Verification of validity of self-report related to sexual attitudes: Based on correlation between implicit attitudes and self-report

조환희, 강지윤, 김혜진, 마주연, & HWANGSAMUEL, S. H. (2019). 성과 관련된 자기보고의 타당성 검증: 암묵적 태도와 자기보고 간의 상관을 토대로. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 38(2), 127-146, https://doi.org/10.22257/kjp.2019.6.38.2.127

복사

다운로드 수
조회수

PDF 다운로드

초록

사회과학 영역에서 사람들의 태도를 측정하기 위해 자기보고가 흔히 사용된다. 하지만 사람들은 종종 실제 태도를 드러내지 않는다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 성과 같은 민감한 영역에서 자기보고의 타당성을 검증하고자 행동과제로 측정된 암묵적 태도와 자기보고로 측정된 명시적 태도 사이의 상관을 비교하였다. 이를 위해 대학생 161명을 대상으로 성과 관련된 척도들을 각각 자기와 ‘일반적인 20대 대학생’에 대해 평정하게 하였다. 아울러 동일한 대상에게 암묵적 연합검사(IAT)를 실시하여 암묵적 사교적 성애를 측정하였다. 조건 간 t-검증을 실시한 결과, 자기평가가 타인평가보다 쾌락적 성, 부도덕적 성관념, 도구적 성, 성충동, 사교적 성애에서 유의미하게 낮은 점수를 보인 반면, 성 책임감은 유의미하게 높은 점수를 보였다. 또한 동일 변인을 각각 ‘자기’와 ‘타인’에 대해 평정할 때, 두 평가 간 대응되는 모든 변인에서 유의미한 정적 상관을 얻었다. 또한 IAT가 타인평가의 쾌락적 성, 사교적 성애와 부적 상관이 있었다. 이러한 결과는 성과 관련된 척도에서 사회적 바람직성이 유의미하게 작용한다는 점을 암시하며, 민감한 주제를 자기보고로 연구할 경우에는 그 결과의 해석에 신중해야함을 시사한다.

keywords: Self-Report, Social desirability, Response bias, Sociosexuality, Implicit Association Test, 자기보고, 사회적 바람직성, 반응왜곡, 사교적 성애, 암묵적 연합검사

Abstract

Self-report is often used to measure people's attitudes in the field of social science. However, people often do not reveal their true attitudes. Therefore, this study aims to verify the validity of self-report related to sexual attitudes based on correlation between implicit attitudes and self-report. For this purpose, 161 college students completed measures related to sexual attitudes (i.e. voluptuous sex, immoral sexual idea) about themselves and general college students. In addition, the Implicit Association Test(IAT) was conducted to measure their implicit sociosexuality. The results of the pairwise t-test showed that subjects rated themselves as having significantly lower voluptuous sex, immoral sexual idea, instrumental sex, sexual impulsivity, and sociosexuality, but higher sexual responsibility, compared with others. Also, all identical variables about the ‘self’ and ‘others’ were significantly correlated. Finally, negative correlations between the results of IAT and the report concerning ‘others’ on voluptuous sex and sociosexuality were obtained. These results implied that social desirability influences people’s responses on variables related to sexual attitudes. Thus, our study suggests self-report studies on sensitive subjects like sexual attitude warrant special caution in the interpretation of their results.

keywords: Self-Report, Social desirability, Response bias, Sociosexuality, Implicit Association Test, 자기보고, 사회적 바람직성, 반응왜곡, 사교적 성애, 암묵적 연합검사

참고문헌

송수호 (2016). 대학생의 성태도와 성행동: 1995년, 2001년, 2016년 비교연구. 인천대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

안지인, 고영건 (2014). 성인의 원하지 않는 성행동 응낙과 애착이 이성관계 만족에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 19(3), 233-251.

이유선, 최준호, 오대영, 이장한 (2009). 성범죄자의 외현적 및 암묵적 태도 간의 관계연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 28(3), 709-721.

이희영 (2007). 한․중․일 청소년의 성지식, 성태도, 성행동 및 성교육 비교분석. 강원대학교 일반대학원 박사학위논문.

전경숙, 이효영, 이선자 (2004). 대학생의 성지식, 태도, 행동실태 및 성교육 효과에 관한 연구. 보건교육건강증진학회지, 21(1), 45-68.

최서진 (2013). 가상적인 인물의 성행동에 대한 남녀의 지각 차이. 전남대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

최인숙 (2009). Hendrick 다차원적 성태도 척도의 타당화. 숙명여자대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

한건환, 민윤기 (2017). 일반인과 성범죄자의BIAT 반응특성비교. 사회과학연구, 28(2), 155-171.

Alexander, M. G., & Fisher, T. D. (2003). Truth and consequences: Using the bogus pipeline to examine sex differences in self‐reported sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 40(1), 27-35.

10.

Barkoukis, V., Lazuras, L., & Tsorbatzoudis, H. (2015). The psychology of doping in sport. New York: Routledge.

11.

Bailey, J. M., Kirk, K. M., Zhu, G., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Do individual differences in sociosexuality represent genetic or environmentally contingent strategies? Evidence from the Australian twin registry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(3), 537-545.

12.

Banse, R., Seise, J., & Zerbes, N. (2001). Implicit attitudes towards homosexuality: Reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48(2), 145-160.

13.

Brody, S. (1995). Patients misrepresenting their risk factors for AIDS. International Journal of STD & AIDS, 6(6), 392-398.

