박민, 이승복, 윤효운, 김소영, 김혜리 (2006). 지향성 탐지기: 과제에 따른 뇌 활성화 영역 차이. 한국심리학회지: 실험, 18(2), 127-138.

박민, 이승복, 윤효운, 정우림, 김혜리 (2007). 지향성 탐지 기제에서의 개인차: 전공에 따른 뇌 활성화 영역. 인지과학, 18(2), 49-67.

이승복, 박민, 윤효운, 김혜리 (2006). 지향성 탐지 과정의 뇌 활성화: 기능적 자기공명 영상 연구. 인지과학, 17(1), 1-13.

Abu-Akel, A. (2003). A neurobiological mapping of theory of mind. Brain Research Reviews, 43(1), 29-40.

Amodio, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2006). Meeting of minds: The medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(4), 268-277.

Astington, J. W., Pelletier, J., & Homer, B. (2002). Theory of mind and epistemological development: The relation between children’s second-order false-belief understanding and their ability to reason about evidence. New Ideas in Psychology, 20(2), 131-144.

Baron-Cohen, S. (2005). 마음맹: 자폐증과 마음이론에 관한 과학에세이[Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind]. (김혜리, 이현진 역). 서울: 시그마프레스. (원전은 1995년에 출판)

Baron-Cohen, S., & Sally, W. (2004). The Empathy Quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 163-175.

Baron-Cohen, S., O’Riordan, M., Stone, V., Jones, R., & Plaisted, K. (1999). Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children and children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29(5), 407-418.

Baron-Cohen, S., Ring, H., Moriarty, J., Schmitz, B., Costa, D., & Ell, P. (1994). Recognition of mental state terms: Clinical findings in children with autism and a functional neuroimaging study of normal adults. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 165(5), 640-649.

Baron-Cohen, S., Ring, H., Wheelwright, S., Bullmore, E., Brammer, M., Simmons, A., & Williams, S, (1999). Social intelligence in the normal and autistic brain: An fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 11(6), 1891-1898.

Baron-Cohen, S., Tager-Flusberg, H., & Cohen, D. J. (Eds.). (2000). Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 42(2), 241-251.

Blakemore, S. J., Boyer, P., Pachot-Clouard, M., Meltzoff, A., Segebarth, C., & Decety, J. (2003). The detection of contingency and animacy from simple animations in the human brain. Cerebral Cortex, 13(8), 837-844.

Blakemore, S., Winston, J., & Frith, U. (2004). Social cognitive neuroscience: Where are we heading? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(5), 216-222.

Brüne, M., & Brüne-Cohrs, U. (2006). Theory of mind―Evolution, ontogeny, brain mechanisms and psychopathology. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(4), 437-455.

Brunet, E., Sarfati, Y., Hardy-Bayle, M. C., & Decety, J. (2000). A PET investigation of the attribution of intentions with a nonverbal task. NeuroImage, 11(2), 157-166.

Calarge, C., Andreasen, N. C., O’Leary, D. S. (2003). Visualizing how one brain understands another: A PET study of theory of mind. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(11), 1954-1964.

Calder, A. J., Lawrence, D., Keane, J., Scott, S. K., Owen, A. I., Christoffels, I., & Young, A. W. (2002). Reading the mind from eye gaze. Neuropsychologia, 40(8), 1129-1138.

Castelli, F., Frith, C., Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2002). Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes. Brain, 125(8), 1839-1849.

Castelli, F., Happé, F., Frith, U., & Frith, C. (2000). Movement and mind: A functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns. NeuroImage 12(3), 314-325.

Chakrabarti, B., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2006). Empathizing: Neurocognitive developmental mechanisms and individual differences. In S. Anders, G. Ende, M. Junghofer, J. Kissler & Wildgruber, D (Eds.), Progress in brain research: Vol. 156. Understanding emotions (pp. 403-418). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Channon, S., & Crawford, S. (2000). The effects of anterior lesions on performance on a story comprehension test: Left anterior impairment on a theory of mind-type task. Neuropsychologia, 38(7), 1006-1017.

Cuerva, A. G., Sabe, L., Kuzis, G., Tiberti, C., Dorrego, F., Starkstein, S. E. (2001). Theory of mind and pragmatic abilities in dementia. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, & Behavioral Neurology, 14(3), 153-158.

den Ouden, H., Frith, U., Frith, C., Blakemore, S. J. (2005). Thinking about intentions. NeuroImage, 28(4), 787-796.

