바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

The effect of anticipated regret and self-efficacy on sunk cost fallacy behavior

Korean Journal of Psychology: General / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2008, v.27 no.3, pp.695-709


Abstract

This study examined the role of anticipated regret as well as the importance of individual differences in making decision under sunk cost situation. And this study investigated how the individual’s self-efficacy changes the influence of anticipated regret about withdrawal and persistence on the sunk cost fallacy behavior. Results showed that anticipating regret about persistence decreased sunk cost fallacy behavior but anticipating regret about withdrawal did not change it. Also, there was strong and significant effect of anticipated regret about persistence on the sunk cost fallacy behavior for individuals with a high self-efficacy. Especially, individuals with a high self-efficacy was more sensitive both anticipated regret about persistence and withdrawal than individuals with a low self-efficacy. This study indicates that the impact on sunk cost fallacy behavior of anticipated regret is moderated by self-efficacy. Therefore it suggests that the predictive power of anticipated regret on sunk cost fallacy behavior will be enhanced if individual differences such as self-efficacy are taken into account.

keywords
예상되는 후회, 자기효능감, 매몰비용 오류 행동, anticipated regret, self-efficacy, sunk cost fallacy behavior, anticipated regret, self-efficacy, sunk cost fallacy behavior

Reference

1.

곽준식 (2005). 매몰비용 효과의 매개변수 검증과 조절초점이 매몰비용 효과에 미치는 영향. 고려대학교 박사학위 논문.

2.

신승호, 이종택, 최인철 (2001). 자기 일에 대한 선택과 타인의 일에 대한 조언의 차이: 매몰비용 효과의 경우. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 15(3), 49-64.

3.

김아영 (1997). 학구적 실패에 대한 내성의 관련변인 연구. 교육심리연구, 11(2), 1-19.

4.

Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 124-140.

5.

Bakker, A. B., Buunk, B. P., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1997). The moderating role of self- efficacy beliefs in the relationship between anticipated feelings of regret and condom use. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 2001-2014.

6.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

7.

Bazerman, M. H., Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Wade-Benzoni, K. (1998). Negotiating with yourself and losing: Making decisions with competing internal preference. Academy of Management Review, 23, 225-241.

8.

Fineman, S. (2000). Emotion arenas revisited. In S. Fineman(Ed.), Emotion in organization(pp. 1-24). London: Sage.

9.

Hetts, J. J., Boninger, D. S., Armor, D. A., Gleicher, F., & Nathanson, A. (2000). The influence of anticipated counterfactual regret on behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 17, 345-368.

10.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.

11.

Knight, P. A., & Nadel, J. I. (1986). Humility revised: Self-esteem, information search, and policy consistency. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38, 196-206.

12.

Kok, G. J., de Vries, H., Mudde, A. N., & Strecher, V. J. (1991). Planned health education and the role of self-efficacy: Dutch research. Health Education Research, 6, 231-238.

13.

Larrick, R. P., Margan, J. N., & Nisbett, R. E. (1990). Teaching the use of cost-benefit reasoning in everyday life. Psychological Science, 6, 362-370.

14.

Levi, A. S. (1981). Escalating commitment and risk taking in dynamic decision behavior. Ph. D. Dissertation, Yale University Press.

15.

Miller, D. T., & Taylor, B. R. (1995). Counterfactual thought, regret, and superstition: How to avoid kicking yourself. In N. J. Roese & J. M. Olson(Eds), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking(pp.305-331). Mahwah, NJ: Erhaum.

16.

Moon, H. (2001). The two faces of conscientiousness: Duty and achievement striving in escalation of commitment dilemmas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 535-540.

17.

Moon, H., Hollenbeck, J. R., Humphrey, S. E., & Maue, B. (2003). The tripartite model of neuroticism and the suppression of depression and anxiety within an escalation of commitment dilemma. Journal of Personality, 71(3), 347-368.

18.

Nucifora, J., Gallosi, C., & Kashima, Y. (1993). Influence on condom use among undergraduates: Testing the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior. In D. J. Terry, C. Gallois, & M. McCamish(Eds.), The theory of reasoned action: Its application to AIDS-preventive behaviour(pp.47-64). Oxford, England: Pergamon.

19.

Schaubroeck, J., & Williams, S. (1993). Type A behavior pattern and escalating commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 862-867.

20.

Staw, B. M., & Ross, J. (1978). Commitment to a policy decision: A multiheoretical perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 40-64.

21.

Thaler, R. H. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 39-60.

22.

Thaler, R. H., & Johnson, E. J. (1990). Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choices. Management Science, 36, 643-660.

23.

Walsh, J. P. (1995). Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organizational Science, 6, 280-321.

24.

Whyte, G., & Saks, A. M. (2007). The effects of self-efficacy on behavior in Escalation situations. Human Performance, 20, 23-42.

25.

Whyte, G., Saks, A. M., & Hook, S. (1997). When success breeds failure: The role of self-efficacy in escalating commitment to a losing course of action. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 415-432.

26.

Wong, K. F. E., & Kwong, J. Y. Y. (2007). The role of anticipated regret in escalation of commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 545-554.

27.

Wong, K. F. E., Yik, M., & Kwong, J. Y. Y. (2006). Understanding the emotional aspects of escalation of commitment: The role of negative affect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 282-297.

28.

Wulfert, E., & Wan, C. K. (1993). Condom use: A self-efficacy model. Health Psychology, 12, 346-353.

Korean Journal of Psychology: General