ISSN : 1229-0696
The purpose of this study is to systematically analyze the content of articles published in Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology(KJIOP) which celebrated its 30th anniversary in 2018. In this current study, we analyzed 625 out of 627 articles published in 85 volumes over the past 30 years since its first issue in 1988. These articles were analyzed according to analysis items and classification criteria: the demographic characteristics of authors, research topics, research settings, research methods, types of participants, and types and frequency of statistical analysis. It was found that most of authors, 1,027(83.9%) out of 1,401, belong to psychology and the I/O psychology department, and 1,265(90.3%) researchers were from universities. Also, the number of female researchers, 15 in the first 10 years, had gradually increased to 109(23.2%) in the mid-term and increased to 293(36.0%) in the recent 10 years. In regards to the topic of the articles, 376(60.2%) were related to organizational psychology, which is one of the sub-categories in I/O psychology. The results from the analysis of research settings show that the majority of studies were conducted in the industrial setting. In the research method, survey by questionnaire was the most common method with 74.1%(463). Most of the studies(66.4%) obtained data from job incumbents in industrial settings. Similar to the first 10 years, factor analysis, correlational analysis, and regression analysis were most frequently used over 30 years and the types of statistical analysis have become more diverse. Furthermore, the use of on-line questionnaires in research have been expanded in the recent 10 years. As research topics had been sophisticated, new methods of analysis such as multi-level analysis, survival analysis, and non-linear analysis were actively used. Finally, research results published over the past 30 years were summarized according to their research topics. Based on the content analysis, the direction of the future KJIOP and additional research topics were discussed.
유태용, 탁진국 (1998). 창간 10주년을 맞는 ‘한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직’의 ‘내용분석 및 앞으로의 제언’. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 11(1), 53-76.
차재호 (1976). 한국심리학의 역사, 현황 및 사회과학 협동연구의 방향. 사회과학논문집, 1, 61-100.
한국심리학회 (1996). 한국심리학회 50년사. 교육과학사.
Aguinis, H., Ambrose, M. L., Cascio, W. F., Cropanzano, R. S., Mathieu, J. E., & Sanchez, J. I. (2003). I-O psychologists in business schools. Panel discussion presented at the 18th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.
Aguinis, H., Joo, H., & Gottfredson, R. K. (2011). Why we hate performance management-And why we should love it. Business Horizons, 54(6), 503-507.
Aguinis, H., Ramani, R. S., Campbell, P. K., Bernal-Turnes, P., Drewry, J. M., & Edgerton, B. T. (2017). Most frequently cited sources, articles, and authors in industrial-organizational psychology textbooks: Implications for the science-practice divide, scholarly impact, and the future of the field. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 10(4), 507-557.
Aguinis, H., Bradley, K. J., & Brodersen, A. (2014). Industrial-organizational psychologists in business schools: Brain drain or eye opener?. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7(3), 284-303.
Bartlett, D., & Francis-Smythe, J. (2016). Bridging the divide in work and organizational psychology: Evidence from practice. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(5), 615-630.
Bliese, P. D., Edwards, J. R., & Sonnentag, S. (2017). Stress and well-being at work: A century of empirical trends reflecting theoretical and societal influences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 389-402.
Blum, M. L., & Naylor, J. C. (1968). Industrial psychology: Its theoretical and social foundations. Harper & Row.
Brown, T. C., O’Kane, P., Mazumdar, B., & McCracken, M. (2019). Performance management: A scoping review of the literature and an agenda for future research. Human Resource Development Review, 18(1), 47-82.
Cascio, W. F., & Aguinis, H. (2008). Research in industrial and organizational psychology from 1963 to 2007: Changes, choices, and trends. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1062-1081.
Cascio, W. F., & Montealegre, R. (2016). How technology is changing work and organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 349-375.
Coovert, M. D., & Thompson, L. F. (2014). The psychology of workplace technology. New York, NY: Routledge/Psychology Press.
DeNisi, A. S., & Murphy, K. R. (2017). Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress?. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 421-433.
Gilliland, S. W., & Cortina, J. M. (1997). Reviewer and editor decision making in the journal review process. Personnel Psychology, 50(2), 427-452.
Goler, L., Gale, J., & Grant, A. (2016). Let’s not kill performance evaluation yet. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2016/11/lets-not-kill-performance-evaluations-yet
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513-524.
Hulin, C. L. (2014). Work and being: The meanings of work in contemporary society. In J. K. Ford, J. R. Hollenbeck, & A. M. Ryan (Eds.), The nature of work: Advances in psychological theory, methods, and practice (pp. 9-33). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
Lopes De Leao Laguna, L., Poell, R., & Meerman, M. (2019). Practitioner research for the professionalization of human resources practice: Empirical data from the Netherlands. Human Resource Development International, 22(1), 68-90.
McCormick, E. J., & Tiffin, J. (1974). Industrial psychology(6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
McFarland, L. A., & Ployhart, R. E. (2015). Social media: A contextual framework to guide research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(6), 1653-1677.
Montealegre, R., & Cascio, W. F. (2017). Technology-driven changes in work and employment. Communications of the ACM, 60(12), 60-67.
Muchinsky, P. M. (1997). Psychology applied to work(5th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Rock, D., & Jones, B. (2015). Why more and more companies are ditching performance ratings. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2015/09/whymore-and-more-companies-are-ditching-performance-ratings
Rupp, D. E., & Beal, D. (2007). Checking in with the scientist-practitioner model: How are we doing?. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 45(1), 35-40.
Salas, E., Kozlowski, S. W., & Chen, G. (2017). A century of progress in industrial and organizational psychology: Discoveries and the next century. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 589-598.
Schein, E. H. (1978). Career dynamics: Matching individual and organizational needs. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Schein, E. H. (2015). Organizational psychology then and now: Some observations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 1-19.
Schultz, D. P. (1982). Psychology and industry today: An introduction to industrial and organizational psychology(3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Walker, H. J., Feild, H. S., Bernerth, J. B., & Becton, J. B. (2012). Diversity cues on recruitment websites: Investigating the effects on job seekers' information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 214-224.
Walker, J. H., Feild, H. S., Giles, W. F., Armenakis, A. A., & Bernerth, J. B. (2009). Displaying Employee Testimonials on Recruitment Web Sites: Effects of Communication Media, Employee Race, and Job Seeker Race on Organizational Attraction and Information Credibility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1354-1364.
World Bank. (2019). World Development Report 2019: The changing nature of work. Washington, DC: World Bank.