Emery, N. J. (2000). The eyes have it: The neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 24(6), 581-604.

Ferstl, E. C., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2002). What does the frontomedian cortex contribute to language processing: Coherence or theory of mind. NeuroImage, 17(3), 1599-1612.

Fine, C., Lumsden, J., & Blair, R. J. R. (2001). Dissociation between ‘theory of mind’ and executive functions in a patient with early left amygdala damage. Brain, 124(2), 287-298.

Fletcher, P. C., Happé, F., Frith, U., Baker, S. C., Dolan, R. J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Frith, C. D. (1995). Other minds in the brain: A functional imaging study of “theory of mind” in story comprehension. Cognition, 57(2), 109-128.

Focquaert, F., Steven, M.S., Wolford, G.L., Colden, A., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (2007). Empathizing and systemizing cognitive traits in the sciences and humanities. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(3), 619-625.

Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2003). Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences, 358(1431), 459-473.

Gallagher, H. L., & Frith, C. D. (2003). Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(2), 77-83.

Gallagher, H. L., Happé, F., Brunswick, N., Fletcher, P. C., Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2000). Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: An fMRI study of “theory of mind” in verbal and nonverbal tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38(1), 11-21.

Gregory, C., Lough, S., Stone, V., Erzinclioglu, S., Martin, L., Baron-Cohen, S., & Hodges, J. R. (2002). Theory of mind in patients with frontal variant frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: Theoretical and practical implications. Brain, 125(4), 752-764.

Griffin, R., Friedman, O., Ween, J., Winner, E., Happé, F., & Brownell, H (2006). Theory of mind and the right cerebral hemisphere: Refining the scope of impairment. Laterality, 11(3), 195-225.

Happé, F. G. E. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters’ thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(2), 129-154.

Happé, F., Brownell, H., & Winner, E. (1999). Acquired ‘theory of mind’ impairments following stroke. Cognition, 70(3), 211-240.

Heider, F., & Simmel, M., (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57(2), 243-259.

Hooker, C. I., Paller, K. A., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B., Mesulam, M.-M., & Reber, P. J. (2003). Brain networks for analyzing eye gaze. Cognitive Brain Research, 17(2), 406-418.

Kampe, K. K., Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2003). “Hey John”: Signals conveying communicative intention toward the self activate brain regions associated with “mentalizing,” regardless of modality. Journal of Neuroscience, 23(12), 5258-5263.

Kobayashi, C., Glover, G. H., & Temple, E. (2006). Cultural and linguistic influence on neural bases of ‘Theory of Mind’: An fMRI study with Japanese bilinguals. Brain and Language, 98(2), 210-220.

Kobayashi, C., Glover, G. H., & Temple, E. (2007a). Children’s and adults’ neural bases of verbal and nonverbal ‘theory of mind’. Neuropsychologia, 45(7), 1522-1532.

Kobayashi, C., Glover, G. H., & Temple, E. (2007b). Cultural and linguistic effects on neural bases of ‘Theory of Mind’ in American and Japanese children. Brain Research, 1164, 95-107.

Leekam, S. (1993). Children’s understanding of mind. In M. Bennett (Ed.), The development of social cognition: The child as psychologist (pp. 26-61). New York: The Guilford Press.

Lough, S., & Hodges, J. R. (2002). Measuring and modifying abnormal social cognition in frontal variant frontotemporal dementia. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 53(2), 639-646.

Lough, S., Gregory, C., & Hodges, J. R. (2001). Dissociation of social cognition and executive function in frontal variant frontotemporal dementia. Neurocase, 7(2), 123-130.

Moriguchi, Y., Ohnishi, T., Mori, T., Matsuda, H., & Komaki, G. (2007). Changes of brain activity in the neural substrates for theory of mind during childhood and adolescence. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 61(4), 355-363.

Perner, J., & Lang, B. (1999). Development of theory of mind and executive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(9), 337-344.

Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a ‘theory of mind’? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 515-526.

Rowe, A. D., Bullock, P. R., Polkey, C. E., & Morris, R. G. (2001). ‘Theory of mind’ impairments and their relationship to executive functioning following frontal lobe excisions. Brain, 124(3), 600-616.

