizational virtuousness moderated the relationship between coaching leadership and contextual performance, learning goal orientation did not moderated the relationship between coaching leadership and creative behavior. The implications and limitations of this study and the directions for future research were discussed on the basis of the results.

keywords
Coaching leadership, Contextual performance, Creative behavior, Organizational virtuousness, Learning, goal orientation, 코칭리더십, 맥락수행, 창의적 행동, 조직미덕, 학습목표지향성

참고문헌

1.

김도영, 유태용 (2001). 기업 장면에서 맥락수행의 구성요인과 성격의 5요인과의 관계. 광운대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

2.

김정식, 서문교 (2008). 리더의 코칭행위가 조직구성원들의 인지적 유연성과 성과에 미치는 영향. 인적자원관리연구, 15(3), 31-48.

3.

박영석, 성미송 (2003). 접근-회피 성취 목표의 타당도 연구. 사회과학연구, 19, 51-64.

4.

배고은 (1999). 심리적인 임파워먼트가 창의적 행동에 미치는 매개효과 연구. 이화여자대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

5.

이재준 (2008). 지각된 조직상황이 조직구성원의 창의적 행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 한양대학교 경영학과 석사학위논문.

6.

유근홍 (2007). 코칭리더십 프로그램 개발. 국방대학교 석사학위논문.

7.

서원경 (2008). 학습목표지향성과 조직의 지지가 인터넷 교육의 학습만족도와 전이동기에 미치는 영향에 있어서 학습동기의 매개효과. 충남대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

8.

조은현, 탁진국(2011). 코칭리더십 척도 개발 및 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 24, 127-155.

9.

Amabile, T. M. (1983). The Social psychology of creativity, Springer-Verlag, New york. NY,. Manual request.

10.

Amabile, T. M. (1987). Motivating creativity in orgaizations. Califirnia Mamagement Review, 40(1).

11.

Armenio, R., Neuza, R., & Miguel P. C. (2010). Perceptions of Organizational Virtuousness and Happiness as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. Journal of Business ethics, 93, 215-235.

12.

Arnord, J. J., Arad, S., Rhoades, J. A., & Drasgow, F. (2000). The Empowering Leadership Questionnaire: The construction and Validation of a new Scale for measuring leader behaviors, Journal of Organizational behavior, 21(3): 249-269.

13.

Basadur, M., Wakabayashi, M., & Graen, G. B. (1990). Individual Problem-solving Styles and Attitudes toward Divergent thinking before and after Training, Journal of Applied Psychology, 1, 22-32.

14.

Bass. B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Developing Transformational leadership: 1992 and beyond. Journal of European Industrial Training, 14, 21-27.

15.

Baker,T. L., T. G. Hunt & M. C. Andrews. (2006). Promoting Ethical Behavior and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: The Influence of Corporate Ethical Values, Journal of Business Research. 59, 849-857.

16.

Baumeister, R. F. & Exline, J. J. (1999). Virtue, Personality, and social relations: Self-control as the moral muscle. journal of Personality, 67: 1165-1194.

17.

Baumeister, R. F., & Exline, J. J. (2000). Self-control, morality, and human strength. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 29-42.

18.

Brief, A. P., & Motoiwidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review. 10, 710-725.

19.

Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993) Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Personnel selection in organizations. 71, 98.

20.

Button, S. B., Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1996). Goal orientation in organizational research: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 67, 26-48.

21.

Cameron, K. S. (2003). OV and Performance, in K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton and R. E. Quinn (eds.), Positive Organizational Scholarship (Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco), pp.48-65.

22.

Cameron, K. S., D. Bright & A. Caza. (2004). Exploring the Relationships Between OV and Performance, American Behavioral Scientist. 47(6), 766-790.

23.

Dent, N. (1984). The moral psychology of the virtues. New York: Cambridge University Press.

24.

Doherty. W. J. (1995). Soul searching: Why psychotherapy must promote moral responsibility. New York: Basic Books.

25.

Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist. 41, 1040-1048.

26.

Dweck, C. S. (1989). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadephia: Psychology Press.

27.

Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review. 95, 256-273.

28.

Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C, & Hong, Y. (1995a). Implicit theories and their role in judgment and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry. 6(4), 267-285.

29.

Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C, & Hong, Y. (1995b). Implicit theories: Elaboration and extension of the model. Psychological Inquiry. 6(4), 322-333.

30.

