바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

논문 상세

창간 30주년 ‘한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직’ 내용분석 및 제언

The content analysis of the Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology from 1988 to 2018 and future suggestions

초록

본 연구는 2018년에 창간 30주년이 된 ‘한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직’에 게재된 논문들의 내용을 체계적으로 분석하였다. 1988년 창간호부터 2018년까지 30년 동안 총 85권의 학회지에 게재된 627편의 논문 중 625편을 대상으로 논문저자 특성, 연구주제, 연구장면, 연구방법, 연구참가자 유형, 논문에 사용된 통계분석 등을 기준으로 분류하고 내용을 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 저자 소속은 심리학과 및 산업심리학과가 전체 저자 수인 1,401명 중 1,027명(83.9%)으로 가장 많았고, 대학에 속한 저자가 1,265명(90.3%)으로 가장 많았다. 또한 초기 10년에는 15명에 불과했던 여성 저자의 비율이 최근 10년 들어 293명(36.0%)으로 늘어난 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 연구 주제별로 논문을 분류한 결과, 조직심리 논문이 376편(60.2%)으로 가장 많았고, 연구가 수행된 물리적 장소를 분석한 결과, 실제 현장에서 이루어진 연구가 471편(75.4%)으로 가장 많았다. 연구방법은 설문지에 의한 조사연구가 전체의 74.1%(463편)로 가장 많았으며, 실제 산업 현장의 현직자 집단을 대상으로 수행한 연구가 전체의 66.4%(415편)로 가장 많았다. 그 외에도 최근 10년 전부터 온라인 설문지를 활용한 조사연구가 확대되고 있으며, 통계분석은 초기 10년과 유사하게 요인분석, 상관분석, 회귀분석이 가장 널리 활용되었다. 최근 10년 들어 통계분석 종류는 더욱 다양해졌는데 다수준분석, 생존분석, 비선형분석 등 새로운 분석기법을 적극 활용하기 시작하였다. 끝으로 지난 30년 동안 게재된 논문을 주제별로 개관하였으며, 이러한 내용분석을 토대로 앞으로 ‘한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직’이 추구해야 할 지향점과 부가적인 과제에 대해 논의하였다.

keywords
내용분석, 산업 및 조직심리학, 학문의 정체성, 주제별 개관, 향후과제, content analysis, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, academic identity, overview of research topic, future suggestion

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to systematically analyze the content of articles published in Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology(KJIOP) which celebrated its 30th anniversary in 2018. In this current study, we analyzed 625 out of 627 articles published in 85 volumes over the past 30 years since its first issue in 1988. These articles were analyzed according to analysis items and classification criteria: the demographic characteristics of authors, research topics, research settings, research methods, types of participants, and types and frequency of statistical analysis. It was found that most of authors, 1,027(83.9%) out of 1,401, belong to psychology and the I/O psychology department, and 1,265(90.3%) researchers were from universities. Also, the number of female researchers, 15 in the first 10 years, had gradually increased to 109(23.2%) in the mid-term and increased to 293(36.0%) in the recent 10 years. In regards to the topic of the articles, 376(60.2%) were related to organizational psychology, which is one of the sub-categories in I/O psychology. The results from the analysis of research settings show that the majority of studies were conducted in the industrial setting. In the research method, survey by questionnaire was the most common method with 74.1%(463). Most of the studies(66.4%) obtained data from job incumbents in industrial settings. Similar to the first 10 years, factor analysis, correlational analysis, and regression analysis were most frequently used over 30 years and the types of statistical analysis have become more diverse. Furthermore, the use of on-line questionnaires in research have been expanded in the recent 10 years. As research topics had been sophisticated, new methods of analysis such as multi-level analysis, survival analysis, and non-linear analysis were actively used. Finally, research results published over the past 30 years were summarized according to their research topics. Based on the content analysis, the direction of the future KJIOP and additional research topics were discussed.

keywords
내용분석, 산업 및 조직심리학, 학문의 정체성, 주제별 개관, 향후과제, content analysis, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, academic identity, overview of research topic, future suggestion

참고문헌

1.

유태용, 탁진국 (1998). 창간 10주년을 맞는 ‘한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직’의 ‘내용분석 및 앞으로의 제언’. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 11(1), 53-76.

2.

차재호 (1976). 한국심리학의 역사, 현황 및 사회과학 협동연구의 방향. 사회과학논문집, 1, 61-100.

3.

한국심리학회 (1996). 한국심리학회 50년사. 교육과학사.

4.

Aguinis, H., Ambrose, M. L., Cascio, W. F., Cropanzano, R. S., Mathieu, J. E., & Sanchez, J. I. (2003). I-O psychologists in business schools. Panel discussion presented at the 18th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.

