바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

A Study of Glass Ceiling Effect on Impression Management Behaviors between Korean and U.S. Women Managers in Financial Institutions -focused on Supervisor support and Informal Network-

Abstract

This study examines contextual factors regarding glass ceiling effects women’s impression management behaviors arguing that impression management is not always caused by personal traits, but more importantly by context. This study explores to develop a cross-cultural examination to investigate glass ceiling effects over impression management behaviors of Korean and American female managers and organizational factors as moderating variables. Impression management is the process whereby individuals control their impressions in seeking to influence the perception of others about their own image (Rosenfeld, Giacalone, & Riordan, 1995). In the literature on impression management, gender difference in adopting impression management strategies are often considered (Singh, Kumra, & Vinnicombe, 2002; Thacker & Wayne, 1995). Although those studies contributed to further studies on impression management, this study focuses on women managers who try to control their impression. Leary & Kowalski(1990) argued that impression management may be a reaction to the discrepancy between desired social image and actual one. This implies that when people recognize a threat to their social identity, they are more likely to engage in impression management. Women employees may be inclined to engage in impression management behaviors for the following reason: they are structurally positioned as minorities even though recently women have advanced in terms of the number of women and the proportion of higher positions attained(Burt, 1997; Ibarra, 1992), and they may be more likely to experience the ‘glass ceiling’ within their organization (Dencker, 2008; Kirchmeyer, 2002; Thacker, 1995). In this sense, when women managers perceive glass ceilings within their organizations, it can affect the women’s impression management behaviors(Greenhaus, et al., 1990; Wayne, et al. 1999; Kirchmeyer, 2002). Second, this study examines organizational related factors which can moderate the above relationship. Supervisory supports and organizational informal networks within organization provide women employees with a sense of psychological satisfaction not only in terms of the practical support for careers but personal relationships and work in general (Forret & Dougherty, 2001). Thus, it would be a straightforward reasoning that women employees with supervisor supports & organizational informal network support would decrease the motivation of impression management behaviors. For data collection, this study surveyed women employees who have worked for at least 5 years in financial institutions. In Korea, questionnaires were administered to deputy managers and those at higher levels of 22 financial institutions and a total of 148 were used. In the United States, a random sample was selected because researchers were limited in accessing companies. Many financial institutions were visited, questionnaires were administered to managers with subordinates in state of California and New York, total 128 were used for research. The analysis of the study shows that the more perceived glass ceiling of women managers in organizations are likely to show supervisor-focused impression management behaviors. Second, supervisor supports have significant moderating impact on the supervisor-focused impression management. Third, organization informal networks have significant moderating impact on job-focused impression management in both Korea & U.S women managers.

keywords
한미 여성 관리자, 유리천장 인식, 상사중심 인상관리, 직무중심 인상관리, 상사지원 인식, 조직 내 비공식 네트워크, Glass Ceiling, Supervisor-focused Impression, Job-focused Impression, Supervisor Support, Organizational Informal Network, Korea & US Women Managers, Glass Ceiling, Supervisor-focused Impression, Job-focused Impression, Supervisor Support, Organizational Informal Network, Korea & US Women Managers

Reference

1.

이주희 (2001). 유리천장 깨기?: 성공적인 관리직 여성인력정책의 조건, 인사조직학회 발표논문집.

2.

장 영 (2004). 유리천장(Glass Ceiling) 인식의 영향요인: 여성근로자들에 대한 탐색적 연구, 상업교육연구, 7, 361-391.

3.

배병렬 (2009). AMOS 17.0 구조방정식모델 모델링-원리와 실제, 도서출판 청람

4.

홍세희 (2008). 구조방정식 모형: 초급, 중급 홍세희 교수의 고급연구 방법론 워크샵 시리즈 4, S&M 리서치 그룹 아시아경제, 2010

5.

한국경제, 여성가족부 공동보고서, 2009.

6.

고용노동부 (2010). 매출 100대 기업 직급별 남녀고용현황.

7.

Auster, E. R. (1993). Demystifying the Glass Ceiling: Organizational and Interpersonal Dynamics of Gender Bias. Business and the Contemporary World, 5, 47-68.

