바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

ISSN : 1229-067X

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.33 No.3
Citation Share

Differences in psychological response among guilty, informed innocent and innocent group of participants in a concealed information test

Korean Journal of Psychology: General / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2014, v.33 no.3, pp.627-646







& (2014). Differences in psychological response among guilty, informed innocent and innocent group of participants in a concealed information test. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 33(3), 627-646.
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the differences in psychological responses among guilty group, informed innocent group, and innocent group in the CIT(Concealed Information Test) analysis. There were 23 individuals in the guilty group, 21 individuals in the informed innocent group, and 23 individuals in the innocent group. A mock crime task was given to the guilty group. The informed innocent group did not carry out the mock crime but was informed of the crime-relevant information. The innocent group did not carry out the crime and was not informed of the crime-relevant information. After carrying out the task, the CIT was administered along measuring respiratory signal, electrodermal activity and heart rate responses. The results showed that the Z score of respiration was significantly lower for the guilty group than the innocent group and the informed innocent group. Both innocent groups, regardless of the availability of the crime-relevant information, were not significantly different. Next, for the skin conductance, the guilty group showed higher Z score than the innocent group and the informed innocent. Both innocent groups were not significantly different. In case of heart rate, there were no signigicant differences among the groups. The limitations and the implications of this study are discussed in this article.

keywords
숨김 정보 검사, 심리생리검사, 호흡선 길이, 피부 전도도, 심박률, 범죄 정보에 노출된 무죄 집단, Concealed Information Test, Respiration, Electrodermal Activity, heart rate, informed innocent group

Reference

1.

홍현기, 김희송, 지형기 (2013). CIT 검사 시 관련 질문과 무관련 질문 간의 심리생리반응의 차이 연구. 한국법과학회지, 15(1), 36-41.

2.

Ben-Shakhar, G., & Elaad, E. (2002). Effects of questions’ repetition and variation on the efficiency of the guilty knowledge test: a reexamination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 972-977.

3.

Ben-Shakhar, G., & Furedy, J. J. (1990). Theories and applications in the detection of deception. New York., Springer-Verlag.

4.

Ben-Shakhar, G., Gronau, N., & Elaad, E.. (1999). Leakage of relevant information to innocent examinees in the GKT: An attempt to reduce false positive outcomes by introducing target stimuli. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 651- 660.

5.

Bradley, M. M. (2009). Natural selective attention: Orienting and emotion, Psychophysiology, 46, 1-11.

6.

Bradley, M. T., & Ainsworth, D. (1984). Alcohol and the psychophysiological detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 21, 63-71.

7.

Bradley, M. T., & Janisse, M. P. (1981). Accuracy demonstrations, threat, and the detection of deception: cardiovascular, electrodermal, and pupillary measures. Psychophysiology, 18, 307- 315.

8.

Bradley, M. T., MacLaren, V. V., & Carle, S. B. (1996). Deception and nondeception in guilty knowledge and guilty actions polygraph tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 153-160.

9.

Bradley, M. T., & Rettinger, J. (1992). Awareness of crime-relevant information and the guilty knowledge test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 55-59.

10.

Bradley, M. T., & Warfield, J. F. (1984). Innocence, information, and the guilty knowledge test in the detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 21, 683-689.

11.

Elaad, E. (2009). Effects of context and state of guilt on the detection of concealed crime information. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 71, 225-234.

12.

Elaad, E. (2010). Effects of perceived reliability and generalization of crime-related information on detection in the concealed information test. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 75, 295- 303.

13.

Elaad, E. (2013). Effects of goal- and task-oriented motivation in the guilty action test. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 88, 82-90.

14.

Elaad, E., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (1989). Effects of motivation and verbal-response type on psychophysiological detection of information. Psychophysiology, 26, 442-451.

15.

Elaad, E., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (2006). Finger pulse waveform length in the detection of concealed information. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 61, 226-234.

16.

Gamer, M. (2010). Does the Guilty Actions Test allow for differentiating guilty participants from informed innocents? A re-examination. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 76, 19- 24.

