바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1229-067X

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.33 No.3
Citation Share

숨김 정보 검사에서 유무죄 및 범죄정보 인식에 따른 심리생리반응 차이

Differences in psychological response among guilty, informed innocent and innocent group of participants in a concealed information test

한국심리학회지: 일반 / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2014, v.33 no.3, pp.627-646
홍현기 (국립과학수사연구원)
현명호 (중앙대학교)
진민진 (중앙대학교)
홍유나 (중앙대학교)
김희송 (국립과학수사연구원)
지형기 (국립과학수사연구원)
김기평 (국립과학수사연구원)
홍현기, 현명호, 진민진, 홍유나, 김희송, 지형기, & 김기평. (2014). 숨김 정보 검사에서 유무죄 및 범죄정보 인식에 따른 심리생리반응 차이. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 33(3), 627-646.
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

초록

본 연구는 숨김 정보 검사(Concealed Information Test)에서 유죄 집단, 범죄 정보에 노출된 무죄 집단, 범죄 정보를 모르는 무죄 집단 간 심리생리반응의 차이를 검증하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 실험에 참여하기로 동의한 67명의 대학생을 대상으로 유죄 집단 23명, 범죄 정보에 노출된 무죄 집단 21명, 정보에 노출되지 않은 집단 23명으로 할당하였다. 유죄 집단에게는 가상범죄를 수행하게 하였고, 범죄 정보에 노출된 무죄 집단에게는 가상범죄를 저지르지 않았지만 실험자가 범죄 관련 정보를 대상자에게 알려주었으며, 범죄 정보에 노출되지 않은 집단의 경우 가상범죄를 저지르지도 않았고 범죄 관련 정보도 모르는 조건이었다. 과제 수행 후 숨김 정보 검사를 이용한 심리생리검사를 실시하였고, 호흡 선 길이, 피부전도반응의 길이, 심박률을 측정한 후 Z점수로 변환하여 분석하였다. 분석 결과 호흡 선의 길이는 유죄 집단이 두 무죄집단보다 짧았으며, 두 무죄 집단 간에는 차이가 유의하지 않았다. 또한 피부전도반응 길이의 경우, 유죄 집단이 두 무죄 집단보다 유의하게 높았으며, 두 무죄 집단 간에는 차이가 유의하지 않은 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로 심박률의 경우 세 집단 간 차이가 유의하지 않았다. 본 연구 결과는 범죄 정보에 노출된 무죄 집단이라 하더라도 범죄를 저지른 유죄 집단과 심리생리반응 패턴이 유의하게 차이가 있음을 의미한다.

keywords
숨김 정보 검사, 심리생리검사, 호흡선 길이, 피부 전도도, 심박률, 범죄 정보에 노출된 무죄 집단, Concealed Information Test, Respiration, Electrodermal Activity, heart rate, informed innocent group

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the differences in psychological responses among guilty group, informed innocent group, and innocent group in the CIT(Concealed Information Test) analysis. There were 23 individuals in the guilty group, 21 individuals in the informed innocent group, and 23 individuals in the innocent group. A mock crime task was given to the guilty group. The informed innocent group did not carry out the mock crime but was informed of the crime-relevant information. The innocent group did not carry out the crime and was not informed of the crime-relevant information. After carrying out the task, the CIT was administered along measuring respiratory signal, electrodermal activity and heart rate responses. The results showed that the Z score of respiration was significantly lower for the guilty group than the innocent group and the informed innocent group. Both innocent groups, regardless of the availability of the crime-relevant information, were not significantly different. Next, for the skin conductance, the guilty group showed higher Z score than the innocent group and the informed innocent. Both innocent groups were not significantly different. In case of heart rate, there were no signigicant differences among the groups. The limitations and the implications of this study are discussed in this article.

keywords
숨김 정보 검사, 심리생리검사, 호흡선 길이, 피부 전도도, 심박률, 범죄 정보에 노출된 무죄 집단, Concealed Information Test, Respiration, Electrodermal Activity, heart rate, informed innocent group

참고문헌

1.

홍현기, 김희송, 지형기 (2013). CIT 검사 시 관련 질문과 무관련 질문 간의 심리생리반응의 차이 연구. 한국법과학회지, 15(1), 36-41.

2.

Ben-Shakhar, G., & Elaad, E. (2002). Effects of questions’ repetition and variation on the efficiency of the guilty knowledge test: a reexamination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 972-977.

3.

Ben-Shakhar, G., & Furedy, J. J. (1990). Theories and applications in the detection of deception. New York., Springer-Verlag.

4.

Ben-Shakhar, G., Gronau, N., & Elaad, E.. (1999). Leakage of relevant information to innocent examinees in the GKT: An attempt to reduce false positive outcomes by introducing target stimuli. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 651- 660.

5.

Bradley, M. M. (2009). Natural selective attention: Orienting and emotion, Psychophysiology, 46, 1-11.

6.

Bradley, M. T., & Ainsworth, D. (1984). Alcohol and the psychophysiological detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 21, 63-71.

7.

Bradley, M. T., & Janisse, M. P. (1981). Accuracy demonstrations, threat, and the detection of deception: cardiovascular, electrodermal, and pupillary measures. Psychophysiology, 18, 307- 315.

