바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

ISSN : 1229-067X

Article Contents

Prev
e-Submission

Vol.26 No.2

Citation Share

The Korean Version of Objectified Body Consciousness Scales(K-OBCS): Development and validation

Korean Journal of Psychology: General / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2007, v.26 no.2, pp.329-349



& (2007). The Korean Version of Objectified Body Consciousness Scales(K-OBCS): Development and validation. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 26(2), 329-349.

Abstract

To develop a Korean version of Objectified Body Consciousness Scales(McKinley and Hyde, 1996) which can be adapted to Korean college students regardless of gender, two studies were performed. Total number of respondents were 431(125 female college students in study 1 and 158 female and 148 male students in study 2). The 3 factor structure of the Korean version(K-OBCS) - surveillance, shame, and control belief - was the same as the original version. But, further confirmatory fator analysis results showed that 2 factor structure of surveillance and shame was better than the 3 factor structure in which control belief was included. The level of reliability coefficients of Surveillance scale and Shame scale were acceptable, and those two scales showed negative correlations with body-esteem, self-esteem, and subjective well-being. They had significant predictive power to the intentions of body-related consumptions such as diet, cosmetic surgery, and exercise as well. But, Control-Belief scale failed to show acceptable levels of reliabilities, discriminant-convergent validity, and criterion-related validity. Authors suggested that the Surveillance and Body Shame sub-scales in K-OBCS had enough psychometric qualities. Regarding the Control Belief scale, authors interpreted the concept as a kind of self-efficacy and suggested that the scale could be a useful tool for body image studies if the psychometric properties of the scale could be improved. The implications of the results were discussed in terms of gender differences in objectified body consciousness.

keywords
신체이미지, 객체화 신체의식, 신체감시성, 신체수치심, 신체통제신념, 척도개발, 한국판 객체화 신체의식 척도(K-OBCS), body image, objectified body consciousness, surveillance, body shame, control belief, scale development, K-OBCS

Reference

1.

김완석 (2007). 전반적 신체존중감 척도(KOBES): 개발 및 성차 탐색. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 12(2), 231-253.

2.

김완석, 차주화 (2006). 신체가치와 소비행동: 척도개발과 활용을 위한 탐색연구. 한국심리학회지: 소비자광고, 7(3), 455-485.

3.

김완석, 김영진 (1997). 주관적 안녕척도: 공동생활 및 활동과의 연관. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제. 3(1), 61-82.

4.

김완석, 김정식 (2007). 동아시아 여대생들의 신체가치관과 신체존중감: 한국, 중국, 일본의 비교. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 13(4). (출판중).

5.

김완석, 유연재 (2007). 신체가치척도의 개발과 타당화: 신체조작성척도와 신체편향성척도. 한국심리학회지: 일반. 26(1), 1-21.

6.

박은아 (2003). 신체존중감이 주관적 안녕감에 미치는 영향에 관한 비교문화적 연구: 한국과 미국의 여대생을 대상으로. 한국심리학회지:일반, 22(2), 35-56.

7.

손은정 (2007). 공적 자기의식, 사회문화적 가치의 내면화 및 신체상에 대한 태도가 성형의도에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지:여성, 12(1), 63-81.

8.

이주일 (1988). 이분척도와 Likert형 7점 척도의 신뢰도, 타당도, 반응양식의 비교: 검색척도와 자기의식척도를 대상으로. 서울대학교 석사학위청구논문.

9.

전병제 (1974). 자아 개념 측정 가능성에 관한 연구. 연세논총, 11.

10.

조선명 (2000). 외모에 대한 사회문화적 태도와 신체이미지가 의복추구혜택에 미치는 영향. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위 청구논문.

11.

Bartky, S. L. (1988). Foucault, femininity, and the modernization of patriarchal power. In I. Diamond, & L. Quinby (Eds.), Feminism and Foucault: Reflections on resistance (61-86). Boston: Northeastern University Press.

12.

Carver, C. S. and Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and Self-Regulation: a Control-Theory Approach to Human Behavior. Springer, New York.

13.