5.

Aguinis, H., Joo, H., & Gottfredson, R. K. (2011). Why we hate performance management-And why we should love it. Business Horizons, 54(6), 503-507.

6.

Aguinis, H., Ramani, R. S., Campbell, P. K., Bernal-Turnes, P., Drewry, J. M., & Edgerton, B. T. (2017). Most frequently cited sources, articles, and authors in industrial-organizational psychology textbooks: Implications for the science-practice divide, scholarly impact, and the future of the field. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 10(4), 507-557.

7.

Aguinis, H., Bradley, K. J., & Brodersen, A. (2014). Industrial-organizational psychologists in business schools: Brain drain or eye opener?. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7(3), 284-303.

8.

Bartlett, D., & Francis-Smythe, J. (2016). Bridging the divide in work and organizational psychology: Evidence from practice. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(5), 615-630.

9.

Bliese, P. D., Edwards, J. R., & Sonnentag, S. (2017). Stress and well-being at work: A century of empirical trends reflecting theoretical and societal influences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 389-402.

10.

Blum, M. L., & Naylor, J. C. (1968). Industrial psychology: Its theoretical and social foundations. Harper & Row.

11.

Brown, T. C., O’Kane, P., Mazumdar, B., & McCracken, M. (2019). Performance management: A scoping review of the literature and an agenda for future research. Human Resource Development Review, 18(1), 47-82.

12.

Cascio, W. F., & Aguinis, H. (2008). Research in industrial and organizational psychology from 1963 to 2007: Changes, choices, and trends. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1062-1081.

13.

Cascio, W. F., & Montealegre, R. (2016). How technology is changing work and organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 349-375.

14.

Coovert, M. D., & Thompson, L. F. (2014). The psychology of workplace technology. New York, NY: Routledge/Psychology Press.

15.

DeNisi, A. S., & Murphy, K. R. (2017). Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress?. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 421-433.

16.

Gilliland, S. W., & Cortina, J. M. (1997). Reviewer and editor decision making in the journal review process. Personnel Psychology, 50(2), 427-452.

17.

Goler, L., Gale, J., & Grant, A. (2016). Let’s not kill performance evaluation yet. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2016/11/lets-not-kill-performance-evaluations-yet

18.

Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513-524.

19.

Hulin, C. L. (2014). Work and being: The meanings of work in contemporary society. In J. K. Ford, J. R. Hollenbeck, & A. M. Ryan (Eds.), The nature of work: Advances in psychological theory, methods, and practice (pp. 9-33). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.

20.

Lopes De Leao Laguna, L., Poell, R., & Meerman, M. (2019). Practitioner research for the professionalization of human resources practice: Empirical data from the Netherlands. Human Resource Development International, 22(1), 68-90.

21.

McCormick, E. J., & Tiffin, J. (1974). Industrial psychology(6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

22.

McFarland, L. A., & Ployhart, R. E. (2015). Social media: A contextual framework to guide research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(6), 1653-1677.

23.

Montealegre, R., & Cascio, W. F. (2017). Technology-driven changes in work and employment. Communications of the ACM, 60(12), 60-67.

24.

Muchinsky, P. M. (1997). Psychology applied to work(5th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

25.

Rock, D., & Jones, B. (2015). Why more and more companies are ditching performance ratings. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2015/09/whymore-and-more-companies-are-ditching-performance-ratings

26.

Rupp, D. E., & Beal, D. (2007). Checking in with the scientist-practitioner model: How are we doing?. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 45(1), 35-40.

27.

Salas, E., Kozlowski, S. W., & Chen, G. (2017). A century of progress in industrial and organizational psychology: Discoveries and the next century. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 589-598.

28.

Schein, E. H. (1978). Career dynamics: Matching individual and organizational needs. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

29.

Schein, E. H. (2015). Organizational psychology then and now: Some observations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 1-19.

30.

Schultz, D. P. (1982). Psychology and industry today: An introduction to industrial and organizational psychology(3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.

31.

Walker, H. J., Feild, H. S., Bernerth, J. B., & Becton, J. B. (2012). Diversity cues on recruitment websites: Investigating the effects on job seekers' information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 214-224.

32.

Walker, J. H., Feild, H. S., Giles, W. F., Armenakis, A. A., & Bernerth, J. B. (2009). Displaying Employee Testimonials on Recruitment Web Sites: Effects of Communication Media, Employee Race, and Job Seeker Race on Organizational Attraction and Information Credibility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1354-1364.

33.

World Bank. (2019). World Development Report 2019: The changing nature of work. Washington, DC: World Bank.

logo