8.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173- 1182.

9.

Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treat is in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Doubleday.

10.

Blumberg, M., & Pringle, C. (1982). The Missing Opportunity in Organizational Research: Some Implications for a Theory of Work Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 327-343.

11.

Burt, R. S. (1997). The Contingent Value of Social Capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 339-365.

12.

Capozza, D. & R. Brown(2000), Social Identity Processes, London: Sage.

13.

Collins, N. (1983). Professional Women and Their Mentors: A Practical Guide to Mentoring for the Woman Who Wants to Get Ahead. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

14.

D’Andrade, R. (1995). The Development of Cognitive Anthropology. Cambridge, UK: The Cambridge University Press.

15.

Dencker, J. C. (2008). Corporate Restructuring and Sex Differences in Managerial Promotion. American Sociological Review, 73, 455-476.

16.

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.

17.

Dobbins, G., Long, W. S., Dedrick, E. J., & Clemons, T. C. (1990). The Role of Self- Monitoring and Gender on Leader Emergence: A Laboratory and Field Study. Journal of Management, 16(3), 609-618.

18.

Dreher, G. F. & Bretz. R. D (1991). Cognitive Ability and Career Attainment: Moderating Effects of Early Career Success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(3), 392-397.

19.

Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

20.

Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233-256.

21.

Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1986). Gender and Aggressive Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Social Psychological Literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 309-330.

22.

Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1991). Explaining Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Meta- Analytic Perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 306-315.

23.

Everett, L., D. M. Thorne, and C. Danehower (1992). Attitude toward Women Executives: A Multifirm Study. Paper presented at the Southern Management Association in New Orleans, LA.

24.

Ferris, G. R., Perrewe, P. L., Anthony, W. P., & Gilmore, D. C. (2001). Political Skills at Work. Organizational Dynamics, 28(4), 25-37.

25.

Forret, M. L., & Dougherty, T. W. (2001). Correlates of Networking Behavior for Managerial and Professional Employees. Group & Organization Management, 26(3), 283-311.

26.

Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, New York: Doubleday Anchor.

27.

Goodman, J. S., Fields, D. L., & Blum, T. C. (2003). Cracks in the Glass Ceiling. Group & Organization Management, 28, 475-501.

28.

Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W. M. (1990). Effects of Race on Organizational Experiences, Job Performance Evaluations, and Career Outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 64-86.

29.

Guadagno, R. E., & Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Gender Differences in Impression Management in Organizations. A Qualitative Review, 56, 483- 494.

30.

Hofstede, G. (1991). Culture and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGrawHill.

31.

Ibarra, H. (2000). Making Partner, A Metaphor’s Guide to the Psychological Journey,” Harvard Business Review(March-April), 146-155.

32.

Ibarra, H. (1993). Personal Networks of Women and Minorities in Management: A Conceptual Framework. The Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 56-87.

33.

Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and Differential Returns: Sex Differences in Network Structure an Access in an Advertising Firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3), 422-447.

34.

Jawahar, I. M., & Hemmasi, P. (2006). Perceived Organizational Support for Women’s Advancement and Turnover Intentions: The Mediating Role of Job and Employer Satisfaction. Woman in Management Review, 21(8), 643-661.

35.

Johnson, C. D. (2001). In Search of Traditional and Contemporary Career Success. Phd Dissertation, University of Georgia.

36.

Jones, E. E. (1965). Ingratiation: A Social- Psychological Analysis. New York: Appleton- Century-Crofts.

37.

Jones, E. E., and Pittman, T. S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological Perspectives on the Self, 231-262, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

38.

Judge, T. A., Cable, D. M., Boudrea, J. W., & Bretz, R. D. (1995). An Empirical Investigation of the Predictors of Executives Career Success. Personal Psychology, 48, 485- 519.

39.

Kepahart, P., & Schumacher, L. (2005). Has the Glass Ceiling Cracked?: An Exploration of Women Entrepreneurship. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 12, 1-15.

40.

Kilduff, M., & Day, D. V. (1994). Do Chameleons Get Ahead?: The Effects of Self-monitoring on Managerial Careers. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1047-1060.