Cash, T. F., Winstead, B. A., & Janda, L. H. (1986). The great American shape-up. Psychology Today, April, 30-37.

14.

Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S.(1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment. 49, 71-75.

15.

Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 522-527.

16.

Forbes, G. B., Jobe, R. L., & Revak, J. A. (2006). Relationships between dissatisfaction with specific body characteristics and the Sociocultural Attitude Toward Appearance Questionnaire-3 and Objectified Body Consciousness Scale. Body Image, 3, 295-300.

17.

Fredrickson, B., & Roberts, T.(1997). Objectification theory: toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173-206.

18.

Garner, D. M. (2002). Body image and anorexia nervosa. In T. F. Cash, & T. Pruzinsky (Eds.) Body Image: A Handbook of Theory, Research, and Clinical Practice (295-303). New York: Guilford.

19.

Harrison, K., & Cantor, J.(1997). The relationship between media exposure and eating disorders. Journal of Communication, 47, 40-67.

20.

Heinberg. L. J., Thompson, J. K., & Stormer, S. (1995). Development and validation of the Sociocultural Attitude Toward Appearance Questionnaire. International Journal of Eating Disorder, 17(1), 81-89.

21.

Kretchmar, J. L.(2001). Objectified consciousness in african american and caucasian college-age women of varying physical activity levels. PH. D dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

22.

Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., & McKinley, N. M. (2006). A measure of objectified body consciousness for preadolescent and adolescent youth. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 1, 65-76.

23.

McKinley, N. M. (1998). Gender differences in undergraduates’ body esteem: The mediating effect of objectified body consciousness and actual/ideal weight discrepancy. Sex Roles, 39, 113–123.

24.

McKinley, N. M. (1999). Women and objectified body consciousness: Mothers’and daughters’ body experience in cultural, developmental, and familial context. Developmental Psychology, 35, 760–769.

25.

McKinley, N. M. (2006). Longitudinal gender differences in objectified body consciousness and weight-related attitudes and behaviors: Cultural and developmental contests in the transition from college. Sex Roles, 54, 159–173.

26.

McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The Objectified Body Consciousness Scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181-215.

27.

Mintz, L. B., & Betz, N. E. (1986). Sex differences in the nature, realism, and correlates of body image. Sex Roles, 15, 185-195.

28.

Morry, M. M., & Staska, S. L.(2001). Magazine exposure: Internalization, self-objectification, eating attitudes, and body satisfaction in male and female university students. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science. 33(4), 269–279.

29.

Murnen, S. K.(2003). Thin, sexy women and strong, muscular men: grade-school children's responses to objectified images of women and men. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 49(9), 427-437.

30.

Noll, S. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology and Women Quarterly, 22, 623-636.

31.

Roberts, T., &. Gettman, J. Y. (2004). Mere Exposure: Gender Differences in the Negative Effects of Priming a State of Self-Objectification. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 51(2), 17-28.

32.

Rodin, J., Silberstein, L., & Striegel-Moore, R.(1985). Women and Weight: A normative discontent. In T. B. Songeregger (Ed.), Psychology and Gender. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

33.

Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

34.

Shilling, C. (2000). 몸의 사회학 (임인숙 역). 서울:나남출판. (원본 출판년도는 1993).

35.

Spitzack, C. (1990). Confessing excess: Women and the politics of body reduction. Albany: State University of New York Press.

36.

Stiegel-Moore, R. H., & Franko, D. L. (2002). Body image issues among girls and women. In T. F. Cash, & T. Pruzinsky (Eds.) Body Image: A Handbook of Theory, Research, and Clinical Practice (183-191). New York: Guilford.

37.

Strelan, P., & Hargreaves, D. (2005). Reasons for exercise and body esteem: men’ responses to self-objectification. Sex Roles, 53, 495-503.

38.

Tiggemann. M. (2001). Person X situation interactions in body dissatisfaction. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 10, 65-70.

39.

Trampe, D., Stapel, D. A., & Siero, F. W. (2007). On models and vases: Body dissatisfaction and proneness to social comparison effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 106-118.

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

e-Submission OA Policy