17.

Gamer, M., Rill, H. G., Vossel, G., & Godert, H. W. (2006). Psychophysiological and vocal measures in the detection of guilty knowledge. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 60, 76- 87.

18.

Gamer, M., Gödert, H.W., Keth, A., Rill, H.-G., & Vossel, G. (2008). Electrodermal and phasic heart rate responses in the Guilty Actions Test: comparing guilty examinees to informed and uninformed innocents. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 69, 61-68.

19.

Graham, F. K. (1979). Distinguishing among orienting, defense, and startle reflexes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

20.

Gronau, N., Ben-Shakhar, G., & Cohen, A. (2005). Behavioral and physiological measures in the detection of concealed information. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 147-158.

21.

Kreibig, S. D., Wilhelm,, F. H., Roth, W. T. & Gross, J. J. (2007). Cardiovascular, electrodermal, and respiratory response patterns to fear- and sadness-inducing films. Psychophysiology, 44, 787-806.

22.

Lang, P. J., Wangelin, B. C., Bradley, M. M., Versance, F., Davenport P. W. & Costa, V. D. (2011). Threat of suffocation and defensive reflex activation, Psychophysiology, 48, 393-396.

23.

Lykken, D. T. (1959). The GSR in the detection of guilt. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 385-388.

24.

Lykken, D. T. (1974). Psychology and the lie detection industry. American Psychologist, 29, 225-239.

25.

Lykken, D. T. (1998). A Tremor in the blood. uses and abuses of the lie detector (2nd ed.). Plenum Trade, New York.

26.

Podlesny, J. A., & Raskin, D. C. (1977). Physiological measures and the detection of deception. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 782-799.

27.

Rosenfeld, J. P., Labkovsky, E., Winograd, M., Lui, M. A., Vandenboom, C., & Chedid, E. (2008). The Complex Trial Protocol (CTP): A new, countermeasure-resistant, accurate P300- based method for detection of concealed information, Psychophysiology, 45, 906-919.

28.

Siddle, D. A., O`Gorman, J. G., & Wood, L. (1979). Effects of electrodermal lability and stimulus significance on electrodermal response amplitude to stimulus change. Psychophysiology, 16, 520-527.

29.

Sokolov, E. N. (1963). Perception and the conditioned reflex. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

30.

Sokolov, E. N. (1969). The modeling properties of the nervous system, New York: Basic Books.

31.

Stekelenburg, J. J., & Van Boxtel, A. (2002). Pericranial muscular, respiratory, and heart rate components of the orienting response, Psychophysiology, 39, 707-722.

32.

Timm, H. W. (1982). Analyzing deception from respiration patterns. Journal of Police Science & Administration, 10, 47-51.

33.

Turpin, G. (1986). Effects of stimulus intensity on autonomic responding: the problem of differentiating orienting and defense reflexes. Psychophysiology 23, 1-14.

34.

Vandenbosch, K., Verschuere, B., Crombez, G. & De Clercq A. (2009). The validity of finger pulse line length for the detection of concealed information. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 71, 118-123.

35.

Verschuere, B., Crombez, G., De Clercq, A., & Koster, E. W. (2004). Autonomic and behavioral responding to concealed information: differentiating defensive and orienting responses. Psychophysiology, 41, 461- 466.

36.

Verschuere, B., Crombez, G., De Clercq, A., & Koster, E. W. (2005). Psychopathic traits and autonomic responding to concealed information in a prison sample. Psychophysiology, 42, 239- 245.

37.

Verschuere, B., Crombez, G., Koster, E. H. W. & Clercq, A. D. (2007). Antisociality, underarousal and the validity of the Concealed Information Polygraph Test. Biological Psychology, 74, 309-318.

38.

Verschuere, B., Crombez, G., Degrootte, T. & Rosseel, Y. (2010). Detecting Concealed Information with Reaction Times: Validity and Comparison with the Polygraph. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 991-1002.

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

e-Submission OA Policy