바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

ISSN : 1229-067X

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.34 No.1

Citation Share

Induced Bodily Actions and Changes in Implicit Attitude toward the elderly and the young: Incorporating mouse tracking measures into implicit association test

Korean Journal of Psychology: General / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2015, v.34 no.1, pp.205-223


& (2015). Induced Bodily Actions and Changes in Implicit Attitude toward the elderly and the young: Incorporating mouse tracking measures into implicit association test. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 34(1), 205-223.

Abstract

The mouse tracking method can measure not only end products, but also realtime course characteristics of the cognitive process. We tested whether body movements might cause changes in relevant social attitude (i.e., increasing vs. decreasing prejudice against the elderly). In study, an action task (slow vs. fast) was conducted to trigger related implicit attitudes. A mouse tracking method was used to assess mouse trajectory differences between compatible (old + negative, young + positive) and incompatible (old + positive, young + negative) trials. According to the results, implicit prejudice against seniors in the ‘slow’ group was lower than that of the ‘fast’ group. Embodied cognition was discussed regarding cognitive processing style and regulation of social prejudice.

keywords
embodied cognition, stereotype, mouse tracking method, 체화된 인지, 고정관념, 마우스추적기법

Reference

1.

김지연, 김민희, 민경환 (2012). 한국판 노인차별주의 척도의 타당화: 대학생 표본을 대상으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 26, 89-106.

2.

박선진, 이순철. (2009). 서두름 행동이 과제수행의 속도와 정확도에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직. 22, 469-485.

3.

이미순, 양위주 (2009). 슬로우 시티 운동. 동북아문화연구, 20, 283-297.

4.

이정모 (2010). ‘체화된 인지(Embodied Cognition)’ 접근과 학문간 융합-인지과학 새 패러다임과 철학의 연결이 주는 시사. 철학사상, 38, 27-66.

5.

이현지, 방희정 (2012). 노인에 대한 명시적 및 암묵적 태도: 대학생 및 노인을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 18, 191-213.

6.

이영숙, 박경란 (2003). 대학생이 인지하는 남,녀 노인의 고정관념 비교연구. 노인복지연구, 19, 83-109.

7.

한병철 (2012). 피로사회. 문학과 지성사.

8.

Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of psychology, 59, 617-645.

9.

Chandler, J., & Schwarz, N. (2009). How extending your middle finger affects your perception of others: Learned movements influence concept accessibility. Journal of personality and Social psychology, 45, 123-128.

10.

Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of personality and Social psychology, 56, 5-18.

11.

Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N. (2009). Motions of the hand expose the partial and parallel activation od stereotypes. Psychological Science, 20, 1183-1188.

12.

Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N. (2010). MouseTracker: Software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse- tracking method. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 226-241.

13.

Freeman, J. B., Dale, R., & Farmer, T. A. (2011). Hand in motion reveals mind in motion. Frontiers in psychology, 2, 59.

14.

Förster, J., Friedman, R., Butterbach, E. M., & Sassenberg, K. (2005). Automatic effects of deviancy cues on creative cognition. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 345-360.

15.

Gilbert, D. T, & Hixon, J. G. (1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of personality and Social psychology, 60, 509-517.

16.

Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of personality and Social psychology, 74, 1464-1480.

17.

Greenwald, A. C., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of personality and Social psychology, 85, 197-216.

18.

Greenward, A. G., Poelman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17-41.

19.

Grouzet, F. M. E., Kasser, T., Ahuvia, A., Dols, J. M. F., Kim, Y., Lau, S., et al. (2005). The Structure of goal contents across 15 cultures. Journal of personality and Social psychology, 89, 800-816.

20.

Hart, W., & Albarracin, D. (2009). The effects of chronic motivation and achievement primes on the activation of achievement and fun goals. Journal of personality and Social psychology, 97, 1129-1141.

21.

Koop, G. J. (2013). An assessment of the temporal dynamics of moral decisions. Judgement and Decision Making, 8, 527-539.

22.

Landau, M., Meier, B., & Lucas, K. (2010). A metaphor-enriched social cognition. psychological Bulletin, 136, 1045-1067.

23.

Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Wiping the Slate Clean: psychological Consequences of physical Cleansing. Current Directions in psychological Science, 20, 307-311.

24.

Markman, A. B., & Brendl, C. M. (2005). Constraining theories of embodied Cognition. psychological Science, 16, 6-10.

25.

Meier, B. p., Schnall, S., Schwarz, N., & Bargh, J. A. (2012). Embodiment in Social psychology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 705-716.

26.

Rosencrantz, H. A., & McNevin, T. E. (1969). A factor analysis of attitudes toward the aged. The Gerontologist, 9, 55-59.

27.

Sassenberg, K., & Moskowitz, G. (2005). Don't stereotype, think different! Overcoming automatic stereotype activation by mindset priming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 506-514.

28.

Slepian, M. L., & Ambady, N. (2012). Fluid movement and creativity. Journal of Experimental psychology: General, 141, 625-629.

29.

Slepian, M. L., Weisbuch, M., Pauker, K., Bastian, B., & Ambady, N. (2014). Fluid movement and fluid social cognition: Bodily movement influences essentialist thought. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 111-120.

30.

Schnall, S., Benton, J., & Harvey, S. (2008). With a clean conscience: Cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments. psychological Science, 19, 1219-1222.

31.

Schneider, W., Eschmann, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-prime reference guide. pittsburgh, pA: psychology Software Tools.

32.

Schubert, T. W., & Semin, G. R. (2009). Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology. European Journal of Social psychology, 39, 1135-1141.

33.

Thomas, L. E., & Lleras, A. (2009). Swinging into thought: Directed movement guides insight in problem solving. psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 719-723.

34.

Warburton, E. C., Wilson, M., Lynch, M., & Cuykendall, S. (2013). The cognitive benefits of movement reduction: Evidence from dance marking. psychological Science, in press.

35.

Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science, 322, 606-607.

36.

Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625-636.

37.

Yu, Z., Wang, F., Wang, D., & Bastin, M. (2012). Beyond reaction times: Incorporating mouse-tracking measures into the implicit association test to examine its underlying process. Social Cognition, 30, 289-306.

38.

Zhong, C. B., & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313, 1451-1452.

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

e-Submission OA Policy