open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 1229-0696
The purpose of this study was to explore interation effects of leadership styles and team type on team effectiveness. 216 experimental participants were assigned to each experimental conditions according to 2 (type of team: face to face team vs. virtual team) × 3(leadership styles: transformational leadership vs. transactional leadership vs. laissez-faire leadership) factorial experimental design. As 7 participants were excepted because of incredible behaviors during experiment, finally data obtained from 209 participants were statistically analysed. 6 confederates played role as one leader's style according the script described leader's behavior in face to face team or virtual team. The results of 2-way ANOVA, the interaction effect of team type and leadership styles on the team effectiveness was statistically significant. Level of task effectiveness and team satisfaction of transformational leadership in virtual team were higher than other conditions. Thus, These results implied that transformational leadership will be superior than other leadership styles among various type virtual work teams in 21th century as a knowledge based society. The meaning of this study was to use the laboratory experimental design for examining differential effects of leadership styles in the face to face team and virtual team. Finally limitations of this study and tasks for future study were discussed.
김정남 (2009). 한국어 MLQ Form 5-45의 요인구조 모형 비교. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 22(4), 567-569.
김호정 (2001). 변혁적ㆍ거래적 리더십이 조직몰입에 미치는 영향. 韓國行政學報, 35(2), 197-216.
박영석, 조용주 (1999). 거래적 리더십과 변혁적 리더십이 부하의 작업동기에 미치는 효과. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 12 (2), 1-21.
신유형, 임형록 (2010). 대면 집단과 컴퓨터 매체 집단에서의 정서의 역할 비교: 집단 프로세스와 성과를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 23(3), 419-442.
정무관 (2009). 팀구성원이 지각하는 상사의 감성지능과 상사신뢰가 팀유효성에 미치는 영향. 大韓經營學會誌, 22(5), 2895- 2918.
탁진국, 장종순 (2003). 거래적 및 변혁적 리더십의 효과: 일선 소대장을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 16(2), 47-60.
한국정보화진흥원 (2010). TRN, 원격근무가 미국 경제에 미치는 영향 발표. 녹색정보화 뉴스레터.
Armstrong, D. J., & Cole, P. (2002). Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work group. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler(Eds.), Distributed work (pp.167-186). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Aktouf, O. (1992). Management and theories of organizations in the 1990s: Toward a critical radical humanism? Academy of Management Review, 17, 407-431.
Avolio, B. J., Kahai, S., & Dodge, G. E. (2001). E-leadership: implications for theory, research, and practice. Leadership Quarterly, 11, 615-668.
Avolio, B. J., Kahai, S., Dumdum, R., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (2001). Virtual teams: Implications for e-leadership and team development. In M London(Ed.), How People Evaluate Other in Organizations (pp.337-358). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. NY: Free Press.
Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J. (1995). The Multifactor LeadershipQuestionnaire (Form 5-45). PaloAlto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
Berry, G. R. (2011). Enhancing effectiveness on virtual teams: Understanding why traditional team skills are insufficient. Journal of Business Communication, 48, 186-206.
Bock, G., Ng, W., & Shin, Y. (2008). The effect of a perceived leader's influence on the motivation of the members of nonwork-related virtual communicaties, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(May).
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. NY: Harper & Row.
Cappel, J. J., & Windsor, J. C. (2000). Ethical decision making: A comparison of computer- supported and face-to-face group. Journal of Business Ethics, 28, 95-107.
Casio, W. F., & Shurygailo, S. (2003). E- leadership and virtual team. Organizational Dynamins, 31, 362-376.
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290.
Daly, B. L. (1993). The influence of face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication channels on collective induction. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 3, 1- 22.
Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (1999). Research note. electronic brainstorming: Illusions and patterns of productivity. Information Systems Research, 10, 375-377.
Drickell, J. E., Radtke, P. H., & Salas, E. (2003). Virtual teams: effects of technology mediation on team performance. Group Dynamics: Thory, Research, and Practice, 4, 297-323.
Eaton, A., & Voos, P. (1994). Productivity- enhancing innovations in work organization, compensation, and employee participation in the union versus the nonunion sectors. Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations, 6, 63-109.
Graetz, K. A., Boyle, E. S., Kimble, C. E., Thompson, P., & Garloch, J. L. (1998). Information sharing in face-to-face, teleconferencing, and electronic chat groups. Small Group Research, 29, 714-743.
Griffith, T. L., & Neale. M. A. (2001). Information processing in traditional, hybrid, and virtual teams: From nascent knowledge to transactive memory. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 379-421.