8.

Bradley, M. T., MacLaren, V. V., & Carle, S. B. (1996). Deception and nondeception in guilty knowledge and guilty actions polygraph tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 153-160.

9.

Bradley, M. T., & Rettinger, J. (1992). Awareness of crime-relevant information and the guilty knowledge test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 55-59.

10.

Bradley, M. T., & Warfield, J. F. (1984). Innocence, information, and the guilty knowledge test in the detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 21, 683-689.

11.

Elaad, E. (2009). Effects of context and state of guilt on the detection of concealed crime information. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 71, 225-234.

12.

Elaad, E. (2010). Effects of perceived reliability and generalization of crime-related information on detection in the concealed information test. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 75, 295- 303.

13.

Elaad, E. (2013). Effects of goal- and task-oriented motivation in the guilty action test. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 88, 82-90.

14.

Elaad, E., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (1989). Effects of motivation and verbal-response type on psychophysiological detection of information. Psychophysiology, 26, 442-451.

15.

Elaad, E., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (2006). Finger pulse waveform length in the detection of concealed information. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 61, 226-234.

16.

Gamer, M. (2010). Does the Guilty Actions Test allow for differentiating guilty participants from informed innocents? A re-examination. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 76, 19- 24.

17.

Gamer, M., Rill, H. G., Vossel, G., & Godert, H. W. (2006). Psychophysiological and vocal measures in the detection of guilty knowledge. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 60, 76- 87.

18.

Gamer, M., Gödert, H.W., Keth, A., Rill, H.-G., & Vossel, G. (2008). Electrodermal and phasic heart rate responses in the Guilty Actions Test: comparing guilty examinees to informed and uninformed innocents. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 69, 61-68.

19.

Graham, F. K. (1979). Distinguishing among orienting, defense, and startle reflexes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

20.

Gronau, N., Ben-Shakhar, G., & Cohen, A. (2005). Behavioral and physiological measures in the detection of concealed information. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 147-158.

21.

Kreibig, S. D., Wilhelm,, F. H., Roth, W. T. & Gross, J. J. (2007). Cardiovascular, electrodermal, and respiratory response patterns to fear- and sadness-inducing films. Psychophysiology, 44, 787-806.

22.

Lang, P. J., Wangelin, B. C., Bradley, M. M., Versance, F., Davenport P. W. & Costa, V. D. (2011). Threat of suffocation and defensive reflex activation, Psychophysiology, 48, 393-396.

23.

Lykken, D. T. (1959). The GSR in the detection of guilt. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 385-388.

24.

Lykken, D. T. (1974). Psychology and the lie detection industry. American Psychologist, 29, 225-239.

25.

Lykken, D. T. (1998). A Tremor in the blood. uses and abuses of the lie detector (2nd ed.). Plenum Trade, New York.

26.

Podlesny, J. A., & Raskin, D. C. (1977). Physiological measures and the detection of deception. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 782-799.

27.

Rosenfeld, J. P., Labkovsky, E., Winograd, M., Lui, M. A., Vandenboom, C., & Chedid, E. (2008). The Complex Trial Protocol (CTP): A new, countermeasure-resistant, accurate P300- based method for detection of concealed information, Psychophysiology, 45, 906-919.

28.

Siddle, D. A., O`Gorman, J. G., & Wood, L. (1979). Effects of electrodermal lability and stimulus significance on electrodermal response amplitude to stimulus change. Psychophysiology, 16, 520-527.

29.

Sokolov, E. N. (1963). Perception and the conditioned reflex. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

30.

Sokolov, E. N. (1969). The modeling properties of the nervous system, New York: Basic Books.

31.

Stekelenburg, J. J., & Van Boxtel, A. (2002). Pericranial muscular, respiratory, and heart rate components of the orienting response, Psychophysiology, 39, 707-722.

32.

Timm, H. W. (1982). Analyzing deception from respiration patterns. Journal of Police Science & Administration, 10, 47-51.

33.

Turpin, G. (1986). Effects of stimulus intensity on autonomic responding: the problem of differentiating orienting and defense reflexes. Psychophysiology 23, 1-14.

34.

Vandenbosch, K., Verschuere, B., Crombez, G. & De Clercq A. (2009). The validity of finger pulse line length for the detection of concealed information. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 71, 118-123.

35.

Verschuere, B., Crombez, G., De Clercq, A., & Koster, E. W. (2004). Autonomic and behavioral responding to concealed information: differentiating defensive and orienting responses. Psychophysiology, 41, 461- 466.

36.

Verschuere, B., Crombez, G., De Clercq, A., & Koster, E. W. (2005). Psychopathic traits and autonomic responding to concealed information in a prison sample. Psychophysiology, 42, 239- 245.

37.

Verschuere, B., Crombez, G., Koster, E. H. W. & Clercq, A. D. (2007). Antisociality, underarousal and the validity of the Concealed Information Polygraph Test. Biological Psychology, 74, 309-318.

38.

Verschuere, B., Crombez, G., Degrootte, T. & Rosseel, Y. (2010). Detecting Concealed Information with Reaction Times: Validity and Comparison with the Polygraph. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 991-1002.

한국심리학회지: 일반

논문 투고 OA 정책