-검정.jpg){kind=logo}
- P-ISSN1225-598X
- E-ISSN2982-6292
정보공유공간의 품질 측정지표 개발에 관한 탐색적 연구
An Exploratory Study of Developing a Measurement Tool for the Quality of Information Commons
기선아 (연세대학교)
초록
본 연구는 정보공유공간의 품질 측정지표 개발을 위한 설문항목 개발을 목적으로 하였다. 정보공유공간은 도서관 이용자들이 다양한 교육, 연구, 문화 활동을 경험할 수 있는 물리적, 기술적, 지적 공간으로, 최근 도서관 이용자 간의 지식 공유와 상호관계를 장려하기 위하여 인기를 얻고 있다. 또한 정보공유공간은 협업활동, 학습, 휴식을 위한 공간을 제공하는데, 이러한 장점과 유용성에도 불구하고 명확히 정보공유공간의 품질에 대한 측정도구가 없다. 여기에서는 도서관 이용자의 정보공유공간에 관한 인식과 정보공유공간에 대한 인지된 품질에 영향을 미치는 요소들을 추출하기 위하여 심층면담, 선행연구 대조 및 사전조사를 수행하였다. 선행연구와 설문 초기 아이템은 분류와 클러스터링을 통하여 데이터 내의 주요 개념이 도출되었다. 그 후 사전조사를 통하여 예비 설문문항의 타당도가 검증되었다. 연구의 의의는 도서관 서비스 품질평가에 대한 연구의 영역을 확장시키고 이용의도를 고려한 새로운 평가 체계를 제시한 점이다.
- keywords
- 정보공유공간, 품질 측정지표, 서비스 품질, information commons, service quality, measurement development
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to develop a measurement tool for the quality of information commons. Information commons is a physical, technological, social, and intellectual place where library users can experience various educational, research, and cultural activities. It is recently gaining popularity and several libraries have implemented it to help users share knowledge and interact with each other. It also intends to provide a place for collaboration, learning, and rest. Despite its benefits and usefulness, there is no measurement tool explicitly designed for the quality of information commons. This study used in-depth personal interview, compared prior studies, and conducted a pilot study to elicit library users' perceptions on information commons and factors influencing on the perceived quality of information commons. Groups of initial items were emerged through classifying and clustering key concepts in the data. Then, the validity of the items were verified through a pilot study. The findings of this study will be useful for developing more reliable and valid survey measurement tool.
- keywords
- 정보공유공간, 품질 측정지표, 서비스 품질, information commons, service quality, measurement development
참고문헌
Albanese, A. R. 2003. “Deserted no more.” Library Journal, 128(7): 34-36.
Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. 2003. “Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice.” Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1): 64-77.
Bailey, R., & Tierney, B. 2002. “Information commons redux: Concept, evolution, and transcending the tragedy of the commons.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 28(5): 277-286.
Bailey, D. R., & Tierney, B. G. 2008. Transforming Library Service through Information Commons: Case Studies for the Digital Age. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
Beagle, D. R., Bailey, D. R., & Tierney, B. 2006. The Information Commons Handbook. New York: Neal Schuman Publishers.
Bennett, S. 2003. Libraries Designed for Learning. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources. [online]. [cited 2010.10.1]. <http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub122/pub122web.pdf>.
Cook, C., & Heath, F. 2001. “Users’ perceptions of library service quality: A LibQUAL+™: Qualitative interview study.” Library Trends, 49: 548-584.
Cook, C., & Thompson, B. 2001. “Psychometric properties of scores from the web-based LibQUAL+™: Study of perceptions of library service quality.” Library Trends, 49: 585-604.
Cowgill, A., Beam, J., & Wess, L. 2001. “Implementing an information commons in a university library.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 27(6): 432-439.
Cronin, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. 1992. “Measuring service quality: A reexamination and extension.” Journal of Marketing, 56(3): 55-68.
