바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

메뉴

상담심리 연구에서 매개효과와 조절효과 검증: 개념적 구분 및 자료 분석 시 고려 사항

Testing Mediator and Moderator Effects in Counseling Psychology Research: Conceptual Distinction and Statistical Considerations

초록

최근 들어 매개효과 및 조절효과를 검증한 논문들이 상담심리학 분야에서 꾸준히 증가하고 있다. 매개효과와 조절효과는 상담심리학자들이 관심을 두고 있는 다양한 심리 현상에 대한 이해를 증진시킬 수 있다는 점에서 그 의미가 크다. 특히, 변인들 간에 존재하는 복잡한 관계를 이해할 수 있을 뿐 아니라 상담실제에서 보다 초점을 두고 개입해야 할 변인들을 확인할 수 있다. 그러나 많은 연구자들이 매개효과와 조절효과가 정확히 무엇을 의미하고 어떻게 다른지에 대해 여전히 혼란스러워 하고 있는 듯하다. 이에 본 논문에서는 매개효과와 조절효과를 개념적으로 구분하고, 매개효과 및 조절효과를 검증하기 위한 자료 분석 절차를 기술하였다. 매개효과를 검증하는 방법으로는 다중 회귀분석과 구조방정식 모형을 소개하였고, 구조방정식 모형을 적용해서 자료를 분석할 때 많이 사용하는 문항꾸러미와 부트스트래핑 절차에 관해서도 기술하였다. 조절효과를 검증하는 방법으로는 위계적 회귀분석과 구조방정식 모형을 소개하였는데, 특히 예측변인과 조절변인이 모두 연속변인일 경우 구조방정식 모형을 적용할 때 많이 사용되는 Ping(1996)의 2단계 접근을 소개하였다.

keywords
매개효과, 조절효과, 회귀분석, 구조방정식 모형, mediator effect, moderator effect, regression analysis, structural equation modeling

Abstract

Recently, the number of studies examining mediator and moderator effects has been increasing within the field of counseling psychology. Both types of effects hold much potential for furthering our understanding of complicated relations among variables and also identifying variables that counselors may need to focus their attention in counseling practice. However, there is confusion over the meaning of and differences between mediator and moderator effects in counseling psychology research. The purposes of this article a re to (a) conceptually differentiate between mediator and moderator effects and (b) describe how to test each type of effect. The author focuses on the use of multiple regression and structural equation modeling to detect mediator and moderator effects. In particular, the author introduces Ping's (1996) two-step approach to analyzing moderator effects using structural equation modeling in studies involving continuous moderators.

keywords
매개효과, 조절효과, 회귀분석, 구조방정식 모형, mediator effect, moderator effect, regression analysis, structural equation modeling

참고문헌

1.

김민선, 서영석 (2009). 평가염려 완벽주의와 사회불안의 관계: 부정적 평가에 대한 두려움과 자기제시동기의 매개효과 검증. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 28(3), 525-545.

2.

안하얀, 서영석 (2010). 성인애착, 심리적 디스트레스, 대인관계문제: 피드백에 대한 반응, 정서적 대처, 사회적 지지 추구의 매개효과 검증. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 22(3), 575-603.

3.

조화진, 서영석 (2010). 부모애착, 분리-개별화, 성인애착, 대학생활적응, 심리적 디스트레스의 관계 - 대학신입생을 대상으로. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 22(2), 385- 411.

4.

Aguinis, H. (1995). Statistical power problems with moderated multiple regression in management research. Journal of Management Research, 21, 1141-1158.

5.

Aguinis, H., & Pierce, C. A. (1998). Statistical power computations for detecting dichotomous moderator variables with moderated multiple regression. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 668-676.

6.

Aguinis, H., & Stone-Romero, E. F. (1997). Methodological artifacts in moderated multiple regression and their effects on statistical power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 192- 206.

7.

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

8.

Augustus-Horvath, C. L., & Tylka, T. L. (2009). A test and extension of objection theory as it predicts disordered eating: Does women's age matter? Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 253-265.

9.

Bagozzi, R. P., & Edwards, J. R. (1998). A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 45-87.

10.

Bandalos, D. L. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 78-102.

11.

Bandalos, D. L. (2008). Is parceling really necessary? A comparison of results from item parceling and categorical variable methodology. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 211-240.

12.

Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (2001). Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp.269-296). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

13.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173- 1182.

14.

Bollen, K. A., & Paxton, P. (1998). Interaction of latent variables in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 5, 267-293.

15.

Brown, R. L. (1997). Assessing specific mediational effects in complex theoretical models. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 142-156.

16.

Busemeyer, J., & Jones, L. R. (1983). Analysis of multiplicative causal rules when the causal variables are measured with error. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 549-562.

17.

Chaplin, W. F. (1991). The next generation in moderation research in personality psychology. Journal of Personality, 59, 143-178.

18.

Ciarrochi, J., Leeson, P., & Heaven P. C. L. (2009). A longitudinal study into the interplay between problem orientation and adolescent well-being. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 441-449.

19.

Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

20.

Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310-357.

21.

Constantine, M. G. (2007). Racial microaggressions against African American Clients in cross-racial counseling relationships. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54, 1-16.

22.

Flamenbaum, R., & Holden, R. R. (2007). Psychache as a mediator in the relationship between perfectionism and suicidality. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54, 51-61.

