바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1229-067X

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.30 No.3
Citation Share

로샤 잉크 반점에 내재된 상대적 구조화 정도 검증

The Degree of Structural Ambiguity in the Rorschach Inkblots

한국심리학회지: 일반 / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2011, v.30 no.3, pp.853-868
임용현 (계명대학교)
이혜림 (계명대학교)
김남균 (계명대학교)
임용현, 이혜림, & 김남균. (2011). 로샤 잉크 반점에 내재된 상대적 구조화 정도 검증. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 30(3), 853-868.
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

초록

본 연구에서 로샤 잉크 반점들에 내재된 물리적인 특성을 한국인을 대상으로 하여 검증해 보았다. 이 목적을 수행하기 위해서 이중 강제 선택(2AFC) 과제를 채택하였으며, 참가자들은 두 개의 카드 중 더 명확한 카드를 선택하여 반점들 간의 상대적 구조화를 판별하였다. 특히 세대 간 이질성이 구조화 지각에 영향을 미치는가를 규명하기 위해서 실험은 아동(초등학생), 청소년(고등학생), 청년(대학생) 및 노인의 네 집단으로 분류하였으며, 더 나아가 각 연령집단을 남녀집단으로 다시 세분하여 시행하였다. 연구 결과에서 로샤 카드의 잉크 반점들이 구조적으로 이질적이며, 그런 이질성이 네 연령층에서 유사하게 나타난다는 사실을 발견하였다. 특히 Ⅴ번 카드가 가장 명확한 카드로, Ⅵ번, Ⅶ번, Ⅷ번, Ⅸ번 카드는 상대적으로 모호한 카드로 지각되었다. 하지만 세대 간 차이가 일부 카드에서 발견되었으며, 이런 차이는 Exner의 종합체계를 보완하는 자료로 고려되어야 할 것이다. 종합하면, 본 연구 결과에서 로샤 잉크 반점들이 구조화 정도가 상대적으로 상이하다는 사실, 즉 각 카드에 내재된 물리적 특성이 동일하지 않다는 사실을 발견하였다.

keywords
the Rorschach inkblot test, Structural ambiguity, Age difference, Critical bits, Exner's Comprehensive System, 로샤 잉크 반점, 구조적 모호성, 연령차, 결정적 부분, Exner 종합체계

Abstract

In this study, we explored the extent to which Koreans of different ages perceived structure in the Rorschach inkblots. To this end, a two alternative, forced choice task was employed in which Korean participants judged, of two cards presented, which one was more structured (i.e., more distinct or unambiguous). Participants comprised four age groups (elementary, high school, college, and older adults) to explore the effect of age differences. Results showed that participants reported different degrees of structure in the inkblots, with comparable response patterns across all age groups. Significantly, Card V was judged the most distinct and Cards VI, VII, VIII, and IX were judged the least distinct (i.e., more ambiguous). Nevertheless, an age effect was found between older adults and three younger age groups particularly in Cards I and X, a finding that needs to be taken into consideration in future efforts to revise the Rorschach scoring system at least for Koreans. Taken together, contrary to popular belief, not all Rorschach figures appear to be devoid of structure.

keywords
the Rorschach inkblot test, Structural ambiguity, Age difference, Critical bits, Exner's Comprehensive System, 로샤 잉크 반점, 구조적 모호성, 연령차, 결정적 부분, Exner 종합체계

참고문헌

1.

박종환, 권용철 (1989). 노인용 한국판 Mini- Mental State Examination(MMSE-K)의 표준화 연구: 구분점 및 진단적 타당도. 신경정신의학, 28, 508-513.

2.

홍상황 (2009). Exner의 종합체계에 근거한 한국형 아동 로르샤하 종합체계의 구성: 탐색적 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 28, 961-995.

3.

Ames, L. B. (1966). Changes in Rorschach response throughout the human life span. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 74, 89-125.

4.

Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1996). Psychological Testing (7th ed.). New York: Macmillan.

5.

Andronikof, A. (2008). Exneriana - II - The scientific legacy of John E. Exner Jr. Rorschachiana, 29, 81-107.

6.

Baughman, E. (1959). The effect of inquiry method on Rorschach color and shading scores. Journal of Projective Techniques, 23, 3-7.

7.

Beck, S. J. (1944). Rorschach’'s Test 1: Basic processes. NY: Grune & Stratton.

8.

Beck, S. J. (1945). Rorschach's Test 2: A Variety of Personality Pictures. NY: Grune & Stratton.

9.

Beck, S. J., Rabin, A. I., Tjiesen, W. C, Molish, H., & Thetford, W. N. (1950). The normal personality as projected in the Rorschach test. Journal of Psychology, 30, 241-298.

10.

