바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

공공도서관 실행공동체의 형성과정과 지속가능성을 위한 연구

A Study on the Formation Process and Sustainability of Community of Practice in Public Libraries

한국문헌정보학회지 / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2018, v.52 no.1, pp.113-131
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2018.52.1.113
박성우 (광주대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

이 연구는 공공도서관 실행공동체의 형성과 지속을 위하여 매개자로서의 사서의 필요성을 증명하고자 하였다. 따라서 이 연구에서는 공공도서관 실행공동체의 형성과정을 알아보기 위해 문헌연구를, 실행공동체의 매개자로서 사서의 인식을 알아보기 위해 설문조사를 실시하였다. 그 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 실행공동체(CoP)는 영역, 공동체, 실천을 바탕으로 지식을 순환시키는 공동체이다. 둘째, 실행공동체가 유지되기 위해서는 조직 내 리더와 조직 외 관리자의 중간 역할을 하며 운영을 지원하고 지식공유를 독려하는 매개자가 필요하다. 셋째, 공공도서관 사서가 발굴한 프로그램과 동아리는 잠재적 실행공동체이다. 이 잠재적 실행공동체는 참여자였던 공공도서관 프로그램의 수혜자가 프로그램의 제공자로 환원됨으로써 지속가능한 실행공동체로 발전한다. 넷째, 그러므로 공공도서관에서 실행공동체의 매개자는 사서이다.

keywords
Public Library, Communities of Practice, Librarian, Coordinator, 공공도서관, 실행공동체, 실천공동체, 사서, 매개자

Abstract

The study is to prove the necessity of librarian as the coordinator for the building and sustenance of “Community of Practice” in public libraries. Therefore, The study reviews literatures and conducts a survey how librarians think of their work from the perspective of CoP. The results of this study are as follows: “Community of Practice(CoP)” is the kind of community composed of “Domain”, “Community” and “Practice” for knowledge circulation; The coordinator neither leader in CoP nor manager outside of CoP is necessary to sustain CoP by supporting management of CoP and promoting knowledge sharing; The programs and clubs designed by public librarians are potential CoPs; The potential CoPs turn into the sustainable CoPs when the participants of programs turn into the directors of programs; It means the coordinator of CoP is librarian in case of public libraries.

keywords
Public Library, Communities of Practice, Librarian, Coordinator, 공공도서관, 실행공동체, 실천공동체, 사서, 매개자

참고문헌

1.

김미영. 2015. 현대사회에 존재하는 공동체의 여러 형식. 사회와이론, 27, 181-218.

2.

문화체육관광부. 2016. 『2016년 독서진흥에 관한 연차보고서』. 서울: 문화체육관광부.

3.

도서관정보정책위원회. 2017. 『2017년도(’16년 실적) 전국 도서관 운영평가 지표』. 서울: 문화체육관광부.

4.

박성우. 2016. 실행공동체 사례연구를 통한 공공도서관 역할 변화에 관한 연구. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 47(4), 339-358.

5.

주옥채, 김남숙, 기영화. 2012. 지역사회의 주민 자생적 CoP의 형성과정 연구. 한국지방자치학회보, 24(4), 161-186.

6.

Archer, N. 2006. A Classification of Communities of Practice. In Coakes, E., and Clarke, S. ed. 2006. Encyclopedia of Communities of Practice in Information and Knowledge Management. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference. 21-29.

7.

Belzowski, N. F., Ladwig, P. J., and Miller, T. 2013. Crafting Identity, Collaboration, and Relevance for Academic Librarians Using Communities of Practice. Collaborative Librarianship, 5(1), 3-15.

8.

Henrich, K. J., and Attebury, R. 2010. Communities of Practice at an Academic Library:A New Approach to Mentoring at the University of Idaho. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(2), 158-165.

9.

Kim, J. A. 2015. Intergrating Communities of Practice into Library Services. Collaborative Librarianship, 7(2), 47-55.

10.

Koliba, C., and Gajda, R. 2009. ‘Communities of Practice' as an Analytical Construct:Implications for Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration, 32, 97-135.

11.

McDermott, R. 2000. Community Development as a Natural Step: Five Stages of Community Development. KM Review, 3(5), 1-10.

12.

Nickols, F. 2003. Communities of Practice: An Overview. [online] [cited 2017. 12. 29.]<http://www.nickols.us/CoPOverview.pdf>

13.

Pemberton, J., Marvin, S., and Stalker, B. 2007. Scratching beneath the Surface of Communities of (Mal)practice. The Learning Organization, 14(1), 62-73.

14.

Snyder, W. M., and Wenger, E. 2010. Our World as a Learning System: A Communitiesof-Practice Approach. In Blackmore, C. ed. 2010. Social Learning Systems and Communities of Practice. London: Springer, 107-124.

15.

The Harwood Institute for Public Innovation. 2015. Communities have Challenge. Libraries can Help: A Step-by-step Guide to “Turning Outward” To your Community. [online][cited 2016. 9. 23.]<http://www.ala.org/tools/sites/ala.org.tools/files/content/LTCGettingStarted_DigitalWor kbook_final010915.pdf>

16.

Wenger, E. C., and Snyder, W. M. 2000. Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier. Harvard Business Review, January-February: 139-145.

17.

Wenger, E., McDermott, R. and Snyder, W. M. 2002. Cultivating Communities of Practice. Massachusetts, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

18.

Wenger-Trayner, E. and Wenger-Trayner, B. 2015. Introduce to Communities of Practice. [online] [cited 2016. 11. 11.]<http://wenger-trayner.com/introduction-to-communities-of-practice/>

19.

Wyk, J. V. 2005. “Communities of Practice in an academic library: a run on the wild side?”In Proceedings of the 5th ICAHIS Conference, 4-7 July 2005, Onderstepoort: University of Pretoria, South Africa: 97-102.

20.

Yan, J., and Assimakopoulos, D. 2006. Foral Work Groups and Communities of Practice.In Coakes, E., and Clarke, S. ed. 2006. Encyclopedia of Communities of Practice in Information and Knowledge Management. Hershey: Idea Group Reference. 194-197.

21.

Yon, S. B. H. and Albert, G. 2013. “Developing Library Professionals: The Influence of Communities of Practice.” presented at IFLA WLIC 2013 - Singapore - Future Libraries:Infinite Possibilities, 15-23 August 2013, Singapore: The Suntec Singapore International Convention & Exhibition Centre: 1-11.

한국문헌정보학회지