Ruby, P., & Decety, J. (2003). What do you believe versus what do you think they believe: A neuroimaging study of conceptual perspective-taking. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17(11), 2475-2480.

Saltzman, J., Strauss, E., Hunter, M., & Archibald, S. (2000). Theory of mind and executive functions in normal human aging and Parkinson’s disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6(7), 781-788.

Saxe, R. (2006). Why and how to study theory of mind with fMRI. Brain Research, 1079(1), 57-65.

Saxe, R., & Kanwisher, N. (2003). People thinking about thinking people: The role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind”. NeuroImage, 19(4), 1835-1842.

Saxe, R., & Wexler, A. (2005). Making sense of another mind: The role of the right temporo-parietal junction. Neuropsychologia, 43(10), 1391–1399.

Saxe, R., Carey, S., & Kanwisher, N. (2004). Understanding other minds: Linking developmental psychology and functional neuroimaging. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 87–124.

Saxe, R., Xiao, D. K., Kovacs, G., Perrett, D. I., & Kanwisher, N. (2004). A region of right posterior superior temporal sulcus responds to observed intentional actions. Neuropsychologia, 42(11), 1435–1446.

Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Tomer R., Berger, B. D., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2003). Characterization of empathy deficits following prefrontal brain damage: The role of the right ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(3), 324-337.

Siegal, M., & Varley, R. (2002). Neural systems involved in ‘theory of mind’. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(6), 463-471.

Siegal, M., Carrington, J., & Radel, M. (1996). Theory of mind and pragmatic understanding following: Right hemisphere damage. Brain and Language, 53(1), 40-50.

Singer, T. (2006). The neural basis and ontogeny of empathy and mind reading: Review of literature and implications for future research. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(6), 855-863.

Snowden, J. S., Gibbons, Z. C., Blackshaw, A., Doubleday, E., Thompson, J., Craufurd, D. Foster, J., Happé, F., & Neary, D. (2003). Social cognition in frontotemporal dementia and Huntington’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 41(6), 688-701.

Stone, V. E., Baron-Cohen, S., & Knight, R. T. (1998). Frontal lobe contributions to theory of mind. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(5), 640-656.

Stone, V. E., Baron-Cohen, S., Calder, A., Keane, J., & Young, A. W. (2003). Acquired theory of mind impairments in individuals with bilateral amygdala lesions. Neuropsychologia, 41(2), 209-220.

Stuss, D. T., Gallup, G. G., & Alexander, M. P. (2001). The frontal lobes are necessary for ‘theory of mind’. Brain, 124(2), 279-286.

Surian, L., & Siegal, M. (2001). Sources of performance on theory of mind tasks in right hemisphere-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 78(2), 224-232.

Tompkins, C. A., Scharp, V. L., Fassbinder, W., Meigh, K., & Armstrong, E. M. (2006). ‘Theory of mind’ in adults with right hemisphere brain damage. Brain and Language, 99(1-2), 57-58.

Varley, R., & Siegal, M. (2000). Evidence for cognition without grammar from causal reasoning and ‘theory of mind’ in an agrammatic aphasic patient. Current Biology, 10(12), 723-726.

Vogeley, K., Bussfeld, S. P., Newen, A., Herrmann, S., Happé, F., Falkai, P., Maier, W., Shah, N. J., Fink, G. R., & Zilles, K. (2001). Mind reading: Neural mechanisms of theory of mind and self-perspective. NeuroImage, 14(1), 170-181.

Völlm, B. A., Taylor, A. N. W., Richardson, P., Corcoran, R., Stirling, J., McKie, S., Deakin, J. F. W., & Elliott, R. (2006). Neuronal correlates of theory of mind and empathy: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study in a nonverbal task. NeuroImage, 29(1), 90-98.

Wicker, B., Ruby, P., Royet, J. P., & Fonlupt, P. (2003). A relation between rest and the self in the brain? Brain Research Reviews, 43(2), 224-230.

Winner, E., Brownell, H., Happé, F., Blum, A., & Pincus, D. (1998). Distinguishing lies from jokes: Theory of mind deficits and discourse interpretation in right hemisphere brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 62(1), 89-106.