Dillenbourg, P. 1999. “What do you mean by collaborative learning?” Collaborative-Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, 1-19. Oxford: Elsevier.
Fitzpatrick, E. B., Moore, A. C., & Lang, B. W. 2008. “Reference librarians at the reference desk in a learning commons: A mixed methods evaluation.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(3): 231-238.
Gayton, J. T. 2008. “Academic libraries: “social” or “communal?” The nature and future of academic libraries.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(1): 60-66.
Halbert, M. 1999. “Lessons from the information commons frontier.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 25(2): 90-91.
Hara, N. 2007. “Information technology support for communities of practice: How public defenders learn about winning and losing in court.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(1): 76-87.
Heath, F., Kyrillidou, M., Webster, D., Choudhury, S., Hobbs, B., Lorie, M., & Flores, N. 2003. “Emerging tools for evaluating digital library services: Conceptual Adaptations of LibQUAL+ and CAPM.” Journal of Digital Information, 4(2). [online]. [cited 2010.8.1].<http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/viewArticle/102/101>.
Holsti, O. R. 1969. Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Jabocy, J., & O’Brien, N. P. 2005. “Assessing the impact of reference services provided to undergraduate students.” College & Research Libraries, 66(4): 324-340.
Jung, M. K., & Nam, T. W. 2007. “A study of information commons as model of library integrated service.” Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 41(4): 347-363.
Killick, S. 2008. An Introduction to LibQUAL+. London: Aslib Engineering Group AGM, Imperial College of Science and Technology. [online]. [cited 2009.8.5]. <http://old.libqual.org/documents/admin/Killick_AslibEngineeringGroup.ppt>.
Krippendorf, K. 1980. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Lincoln, Y. S. 2002. “Insights into library services and users from qualitative research.” Library & Information Science Research, 24: 3-16.
MacWhinnie, L. A. 2003. “The information commons: The academic library of the future.” Portal: Librarians and the Academy, 3(2): 241-257.
Malenfant, C. 2006. “The information commons as a collaborative workspace.” Reference Services Review, 34(2): 279-286.
Murray, D. 2011. “Information Commons and Beyond.” [online]. [cited 2011.1.10]. <http://infocommonsandbeyond.blogspot.com/>.
Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. 2003. Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Neuman, W. L. 1997. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 3rd ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Nonaka, I., Toyoma, R., & Konno, N. 2000. “SECI, Ba and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation.” Long Range Planning, 33(1): 5-34.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithamal, V., & Berry, L. 1985. “A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research.” Journal of Marketing, 49(4): 41-50.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithamal, V., & Berry, L. 1988. “SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality.” Journal of Retailing, 64(1): 12-40.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithamal, V., & Berry, L. 1994a. “Alternative scales for measuring service quality: A comparative assessment based on psychometric and diagnostic criteria.” Journal of Retailing, 70(3): 201-230.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithamal, V., & Berry, L. 1994b. “Reassessment of expectations as a comparison standard in measuring service quality: Implications for further research.” Journal of Marketing, 58(1): 111-124.
Roberts, R. L. 2007. “The evolving landscape of the learning commons.” Library Review, 56(9): 803-810.
Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. 2000. Data Management and Analysis Methods. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln. eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd Ed., 769-802. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Silver, H. 2007. Use of Collaborative Spaces in an Academic Library. Ph.D. diss., Simmons College, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Somerville, M. M., & Collins, L. 2008. “Collaborative design: A learner-centered library planning approach.” The Electronic Library, 26(6): 803-820.
Thompson, B., Cook, C., & Thompson, R. 2002. “Reliability and structure of LibQUAL+™ Scores: Measuring perceived library service quality.” Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 2(1): 3-12.
Van Scoyoc, A. M., & Cason, C. 2006. “The electronic academic library: Undergraduate research behavior in a library without books.” Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 6(1): 47-58.
Weber, R. P. 1990. Basic Content Analysis. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수