ISSN : 1229-067X
短期記憶의 容鏺을 決定짓는 心理的 機制들로서 暗誦, 略昘化, 体制化 및 持裱등이 捉起되어 왔다. 이 機制들을 둘러 싼 爭點들을 解決키 위해 두 實験들이 遂行되었다. 黄験 I은 被験者의 年令, 知能과 刺钱提示速度를 操作하여 그들의 數字 短期記憶의 容缺을 測定하였다. 年令과 捉尔速度問에는 有意한 相互作用이 있었으나, 知能과 提示速度問에는 그렇지 못하였다. 이 結果는 知能가 年令이 다른 機制들을 通해 短期記憶의 容飼을 增加지키는 것으로 解釋되며, 特이 年令은 略昘化의 加速化를 通해 容墩을 增加시키는 것으로 보인다. 提示速度에 関係없이 初頭效果기 觀察되어 暗誦이 容鼌의 決定者로서 疑問视되었다. 實験 II는 實験 I이 取扱한 變因 以外에 單甜剌戟를 問의 範崎関聯度를 操作하여 短期記憶 容儀의 決定機制들을 考察하였다. 變因間의 相互作用의 形態는 年令은 略昘化, 知能은 体制化를 通해 容袋을 增加시킴이 드러났다. 投小速度에 相開없이 觀察된 初頭效果는 暗涌이 容界을 決定하는 機制가 아님을 나타내었다. 實験 II 또한 知能과 範疇関聯度, 그리고 知能과 群集化의 範囲問의 相互作用을 通해 情報의 持續이 그 体制匕에 匕有될 可能性을 보여 주었다.
Four mechanisms have been proposed to explain a developmental increase in short-term memory (STM) capacity: Rehearsal, encoding, organization, and persistence of memory trace. Two experiments were designed to test these mechanisms. Experiment I dealt with three factors, subjects' age, intelligence, and presentation time of stimuli, in a digit STM task. A significant interaction effect was observed between age and presentation time, but not between intelligence and presentation time. These findings suggest that intelligence and age of the subject affect the STM capacity via different mechanisms. In particular, age influences the STM capacity through speeding up encoding operation. Primacy effect was obtained, regardless of age, intelligence, and presentation time, suggesting that rehearsal is not a major determinant of the increase in STM capacity. Experment II further included the manipulation of categorical relatedness of words in a stimulus list. It was found that age affects encoding speed, whereas intelligence influences organization process. Rehearsal is again rejected on the ground that primacy effect was obtained in all conditions. Experiment II also revealed signicant interactions between presentation time and clustering size and between intelligence and clustering size at retrieval. These findings suggest that persistence of memory trace depends to a large extent on organization of items at input. Hence, three out of four mechanisms are proved to be major determinants of the STM capacity. These findings call for shift to a multi-process view of the development of the STM capacity.