23.

Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychological research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 115-134.

24.

Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women's lived experience and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173-206.

25.

Grissom, R. (2000). Heterogeneity of variance in clinical data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 155-165.

26.

Holmbeck, G. N. (1997). Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literature. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 599-610.

27.

Hong, S., Malik, M. L., & Lee, M. K. (2003). Testing configural, metric, scalar, and latent mean invariance across gender in sociotropy and autonomy using non-western sample. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 636-654.

28.

Hoyle, R. H., & Robinson, J. I. (2003). Mediated and moderated effects in social psychological research: Measurement, design, and analysis issues. In C. Sansone, C. Morf, & A. T. Panter (Eds.), Handbook of methods in social psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

29.

Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R., & Wan, C. K. (1990). Interaction effects in multiple regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

30.

Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1981). Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5, 602-619.

31.

Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3-34.

32.

Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T., Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp.233-265). New York: Oxford University Press.

33.

Larsen, H., Branje, S. J. T., Van der Valk, I., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2007). Friendship quality as a moderator between perception of interparental conflicts and maladjustment in adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 549-558.

34.

Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79-122.

35.

Ludwikowski, W. M. A., Vogel, D., & Armstrong, P. I. (2009). Attitudes toward career counseling: The role of public and self-stigma. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 408-416.

36.

MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D. D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7, 19-40.

37.

MacKinnon, D. P. (2000). Contrasts in multiple mediator models. In J. S. Rose, L. Chassin, C. C. Presson, & S. J. Sherman (Eds.), Multivariate applications in substance use research: New methods for new questions (pp.141-160). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

38.

MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.

39.

MacKinnon, D. P., & Dwyer, J. H. (1993). Estimating mediated effects in prevention studies. Evaluation Review, 17, 144-158.

40.

MacKinnon, D. P., Goldberg, L., Clarke, G. N., Elliot, D. L., Cheong, J., Lapin, A., et al. (2001). Mediating mechanisms in a program to reduce intentions to use anabolic steroids and improve exercise self-efficacy and dietary behavior. Prevention Science, 2, 15-27.

41.

MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. (2000). Mediation, confounding, and suppression: Different names for the same effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173-181.

42.

MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83-104.

43.

Mason, C. A., Tu, S., & Cauce, A. M. (1996). Assessing moderator variables: Two computer simulation studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 45-62.

44.

Moradi, B., Dirks, D., & Matteson, A. V. (2005). Roles of sexual objectification experiences and internalization of standards of beauty in eating disorder symptomatology: A test and extension of objectification. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 420-428.

45.

Moulder, B. C., & Algina, J. (2002). Comparison of methods for estimating and testing latent variable interactions. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 1-19.

46.

Pederson, E. L., & Vogel, D. L. (2007). Male gender role conflict and willingness to seek counseling: Testing a mediation model on college-aged men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54, 373-384.

47.

Ping, R. A. (1996a). Estimating latent variable interactions and quadratics: The state of this art. Journal of Management, 22, 163-183.

48.

Ping, R. A. (1996b). Latent variable interaction and quadratic effect estimation: A two-step technique using structural equation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 166-175.

49.

Russell, D. W., Kahn, J. H., Spoth, R., & Altmaier, E. M. (1998). Analyzing data from experimental studies: A latent variable structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 18-29.

50.

Salafia, E. H. B., Gondoli, D. M., Corning, A. F., McEnery, A. M., & Grundy, A. M. (2007). Psychological distress as a mediator of the relation between perceived maternal parenting and normative maladaptive eating among adolescent girls. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54, 434-446.

51.

Shneidman, E. S. (1993). Suicide as psychache. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 181, 145-147.

52.

Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445.

53.

Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp.290-312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.

54.

Stone-Romero, E. F., & Anderson, L. E. (1994). Techniques for detecting moderating effects: Relative statistical power of multiple regression and the comparison of subgroup-based correlation coefficients. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 354-359.

55.

Tokar, D. M., Withrow, J. R., Hall, R. H., & Moradi, B. (2003). Psychological separation, attachment security, vocational self-concept crystallization, and career indecision: A structural equation analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 3-19.

56.

Vogel, D. L., Wade, N. G., & Hackler, A. H. (2007). Perceived public stigma and the willingness to seek counseling: The mediating roles of self-stigma and attitudes toward counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54, 40-50.

57.

Wegener, D., & Fabrigar, L. (2000). Analysis and design for nonexperimental data addressing causal and noncausal hypotheses. In H. T. Reis & C. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp.412-450). New York: Cambridge University Press.

58.

Wei, M., Ku, T. Y., & Russell D. W. (2008). Moderating effects of three coping strategies and self-esteem on perceived discrimination and depressive symptoms: A minority stress model for Asian international students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55, 451-462.

59.

West, S. G., Aiken, L. S., & Krull, J. L. (1996). Experimental personality designs: Analysing categorical by continuous variable interactions. Journal of Personality, 64, 1-49.

60.

Widaman, K. F., Ferrer, E., & Conger, R. D. (2010). Factorial invariance within longitudinal structural equation models: Measuring the same construct across time. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 10-18.

61.

Widaman, K. F., & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In K. J. Bryant, M. Windle, & S. G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp.281–324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

logo