Measurement of Arousal Type and Avoidance Type in Chronic Procrastination: Is Validated Ferrari's Suggestion?

본 연구는 만성적 지연행동의 두 유형인 각성형과 회피형을 Lay의 일반지연행동척도(GP)와 McCown과 Johnson의 성인지연행동척도(AIP)로 측정할 수 있다는 Ferrari의 제안을 검증하기위해 수행되었다. 268명의 대학생을 대상으로 하여, 먼저 GP와 AIP 간 상관관계를 알아보았다. 다음으로 각성형 지연행동을 유발하는 주요 동기인 감각추구 동기와 회피형 지연행동을 유발하는 주요동기인 실패공포와 자기제시 동기가 GP와 AIP에서 차별적으로 관련되는지 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 두 지연행동 척도 각각을 종속변인으로 하고 감각추구, 실패공포 및 자기제시 동기를 예언변인으로 하는 중다회귀분석을 하였다. 또한 두 지연행동 척도의 평균점수를 기준으로 구성한 GP와 AIP점수가 모두 높은 집단(고/고), GP점수만 높은 집단(고/저), AIP점수만 높은 집단(저/고), GP와 AIP점수가 모두 낮은 집단(저/저)의 네 집단을 독립변인으로 하고 감각추구, 실패공포 및 자기제시 동기를 종속변인으로 하는 일원변량분석방법으로 차이검증 하였다. 그 결과 GP와 AIP 간 높은 상관을 보였고, 중다회귀분석결과 두 지연행동 척도는 감각추구와 실패공포 및 자기제시 동기와 차별적으로 관련되지 않았고, 변량분석결과 GP점수만 높은 집단과 AIP점수만 높은 집단 간의 유의미한 차이가 없는 것으로 나타나, GP와 AIP로 각성형과 회피형의 만성적 지현행동 유형을 측정할 수 있다는 Ferrari의 제안은 지지되지 않았다.

keywords: chronic procrastination, arousal type, avoidance type, Lay's GP, McCown & Johnson's AIP, sensation seeking, fear of failure, self presentation, 만성적 지연행동, 각성형 지연행동, 회피형 지연행동, Lay의 지연행동척도(GP), McCown과 Johnson의 성인지연행동척도(AIP), 감각추구, 실패공포, 자기제시, chronic procrastination, arousal type, avoidance type, Lay's GP, McCown & Johnson's AIP, sensation seeking, fear of failure, self presentation

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to validate Ferrari’s suggestion that the two type of chronic procrastination (arousal vs avoidance) is able to be measured each other with Lay's GP and McCown & Johnson's AIP. The research participants were 268 students(male 130, female 137). Three statistical analysis procedures were performed. First, the corelation between Lay's GP and McCown's AIP. Second, the multiple regression for GP and AIP with predictive variables of sensation seeking, fear of failure and self presentation. Third, the one-way analysis of variance by the independence variable of 4 groups(GP score high/AIP score high; GP score high/AIP score low; GP score low/AIP score high; GP score low/AIP score low) with the dependence variables of sensation seeking, fear of failure and self presentation. The result were as follow. First, the corelation coefficient between Lay's GP and McCown & Johnson's AIP were .780(p <.001). Second, significant predictive variables for GP and AIP were same variables as sensation seeking and fear of failure. Third, based on one-way analysis of variance, no significant difference were found for GP score low/AIP score low group and GP score low/AIP score high group with the dependence variables of sensation seeking, fear of failure and self presentation. These results indicate that Ferrari's suggestion did not to be supported.

keywords: chronic procrastination, arousal type, avoidance type, Lay's GP, McCown & Johnson's AIP, sensation seeking, fear of failure, self presentation, 만성적 지연행동, 각성형 지연행동, 회피형 지연행동, Lay의 지연행동척도(GP), McCown과 Johnson의 성인지연행동척도(AIP), 감각추구, 실패공포, 자기제시, chronic procrastination, arousal type, avoidance type, Lay's GP, McCown & Johnson's AIP, sensation seeking, fear of failure, self presentation

참고문헌

(1998) 대인 불안에 대한 자기제시 동기와 자기제시 기대의 관계,

(1995) 자극추구동기가 청소년 비행에 미치는 영향,

(2002) Multidimensional fear of failure measurement:The Performance Failure Appraisal Inventory,

(2004) Procrastination in academic settings and the big five model of personality Counseling the procrastinator in academic settings, APA Publishing

(2000) Procrastination: A means of avoiding shame or guilt?,

(1992a) Procrastination in the workplace Attributions for failure among individuals with similar behavioral tendencies,

(1992b) Psychometric validation of two adult measures of procrastination:Arousal and avoidance measures,

(1993) Explaining lack of diligence at a,

(2001) Procrastination as self- regulation failure of performance Effects of cognitive load working best under pressure European Journal of Personality,

10.

(2004) Trait procrastination in academic settings An overview of students who engage in task delays Counseling the procrastinator in academic settings, APA Publishing

11.

(2005) Exploring procrastination in corporate setting and setting for arousal and avoidance types,

12.

(1995) Procrastination and task avoidance: Theory, research, and treatment, Plenum

13.

(2006) Procrastination as a predictor of task perceptions Examining delayed and non- delayed tasks across varied deadlines,

14.

(2005) Prevalence of procrastination in the United States Arousal and avoidance delays among adults North American Journal of Psychology,

15.

(1994) Parental authority influences on the development of female dysfunctional procrastination,

16.

(2004) Social comparisons by procrastinators Rating peers with similar or dissimilar delay tendencies,

17.

(2000) Procrastination: Current issues and new directions, Select Press

18.

(2006) Procrastination rates among adults with and without AD/ HD,

19.

(2002) Differential incidence of procrastination between Blue- and White-Collar workers,

20.

(1996) Prevalence of procrastination among samples of adults,

21.

(1992) A measure of psychological symptom severity, Princeton North Shore Press

22.

(1986) my research article on procrastination Journal of Research in Personality,

23.

(1989) Validation of an adult inventory of procrastination Paper presented at the Society for Personality Assessment,

24.

(2004) Procrastination in academic settings Counseling the procrastinator in academic settings, APA Publishing

바로가기메뉴

논문 상세

Vol.25 No.2

각성형과 회피형의 만성적 지연행동 측정: Ferrari가 제안한 방법은 타당한가?

Measurement of Arousal Type and Avoidance Type in Chronic Procrastination: Is Validated Ferrari's Suggestion?

초록

Abstract

참고문헌

한국심리학회지: 일반