Hambley, L. A., O'Neill, T. A., & Kline, T. B. (2007). Virtual team leadership: The effects of leadership style and communication medium on team interaction styles and outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 1-20.
Hinds, P. J., & Weisband, S. P. (2003). Knowledge sharing and shared understanding in virtual teams. In C. B. Gibson & S. G. Cohen. Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness (pp.21-36). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Hollingshead, A. B. (1996). Information suppression and status persistence in group decision making the effects of communication media. Human Communication Research, 23, 193-219.
Hollingshead, A. B. (2004). Communication technologies, the internet, and group research. In M. B. Brewer & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Applied Social Psychology (pp.301-317). MA: Blackwell Publishing
Jessup, L. M., & Tansik, D. A. (1991). Decision making in an automated environment: The effects of anonymity and proximity with a group decision support system. Decision Sciences, 22, 266-279.
Kahai, S. S., Sosik, J. J., & Avolio, B. J. (1997). Effects of leadership style and problem structure on work group process and outcomes in an electronic meeting system environment. Personnel Psychology, 50(1), 121-146.
Kahai, S. S., Sosik, J. J., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Effects of leadership style, anonymity, and rewards on creativity-relevant processes and outcomes in an electronic meeting system context. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 499-524.
Kahai, S. S., Sosik, J. J., & Avolio, B. J. (2004). Effects of participative and directive leadership in electronic groups. Group and Organization Management, 29, 67-105.
Kanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y. (2002). Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11, 187-213.
Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K., (2001). The Discipline of Teams: A Mindbook-Workbook for Delivering Small Group Performance. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Kayworth, T. R., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 7-40.
Levi, D. (2010). Group dynamics for teams. Sage Publications, Inc.
Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K. G., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the mlq literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 385-425.
Mann, S., & Holdsworth, L. (2003). The psychological impact of teleworking: Stress, emotions and health. New Technology, Work and Employment, 18, 196-211.
Mannix, E. A., Griffith, T., & Neale, M. A. (2002). The phenomenology of conflict in distributed work teams. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Patel, V. L., Kaufman, D. R., Allen, V. G., Shortliffe, E. H., Cimino, J. J., & Greenes, R. A. (1999). Toward a framework for computer- mediated collaborative design in medical informatics. Methods of Information in Medicine, 38, 158-176.
Purvanova, R. K., & Bono, J. E. (2009). Transformational leadership in context: Face- to-face and virtual teams. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 343-357.
Ruggieri, S. (2009). Leadership in virtual teams: A comparison of transformational and transactional leaders. Social behavior and personality, 37, 1017-1022.
Sosik, J. J., Avolio, B. J., & Kahai, S. S. (1997). Effects of leadership style and anonymity on group potency and effectiveness in a group decision support system environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 89-103.
Sosik, J. J., Avolio, B. J., Kahai, S. S., & Jung, D. I. (1998). Computer-supported work group potency and effectiveness: The role of transformational leadership, anonymity, and task interdependence. Computers in Human Behavior, 14, 491-511.
Straus, S. G. (1996). Getting a clue: The effects of communication media and information distribution on participation and performance in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Research, 27, 115-142.
Sundstrom, E., DeMeuse, K. P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120.
Thompson, L. F., & Coovert, M. D. (2002). Stepping up to the challenge: A critical examination of face-to-face and computer- mediated team decision making. Group Dynamics, 6, 52-64.
Thompson, L. F., & Coovert, M. D. (2003). Teamwork online: The effects of computer conferencing on perceived confusion, satisfaction, and postdiscussin accuracy. Group Dynamics, 7, 135-151.
Townsend, A. M., DeMarie, S. M., & Hendrickson, A. R. (1998). Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future. Academy of Management Executive, 12, 17-29.
Vroman, K., & Kovacich, J. (2002). Computer- mediated interdisciplinary teams: Theory and reality. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 16, 159- 170.
Wang, L., & Xi, Y. (2007). Trust as a mediator of the effects of transformational leadership on performance in virtual teams. 2007 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, WiCOM 2007, 6045-6048.
Wakertin, M. E., Sayeed, L., & Hightower, R. (1997). Virtual teams versus face-to-face teams: an exploratory study of a web-based conference system. Decision Sciences, 28, 975-996
Walther, J. B. (1995). Related aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experiential observations. Organizational Science, 6, 180-203.
Weisband, S. P. (1992). Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53, 352-380.
Weisband, S. P. (2002). Maintaining awareness in distributed team collaboration: Implications for leadership and performance, In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work, 311-333. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.