Eisenberg, E. M. (1990). Jamming: Transcendence through organizing. Communication Research. 17: 139-164.

31.

Emmons, R. A. (1999). The psychology of ultimate concerns: Motivation and spirituality in personality. New York: Guilford Press.

32.

Ettlie, E., & O’keefe, R. D. (1982). Innovative Attitude, Values, and Intentions in Organizations, Journal of Management Studies. 2, 163-182.

33.

Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2005). A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review. 30(2), 269-287.

34.

Hatch, M. J. (1999). Exploring the empty spaces of organizing: How improvisational jazz helps redescribe organizational structure. Organizational Studies. 20: 75-100.

35.

Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis if organizational behavior. Behavioral Science. 9, 131-146.

36.

Katz, H., Kochan, T., & Weber, M. (1985). Assessing the effects of industial relation systems and efforts and efforts to improve the quality of working life on organizational effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal. 28, 509-526.

37.

Kohli, A. K., Shervani, T. A., & Challagalla, N. G. (1998). Learning and performance orientation of salespeople: The role of supervisors. Journal of Marking Research. Vol. 35, pp.263-274.

38.

Leavitt, H. J. (1996). The old days, hot groups, and managers lib. Adminstrative Science Quarterly. 41:288-300.

39.

McCullough, M. E. & Snyder, C. R. (2001). Classical sources of human strength: Revisiting an old home and building a new one. journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19: 1-10.

40.

Oldham, G. R. & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal. 39, 607- 634.

41.

Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance. 10, 85-98.

42.

Payne, S. C., Youngcourt, S. S., & Beaubien, J. M. (2007). A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net. Journal of Applied Psychology. 92(1), 128-150.

43.

Peterson, C. M., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2000). The classification of strengths and virtues: The VIA manual. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pennsylvania.

44.

Peterson, C. (2003). Classification of positive traits in youth. In R. M. Lerner, F. Jacobs, & D. Wertlieb (Eds.), Promoting positive child, adolescent, and family development 4, 227-255.

45.

Pintrich P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology. 92(3), 544-555.

46.

Phillips, R.(1994). Coaching for higher Performance, Managerment development Review, 7(5): 19-22.

47.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, Moorman, & Fetter (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly. 1, 107-147.

48.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). The impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestions for future research. Human Performance. 10, 133-151.

49.

Quinn, R. W., & Dutton, J. E. (2002). Coordination as energy-in-conversation: Aprocess theory of organizing. Working paper, University of michigan Business School.

50.

Redshaw, B.(2000). Do we really understand coaching? How can we make it work better? Industrial and Commercial Training. 32(3): 106- 108.

51.

Roberts, R. C. (1988). Therapies and the grammar of virtue. In R. H. Bell, (Ed.), The grammar of the heart: New essays in moral philosophy and theology. 149-170.

52.

Ryff, C. D. & Singer, B. (1998). The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 1-28.

53.

Scott, S. G. & Bruce, R. A.(1994). Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace, Academy of Management Journal, 37, 599.

54.

Sethi, R., & Nicholson, C. Y. (2001). Structural and contextual correlates of charged behavior in product development teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 18: 154-168.

55.

Siegel, S. M., & Kaemmerer, W. F. (1978). Measuring the Perceived Supports for Innovation in Organizations, Journal of Applied Psychology. 63, 553-562.

56.

Shalley, C. E. (1995). Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity. Academy of Management Journal. 38, 483-503.

57.

Srivastava, A., Bartoal, K. M. & Loke, E. A. (2006). Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on Knowledge sharing, efficacy and performance, Academy of Management Journal. 49(6): 1239-1251.

58.

Sternberg. R. J & Lubart. T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychology. July. 677- 688.

59.

VandeWalle, D., Brown, S. P., Cron, W. L., & Slocum, jr., W. J. (1999). The influence of goal orientaation and self-regulation tactics on sales performance: A longitudinal field test. Journal of Applied Psychology. 84(2), 249-259.

60.

VandeWalle, D., Cron, W. L., & Slocum, jr., W. J. (2001). The role of goal orientation following performance feedback Journal of Applied Psychology. 86(4), 629-640.

61.

Whitmore, J. (2002). Coaching for Performance: GROWing People, Performance, and Purpose. (3rd eds.). 김영순 옮김. 성과향상을 위한 코칭 리더십. 경기: 김영사.

logo