14.

Chung, J., & Monroe, G. S. (2003). Exploring social desirability bias. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(4), 291-302.

15.

DiFranceisco, W., McAuliffe, T. L., & Sikkema, K. J. (1998). Influences of survey instrument format and social desirability on the reliability of self-reported high risk sexual behavior. AIDS and Behavior, 2(4), 329-337.

16.

Dovidio, J. F., & Fazio, R. H. (1992). New technologies for the direct and indirect assessment of attitudes. In J. M. Tanur (Ed.), Questions about questions: Inquiries into the cognitive bases of surveys (pp. 204-237). New York: Russel Sage Foundation.

17.

Dudley, N. M., McFarland, L. A., Goodman, S. A., Hunt, S. T., & Sydell, E. J. (2005). Racial differences in socially desirable responding in selection contexts: Magnitude and consequences. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85(1), 50-64.

18.

Eysenck, H. J. (1976). Sex and personality. London:Open Books.

19.

Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247-282). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

20.

Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327.

21.

Ferrando, P. J., Condon, L., & Chico, E. (2004). The convergent validity of acquiescence: an empirical study relating balanced scales and separate acquiescence scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(7), 1331-1340.

22.

Fisher, R. J. (1993). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(2), 303-315.

23.

Fisher, R. J., & Tellis, G. J. (1998). Removing social desirability bias with indirect questioning: Is the cure worse than the disease? Advances in Consumer Research, 15(25), 563-567.

24.

Ganster, D. C., Hennessey, H. W., & Luthans, F. (1983). Social desirability response effects:Three alternative models. Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 321-331.

25.

Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., & Mellott, D. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109(1), 3-25.

26.

Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464-1480.

27.

Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197-216.

28.

Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 17-41.

29.

Hendrick, S., & Hendrick, C. (1987). Multidimensionality of sexual attitudes. Journal of Sex Research, 23(4), 502-526.

30.

Hendrick, S., Hendrick, C., Slapion-Foote, M. J., & Foote, F. H. (1985). Gender differences in sexual attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6), 1630-1642.

31.

Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(10), 1369-1385.

32.

Karpinski, A., & Hilton, J. L. (2001). Attitudes and the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 774-788.

33.

Katz, D., & Allport, F. H. (1931). Students’attitudes. Syracuse, NY: Craftsman Press.

34.

Keillor, B., Owens, D., & Pettijohn, C. (2001). A cross-cultural/cross-national study of influencing factors and socially desirable response biases. International Journal of Market Research, 43(1), 63-84.

35.

Kelly, N., Harpel, T., Fontes, A., Walters, C., & Murphy, J. (2017). An Examination of Social Desirability Bias in Measures of College Students' Financial Behavior. College Student Journal, 51(1), 115-128.

36.

Kim, S. H., & Kim, S. (2016). National Culture and Social Desirability Bias in Measuring Public Service Motivation. Administration &Society, 48(4), 444-476.

37.

Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Sloan, S. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: Saunders.

38.

Krumpal, I. (2013). Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: A literature review. Quality & Quantity, 47(4), 2025-2047.

39.

Madden, G. J., Petry, N. M., Badger, G. J., & Bickel, W. K. (1997). Impulsive and self-control choices in opioid-dependent patients and non-drug-using control patients:Drug and monetary rewards. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 5(3), 256-262.

40.

Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C. (2005). The Sexual Double Standard: Fact or Fiction? Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 52(3-4), 175-186.

41.

Nosek, B. A., & Hansen, J. J. (2008). The associations in our heads belong to us:Searching for attitudes and knowledge in implicit evaluation. Cognition & Emotion, 22(4), 553-594.

42.

Paulhus, D. L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In H. I. Braun, D. N. Jackson, & D. E. Wiley (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (pp.49–69). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

43.

Paulhus, D. L., & John, O. P. (1998). Egoistic and moralistic biases in self‐perception: The interplay of self‐deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality, 66(6), 1025-1060.

44.

Penke, L., Eichstaedt, J., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2006). Single-attribute implicit association tests (SA-IAT) for the assessment of unipolar constructs. Experimental Psychology, 53(4), 283-291.

45.

Reynolds, B., Richards, J. B., Horn, K., & Karraker, K. (2004). Delay discounting and probability discounting as related to cigarette smoking status in adults. Behavioural Processes, 65(1), 35-42.

46.

Richards, J. B., Zhang, L., Mitchell, S. H., & Wit, H. (1999). Delay or probability discounting in a model of impulsive behavior:effect of alcohol. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 71(2), 121-143.

47.

Robertson, D. H., & Joselyn, R. W. (1974). Projective techniques in research. Journal of Advertising Research, 14, 27-31.

48.

Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(2), 247-275.

49.

Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality:evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(6), 870-883.

50.

Slabbinck, H., & Kenhove, P. V. (2010). Social desirability and indirect questioning: New insights from the Implicit Association Test and the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. Advances in Consumer Research, 37, 904-905.

51.

Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T. (2007). Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychological Bulletin, 133(5), 859-883.

바로가기메뉴

논문 상세

Vol.38 No.2

성과 관련된 자기보고의 타당성 검증: 암묵적 태도와 자기보고 간의 상관을 토대로

Verification of validity of self-report related to sexual attitudes: Based on correlation between implicit attitudes and self-report

초록

Abstract

참고문헌

한국심리학회지: 일반