바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

  • KOREAN
  • P-ISSN1229-067X
  • E-ISSN2734-1127
  • KCI

Sex and Culture Differences in Romantic Jealousy: Korean and U.S. University Students

Korean Journal of Psychology: General / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2006, v.25 no.2, pp.143-155


Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to examine the sex and culture differences in jealousy in romantic relationship. In this study, the assumption that men's jealousy is hypothesized to be particularly concerned with mate's sexual infidelity, whereas women's jealousy is hypothesized to be particularly concerned with mate's emotional infidelity based on the Evolved Jealousy Mechanism (EJM) perspective was proposed. We hypothesized that not only distinctive feature of the sex-specific evolved jealousy mechanism across the culture was replicated, but also the magnitude of the sex differences varies somewhat across cultures was predicted. To test this purpose, 221 university students in Korea and U.S.A were asked to complete the questionnaires and two-way ANOVAs were used to test the data. Results showed that the sex differences in jealousy were robust across these cultures, providing support for the EJM. An interaction between sex and culture as well as main effects for both sex and culture in jealousy and distress for sexual infidelity were revealed. The magnitude of the sex differences varied in large for the United States but small for Koreans. Accordingly, As the men were belonging to the United States at the same time as indicated greater jealousy, and distress to a partner's sexual infidelity. These results might used to understand the sex and culture differences in jealousy in romantic relationship and other culture factors account for the differences should be discussed in future research.

keywords
jealousy, sex differences, culture differences, sexual infidelity, emotional infidelity, jealousy, sex differences, culture differences, sexual infidelity, emotional infidelity, 질투, 성차, 문화차, 성적 부정, 정서적 부정

Reference

1.

(1995) 대학생의 사랑에 대한 태도와 성의식 ,

2.

(2004) 남자의 질투와 여자의 질투 연인관계에서의 질투의 성차,

3.

(1995) 가족심리학-가족관계의 발달, 박영사

4.

(1989) Sex differences in human mate preference:Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures,

5.

(1992) Sex differences in jealousy,

6.

(1995) Evolutionary psychology:A new paradigm for psychological science,

7.

(2000) The dangerous passion: Why jealousy is as necessary as love and sex, Free Press

8.

(1996) Sex differences in evolutionary and culture perspective: Tests from Netherland, Germany, and the United States,

9.

(1991) The psychology of jealousy and envy,

10.

(1997) Jealousy in couple relationship: Nature, assessment and therapy,

11.

(2002) Sex differences in jealousy Evolutionary mechanism or artifact of measurement? ,

12.

(2003) Female aggression as a response to sexual jealousy: A sex role reversal?,

13.

(1996) Jealousy and rational responses to infidelity across gender and culture,

14.

(2000) Psychophysiological responses to imagined infidelity:the specific innate modular view of jealousy reconsidered,

15.

(2003) Factors associated with jealousy over real and imagined infidelity:An examination of the social-cognitive and evolutionary psychology perspectives,

16.

(1995) Culture, gender, and self: A perspective from individualism-collectivism research,

17.

(2004) Aspects of morbid jealousy,

18.

(1983) Dimensions of national cultures in fifty countries and three regions Explications in cross-cultural psychology,

19.

(1991) Implications for cognition,

20.

(2006) Relationship experience as a predictor of romantic jealousy,

21.

(1997) Morbid jealousy as a variant of obsessive-compulsive disorder ,

22.

(1989181-196) Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,

23.

(1992) Understanding and conquering the shadow of love, Martin Press

24.

(1997) Cognitions and emotions: From order to disorder, Psychology Press

25.

(2003) Sex differences and similarities in jealousy The moderating influence of infidelity experience and sexual orientation of the infidelity,

26.

(2005) Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale in 53 nations:Exploring the universal and culture-specific features of global self- esteem,

27.

(2006) Men and women show distinct brain activations during imagery of sexual and emotional infidelity,

28.

(1988) A reconceptualization of a basic concept in cross- culture psychology, MacMillan

29.

(1996) The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes,

Korean Journal of Psychology: General