바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

The significance of the KPA's Regulations of Reviewing Procedures for Research Integrity and the remaining tasks

Korean Journal of Psychology: General / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2010, v.29 no.1, pp.133-147

Abstract

The present paper introduced the principles, significance as well as the major contents of establishing the new KPA's Regulations of Reviewing Procedures for Research Integrity, which was made by KPA in 2009. KPA's Regulations of Reviewing Procedures for Research Integrity includes regulations on such unethical acts as plagiarism and double publication,, detailed regulations on publication, as well as the rules for reviewing procedures for unethical research acts. I also indicated the limits and the improvement to be needed in the future of this newly made Regulations. Finally, I also made some suggestions for future tasks for the improvement of the present Ethics Regulations of KPA, related to research ethics.

keywords
한국심리학회, 연구진실성심사, 운영세칙, 심리학자윤리규정, 앞으로의 과제, KPA, Regulation's of Reviewing Proceduares for Research Integrity, KPA's ethics code, future tasks

Reference

1.

APA (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct.

2.

Princeton University (2006). Rights, Rules and Responsibilities.

3.

김혜숙 (2009). 연구진실성심사 운영세칙 제정의 의의와 앞으로의 윤리규정 과제. 한국심리학회 2009 연차학술대회 학술발표논문집. pp.94-95.

4.

서울대학교 (2008). 서울대학교 연구진실성위원회 규정.

5.

이화여대 (2003). 연구진실성위원회 규정.

6.

정경미 (2009). 학과윤리위원회의 실질적 운영 및 고려 사항. 한국심리학회 2009 연차학술대회 학술발표논문집. pp.98-99.

7.

최훈석 (2009). 연구 진실성 세칙. 한국심리학회 2009 연차학술대회 학술발표논문집. pp.96-97.

8.

한국심리학회 (2003). 심리학자 윤리 규정.

9.

학술진흥재단 (2006). 연구윤리소개. 서울.

10.

한국학술진흥재단 (2007). 외국 대학의 연구윤리 확립 활동 사례. 서울

11.

한국학술진흥재단 (2007). 연구윤리실태조사.

12.

학술진흥재단 (2008). 제4차 연구윤리포럼-연구 윤리 확립을 위한 도전과 실천. 서울.

Korean Journal of Psychology: General