바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

ISSN : 1229-067X

Article Contents

Prev
e-Submission

Vol.35 No.1

Citation Share

Assessing Mediated Moderation and Moderated Mediation: Guidelines and Empirical Illustration

Korean Journal of Psychology: General / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2016, v.35 no.1, pp.257-282
https://doi.org/10.22257/kjp.2016.03.35.1.257


& (2016). Assessing Mediated Moderation and Moderated Mediation: Guidelines and Empirical Illustration. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 35(1), 257-282, https://doi.org/10.22257/kjp.2016.03.35.1.257

Abstract

The goals of this article are to (1) describe differences between mediated moderation and moderated mediation; (2) provide conceptual overview of how to examine each type of integration between mediation and moderation, including analytical strategy and interpretation of numerical results; (3) demonstrate how to analyze each using real data sets. The authors focus on the use of multiple regression because it remains the most commonly used method of assessing mediation and moderation in behavioral research. We hope that this discussion will mitigate confusion over the differences between mediated moderation and moderated mediation and thus can enhance the frequency of tests of mediated moderation and moderated mediation in the literature.

keywords
매개효과, 조절효과, 매개된 조절효과, 조절된 매개효과, 회귀분석, mediation, moderation, mediated moderation, moderated mediation, regression model

Reference

1.

김기준, 송해엽, 정재민 (2015). 고익연계마케팅의 적합성과 지속성이 브랜드 페이지가입 및 추천의도에 미치는 영향. 경영학연구, 44(1), 281-303.

2.

김인경, 홍혜영 (2013). 복합외상 경험자들의외상관련 정서와 용서의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 32(2), 453-491.

3.

김은혜, 서수균 (2013). 내현적 자기애성향과적대감 사이에서 부적응적 대처의 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 32(3), 533-548.

4.

박지현, 방희정 (2013). 여대생의 사회지향성이폭식행동에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지:일반, 32(3), 653-674.

5.

이흥표 (2014). 신경증 외래 환자 집단에서 사회적 배척과 자살 사고와의 관계 및 우울의 매개효과검증. 한국심리학회지: 일반,33(1), 1-24.

6.

조영일, 김지현, 한우리, 조유정 (2015). 임상연구에서 조절효과 및 매개효과의 비교및 통합. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 34(4),1113-1131.

7.

조영재, 이동훈 (2013). 남자대학생의 내현적자기애성향이 대인관계문제에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 32(4), 845-866.

8.

차문경, 이유재 (2014). 노스탤지어의 유형이기부의도에 미치는 영향: 자기향상감과사회적 책임감을 통한 조절초점의 매개된조절효과를 중심으로. 마케팅연구, 29(5),23-49.

9.

채서영, 임성문 (2014). 자기애와 강박적 구매의 관계: 물질주의와 의사결정유능성의조절된 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 15(1), 123-144.

10.

홍주현, 심은정 (2013). 정서인식의 명확성과청소년의 정신건강. 한국심리학회지: 일반,32(1), 195-212

11.

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

12.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 51, 1173- 1182.

13.

Brown, S. P., Westbrook, R. A., & Challagalla, G. (2005). Good cope, bad cope: Adaptive and Maladaptive coping strategies following a critical negative work event. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 792-798.

14.

Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

15.

Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310-357.

16.

Cole, M., Bruch, H., & Walter, F. (2008). Affective mechanisms linking dysfunctional behavior to performance in work teams: A moderated mediation study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 945-958.

17.

Colquitt, J. A., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2007). Trends in theory building and theory testing: A five-decade study of the “Academy of Management Journal”. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1281-1303.

18.

Di Muro, F., & Noseworthy, T. J. (2013). Money isn’t everything, but it helps if it doesn’t look used: How the physical appearance of money influences spending. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(6), 1330-1342.

19.

Dijkmans, C., Kerkhof, P., & Beukeboom, C. J. (2015). A stage to engage: Social media use and corporate reputation. Tourism Management, 47, 58-67.

20.

Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: a general analytic framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1-22.

21.

Fairchild, A. J. &　MacKinnon, D. P.　(2009). A general model for testing mediation and moderation effects. Prevention Science, 10(2), 87-99.

22.

Hayes, A. F. (2012). Process: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. White paper, [http://www.afhayes. com/public/proces s2012.pdf].

23.

Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.

24.

James, L. R., & Brett, J. M. (1984). Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 307-321.

25.

James, L. R., Mulaik S. A., & Brett, J. M. (2006). A tale of two methods. Organizational Research Methods, 9, 233-244.

26.

MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams., J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99-128.

27.

Morgan-Lopez A. A., MacKinnon D. P. (2006). Demonstration and evaluation of a method for assessing mediated moderation. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 77-87.

28.

Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852-863.

29.

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731.

30.

Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Assessing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185-227.

31.

Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445.

32.

Sobel. M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290-312.

33.

Sutton, R. I., &　Staw, B. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 371-384.

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

e-Submission OA Policy