바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

  • P-ISSN1225-598X
  • E-ISSN2982-6292

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.48 No.3

Citation Share

A Study on the Development of Standard Indicators for College & University Libraries’ Evaluation

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2014, v.48 no.3, pp.303-334
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2014.48.3.303




& (2014). A Study on the Development of Standard Indicators for College & University Libraries’ Evaluation. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 48(3), 303-334, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2014.48.3.303

Abstract

This study aims to develop standard indicators and methodology for college & university libraries’evaluation based on the agreement among various stake-holders, then suggests a new evaluation system. For the goal, we identify purposes and required conditions, then develop indicators for the evaluation through open-ended interviews, a questionnaire survey, and focus group for reaching an agreement on the included indicators among the stake-holders, finally we construct the overall evaluation structure and weighting system. The overall structure is developed based on process-centered approach, then both the internal and functional viewpoint and external and service-oriented viewpoint are considered. The weighting system is based on the balance among the process categories, such as resources, process, and output elements. Additionally, we suggest methodology for the evaluation and annual improvement process for ongoing improvement of the evaluation system. We expect that the results from this study will contribute not only to the evaluation activities but also to active discussions on library performance and its predictor factors.

keywords
대학도서관평가, 과정 중심적 접근, 성과, 평가과정, 평가도구개선, Evaluation in College & University Libraries, Process-Centered Approach, Performance, Evaluation Process, Evaluation Tool Improvement

Reference

1.

곽동철, 윤정옥. 2011. 대학도서관 평가지표의 개발에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지 , 45(2):309-324.

2.

곽동철, 심경, 윤정옥. 2009. 사서자격제도 개선방안 도출 및 적용에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지 , 43(2): 193-213.

3.

교육과학기술부. 2008. 대학경쟁력 강화를 위한 대학도서관 발전계획(2009~2013) . 서울: 교육과학기술부.

4.

신민식, 권중생. 2006. 경영의 이해 . 파주: 법문사.

5.

심원식, 이은철. 2013. LibQUAL+를 활용한 국내 대학도서관 서비스 품질 측정 사례 조사. 정보관리학회지 , 30(2): 245-268.

6.

유현숙. 2013. 대학도서관 평가지표에 대한 통계적 고찰. 사대도협회지 , 14. <http://kpula.or.kr/public/societypaper/view.php?oid=236&loid=19>

7.

윤희윤. 2001a. 대학도서관 평가지표의 다의성과 지향성. 한국도서관 정보학회지 , 32(3): 91-115.

8.

윤희윤. 2001b. 국내외 대학도서관 평가지표의 분석. 정보관리학회지 , 18(3): 239-263.

9.

윤희윤. 2001c. 국내 대학도서관의 평가모형 개발에 관한 연구. 한국도서관 정보학회지 , 32(4):45-75.

10.

이유정, 박진혁, 조석주, 추가희. 2012. 대학도서관 시범평가 분석 및 평가방안 제안. 사대도협회지 , 13: 167-193.

11.

Brophy, Peter. 2001. “Assessing the performance of electronic library services: The equinox project.” New Review of Academic Librarianship, 7(1): 3-17.

12.

Crawford, John. 2000. Evaluation of Library and Information Services. 2nd Ed. London, UK:Aslib.

13.

Daft, Richard L. 2006. The New Era of Manangement. Mason, OH: South-Western.

14.

Ellis, Simon, Heaney, Michael, Meunier, Pierre and Poll, Roswitha. 2009. “Global library statistics.” IFLA Journal, 35(2): 123-130.

15.

Fuegi, David and Jennings, Martin. 2004. “International Library Statistics: Trends and Commentary based on the Libecon Data.”<http://collections-r.europarchive.org/dnb/20070703083323/http://www.libecon.org/pdf/In ternationalLibraryStatistic.pdf>

16.

Green, David and Kyrillidou, Martha. 2012. “Procedures Manual.”<http://www.libqual.org/documents/LibQual/publications/ProceduresManual.pdf>

17.

Gulick, Lurher and Urwick, Lyndall. 1937. Papers on the Science of Administration. New York, NY: Institute of Public Administration, Columbia University.

18.

Hellriegel, Don, Jackson, Susan E. and Slocum, Jr., John W. 2005. Management: A Competency - Based Approach. 10th Ed. Mason, OH: South-Western.

19.

International Organization for Standardization. 2008. ISO 11620: Information and Documentation - Library Performance Indicators. 2nd Ed. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.

20.

International Organization for Standardization. 2006. ISO 2789: Information and Documentation - International Library Statistics. 4th Ed. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.

21.

Lancaster, Frederick W. 1988. If You Want to Evaluate Your Library. Champaign, IL:University of Illinois.

22.

National Information Standards Organization. 2004. “NISO Z39.7-201X, Information Services and Use: Metrics & Statistics for Libraries and Information Providers - Data Dictionary.”<http://www.niso.org>

23.

Phan, Tai, Hardesty, Laura, Hug, Jamie and Sheckells, Cindy L. 2011. “Documentation for the Academic Libraries Survey(ALS) Public-use Data File: Fiscal Year 2010(NCES 2011-367).” Washington, DC; National Center for Education Statistics. <http://nces.ed.gov>

24.

Powell, Ronald R. 2006. “Evaluation research: An overview.” Library Trends, 55(1): 102-120.

25.

Wren, Daniel A., Bedeian, Author G. and Breeze, John D. 2002. “The foundations of Henri Fayol’s administrative theory.” Management Decision, 40(9): 906-918.

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

e-Submission OA Policy