Derogatis, L. R., Gorham, D. R., & Moseley, E. C. (1968). Structural vs. Interpretive Ambiguity: A Cross Cultural Study with the Holtzman Inkblots. Journal of Projective Techniques & Personality Assessment, 32, 66-73.

11.

Elsner, A. E., Berk, L., Burns, S. A., & Rosenberg, P. R. (1988). Aging and human cone photopigments. Journal of Optical Society of America A, 5, 2106–2112.

12.

Enns, J. T., & Girgus, J. S. (1985). Developmental changes in selective and integrative visual attention. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 40, 319-337.

13.

Exner, J. E. (1959). The influence of chromatic and achromatic color in the Rorschach. Journal of Projective Techniques, 23, 418-425.

14.

Exner, J. E. (1962). The effect of color on productivity in cards VIII, IX, X of the Rorschach. Journal of Projective Techniques, 26, 30–33.

15.

Exner, J. E. (1996). Critical bits and the Rorschach response process. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 464–477.

16.

Exner, J. E. (2000). A primer for Rorschach interpretation. Asheville, NC: Rorschach Workshops.

17.

Exner, J. E. (2003). The Rorschach: A Comprehensive System: Vol. 1. Basic foundations and principles of interpretation (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.

18.

Frank, L. K. (1939). Projective methods for the study of personality. The Journal of Psychology, 8, 389–413.

19.

Falk, G., & Falk, U. A. (2005). Youth culture and the generation gap. NY: Algora Publishing.

20.

Gerrig, R. J., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2009). Psychology and Life (박권생, 박태진, 성현란, 이종한, 최해림, 홍기원 역). 서울: 시그마프레스.

21.

Gogtay, N., Giedd, J. N., Lusk, L., Hayashi, K. M., Greenstein, D., Vaituzis, A. C., et al. (2004). Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 101, 8174-8179.

22.

Giedd, J. N., Snell, J. W., Lange, N., Rajapakse, J. C., Casey, B. J., Kozuch, P. L., et al. (1996) Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of human brain development: ages 4-18. Cerebral Cortex, 6, 551–560.

23.

Gregory, R. L. (1997). Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing (5th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

24.

Groth-Marnat, G. (2003). Handbook of psychological assessment (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

25.

Lawton, M. P., Kleban, M. H., Rajagopal, D., & Dean, J. (1992). Dimensions of affective experience in three age groups. Psychology and Aging, 7, 171-184.

26.

Leichsenring, F. (2004). The role of structure in the assessment of psychopathology. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20, 275-282.

27.

Meer, B. (1955). The relative difficulty of the Rorschach Cards. Journal of Projective Techniques, 19, 43-53.

28.

Murray, H. A. (1943). Thematic Apperception Test. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

29.

Murstein, B. I. (1963). Theory and research in projective techniques. Emphasizing the TAT. New York: Wiley.

30.

Murstein, B. I. (1970). Empirical Test of the Levels of Hypothesis with Five Projective Techniques. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 75, 38-44.

31.

Neiss, M. B., Leigland, L. A., Carlson, N. E., & Janowskya, J. S. (2009). Age differences in perception and awareness of emotion. Neurobiology of Aging, 30, 1305-1313.

32.

Peterson, C. A., & Schilling, K. M. (1983). Card pull in projective testing. Journal of Personality Assessment, 47, 265–275.

33.

Ranzoni, J. H., Grant, M. Q., & Ives, V. (1950). Rorschach “card-pull” in a normal adolescent population. Journal of Projective Techniques, 14, 107-133.

34.

Rapaport, D., Gill, M., & Schafer, R. (1946). Diagnostic psychological testing: The theory, statistical evaluation, and diagnostic application of a battery of tests: Volume II. Chicago: Year Book.

35.

Roy, M. S., Podgor, M. J., Collier, B., & Gunkel, R. D. (1991). Color vision and age in a normal North American population. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 229, 139-44.

36.

Spaniol, J., Voss, A., Bowen, H. J., & Grady. C. L. (2011). Motivational incentives modulate age differences in visual perception. Psychology and Aging. DOI: 10.1037/a0023297.

37.

Tamkin, A. S., & Hyer, L. (1983). Defensiveness in psychiatric elderly persons: Fact or fiction. Psychological Reports, 52, 455-458.

38.

Ulrich, R., & Miller, J. (2004). Threshold estimation in two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) tasks: The Spearman-Kärber method. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 517-533.

39.

Viglione, D. J., & Rivera, B. (2003). Assessing personality and psychopathology with projective tests. In J. R. Graham & J. A. Naglieri (Eds.), Comprehensive Handbook of Psychology: Assessment Psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 531-553). New York: Wiley.

한국심리학회지: 일반

논문 투고 OA 정책