41.

Kirchmeyer, C. (2002). Gender Differences in Managerial Careers: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. Journal of Business Ethics, 37, 5-24.

42.

Klenke, K. (1996). Women and Leadership: A Contextual Perspective. New York: Springer.

43.

Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression Management: A Literature Review and Two-Component Model. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 34-47.

44.

Lee, S-E. (2005). A Research on the Interrelationship between Organizational Culture and Women’s Social Network in Korea. Korean Women’s Studies, 21(1), 125-164.

45.

London, M. (1993). Relationships between Career Motivation, Empowerment, and Support for Career Development. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66, 55-69.

46.

Michael, J., & Yukl, G. (1993). Managerial Level and Sub-unit Function as Determinants of Networking Behavior in Organizations. Group & Organization Management, 18, 328-351.

47.

Morrison, A., & Von Gilnow, M. A. (1990). Women and Minorities in Management. American Psychologist, 45, 200-208.

48.

Morrison, A. M., White, R. P., & Van Velsor, E. (1987). Breaking the Glass Ceiling, Can Women Reach the Top of America's Largest Corporations? MA: Addison-Wesley.

49.

Oakley, J. G. (2000). Gender-based Barriers to Senior Management Positions: Understanding the Scarcity of Female CEOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 321-334.

50.

Piaget, J. The Language and thought of the Child. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1926.

51.

Ping, R. A. (1996). Latent variable interaction and quadratic effect estimation: A two-step technique using structural equation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 166-175.

52.

Rosenfeld, P., Giacalone, R. A., & Riordan, C. A. (1995). Impression Management in Organizations: Theory, Measurement, Practice. London: Routledge.

53.

Rudman, L. (1998). Self-Promotion as a Risk Factor for Women: The Costs and Benefits of Counter-Stereotypical Impression Management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 629-645.

54.

Schein, V. E., Mueller, R., Lituchy, T., & Liu, J. (1996). Think Manager, Think Male: A Global Phenomenon. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17(1), 33-41.

55.

Singh, V., Kumra, S., & Vinnicombe, S. (2002). Gender and Impression Management: Playing the Promotion Game. Journal of Business Ethics, 37, 77-89.

56.

Strauss, C. & Quinn, N. (1997). A Cognitive Theory of Cultural Meaning. UK: Cambridge University Press.

57.

Thacker, R. A. (1995). Gender, Influence Tactics, and Job Characteristics Preferences: New Insights into Salary Determination. Sex Roles, 32, 617-638.

58.

Thacker, R. A., & Wayne, S. J. (1995). An Examination of the Relationship between Upward Influence Tactics and Assessments of Promotability. Journal of Management, 21(4), 739-756.

59.

Tharenou, P., Latimer, S., & Conroy, D. (1994). How do You Make it to the Top? An Examination of Influences on Women's and Men's Managerial Advancement. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 899-931.

60.

Van Vianen, A. E. M. and A. H. Fischer (2002). Illuminating the Glass Ceiling: The Role of Organizational Culture Preferences. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 315-337.

61.

Vinnicomb, S., Singh, V., & Sturges, J. (2000). Making it to the Top in Britain. In R. J. Burke, & M. Mattis (Eds.), Women on Corporate Boards of Directors. International Challenges and Opportunities, 57-74.

62.

Wayne, S. J., & Ferris, G. R. (1990). Influence Tactics, Affect and Exchange Quality in Supervisor-Subordinate Interactions: A Laboratory Experiment and Field Study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 487-499.

63.

Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., Kraimer, M. L., & Graf, I. K. (1999). The Role of Human Capital, Motivation and Supervisor Sponsorship in Predicting Career Success. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 577-595.

64.

Wrigley, B. J. (2002). Glass Ceiling? What Glass Ceiling? A Qualitative Study of How Women View the Glass Ceiling in Public Relations and Communications Management, Journal of Public Relations Research, 14(1), 27-55.

65.

Yang, J. F. (1997). Nonlinear structural equation models: Simulation Studies of the Kenny-Judd Model. Ph D. thesis, Department of Statistics, Uppsala University.

logo