바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • ENGLISH
  • P-ISSN1229-067X
  • E-ISSN2734-1127
  • KCI

ISSN : 1229-067X

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.26 No.2

Citation Share

아동의 행위자 성향 추론 능력의 발달

The development of abilities to infer others' dispositions in preschoolers

한국심리학회지: 일반 / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2007, v.26 no.2, pp.83-100
윤정은 (연세대학교)
송현주 (연세대학교)
윤정은, & 송현주. (2007). 아동의 행위자 성향 추론 능력의 발달. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 26(2), 83-100.

초록

본 연구는 외현적 추론 과제(explicit reasoning task)를 사용하여 학령 전 아동들이 행위자(agent)의 선호도(preferences) 혹은 특질(trait)과 같은 성향(disposition)에 대해 이해할 수 있는지를 보았다. 본 연구의 자극으로는 기존 연구(Kuhlmeier & Wynn, 2003)에서 사용된 자극과 유사한 동영상이 사용되어, 스스로 움직이는 것처럼 보이는 도형들이 서로 돕거나 방해하는 장면들이 아동들에게 제시되었다. 동영상을 보고 난 후 아동들에게 두 종류의 과제가 실시되었다. 첫째, 이후의 새로운 상황에서 주인공이 누구에게 다가갈 것인지를 묻는 선호 행동 예측 과제를 실시하였다. 둘째, 주인공을 도와주는 행위자와 방해하는 행위자 중에서 누가 더 착한지(혹은 나쁜지) 묻는 특질 추론 과제를 실시하여 도덕성에 가까운 추상적인 특질까지도 추론할 수 있는지를 보고자 했다. 실험 1, 2의 결과 선호 행동 예측 과제는 만 2.5세 이상의 아동이, 특질 추론 과제는 만 3.5세 이상의 아동이 성공함을 보였다. 실험 3에서는 아동들이 행동 의도에 근거하여 행위자의 성향을 판단할 수 있는지 보기 위해, 도와주려고 한 행동이 의도했던 결과를 이끌어내지 못하는 상황을 보여주면서 선호 행동 예측 과제와 특질 추론 과제를 실시한 결과, 만 3.5세 아동들이 행동의 의도에 근거해서 행위자의 성향을 추론할 수 있음을 보여주었다. 본 연구의 결과는 기존의 연구들에서 나타난 영아기 심리 추론 능력들과 비교되었고, 타 행위자의 성향에 대한 아동기 지식의 본질이 무엇인지 논의되었다.

keywords
dispositions, traits, theory of mind, explicit knowledge, 성향 이해, 특질 이해, 마음 이론, 외현적 지식

Abstract

The present research examined whether preschoolers can infer others’ dispositions in explicit reasoning tasks. Children watched two types of events in which a circle, a triangle and a square interacted. In one, either the triangle or square helped the circle climb a hill. In the other, the other agent hindered the circle from climbing the hill. After watching the events, children were asked (1) to predict which agent the circle would approach in a novel context and (2) to infer which agent was nice or bad. The children had to provide either verbal or gestural responses to the questions. The results showed that 2.5-year-olds but not younger children could predict the circle’s preference-based action. When inferring the agents’ traits, only 3.5-year-olds succeeded in the task; They did so even when the helping agent’s action did not lead to the achievement of the circle’s goal. The results are discussed in terms of the distinction between the implicit and explicit levels of knowledge of others’ dispositions.

keywords
dispositions, traits, theory of mind, explicit knowledge, 성향 이해, 특질 이해, 마음 이론, 외현적 지식

참고문헌

1.

구재선, 김혜리, 김경미, 양혜영, 고숙남 (2006). 아동의 성격 특질에 대한 이해 발달: 특질 추론과 상황적, 시간적 안정성을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 19, 1-20.

2.

김혜리 (1997). 아동의 마음에 대한 이해 발달: 틀린믿음에 대한 이해로 살펴본 마음-이론의 발달, 한국심리학회지: 발달, 10, 74-91.

3.

서상규 (1998). 말뭉치 분석에 기반을 둔 낱말 빈도의 조사와 그 응용-'연세 말뭉치'를 중심으로. 한글, 242, 225-270.

4.

Alibali, M. W., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1993). Gesture-speech mismatch and mechanisms of learning: what the hands reveal about a child’s state of mind. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 468-523.

5.

Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985) Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’? Cognition, 21, 37-46.E

6.

Call, J., Hare, B., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2004). Unwilling versus unable: chimpanzees’ understanding of human intentional action Developmental Science, 7, 488-498.

7.

Carpenter, M., Akhtar, N., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Fourteen-through 18-month-old infants differentially imitate intentional and accidental actions. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 315-330.

8.

Church, R. B. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1986). The mismatch between gesture and speech as an index of transitional knowledge. Cognition, 23, 43-71.

9.

Clement, W. A., & Perner, J. (1994). Implicit understanding of belief. Cognitive Development, 9, 377-397.

10.

Clements, W. A., Rustin, C. L., & McCallum, S. (2000). Promoting the transition from implicit to explicit understanding: A training study of false belief. Developmental Science, 3, 81–92.

11.

Csibra, G., Gergely, G., Biro, S., Koos, O., & Brockbank, M. (1999). Goal attribution without agency cues: The perception of ‘pure reason’ in infancy. Cognition, 72, 237-267.

12.

Dienes, Z., & Perner, J. (1999). A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 735-808.

13.

Fodor, J. (1992). A theory of the child’s theory of mind. Cognition, 44, 283-296.

14.

Garnham, W. A., & Ruffman, T. (2001). Doesn’t see, doesn’t know: Is anticipatory looking really related to understanding of belief? Developmental Science, 4, 94-100.

15.

Gergely, G., Nadasdy, Z., Csibra, G., & Biro, S. (1995). Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition, 56, 165-193.

16.

Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1986). From meta-processes to conscious access: evidence from children’s metalinguistic and repair data. Cognition, 23, 95-147.

17.

Kuhlmeier, V., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2003). Attribution of dispositional states by 12-month-olds. Psychological Science, 14, 402-408.

18.

Kuhlmeier, V., & Wynn, K. (2003). 9-month-olds’ understanding of intentionality. Poster presented at the biennial meeting of Society for Research in Child Development Biennial Meeting in Tampa, Florida.

19.

Leslie, A. M. (1994a). Pretending and believing: Issues in the theory of ToMM. Cognition, 50, 211-238.

20.

Leslie, A. M. (1994b). ToMM, ToBy, and Agency: Core architecture and domain specificity. In L. Hirschfeld & S. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 119-148). New York: Cambridge University Press.

21.

Luo, Y., & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Can a self-propelled box have a goal? Psychological reasoning in 5-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 16, 601-608.

22.

Meltzoff, A. (1995). Understanding the intentions of others: Re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Developmental Psychology, 31, 838-850.

23.

Onishi, K. H., & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs? Nature, 308, 255-258.

24.

Perner, J., & Clements, W. A. (1999). From an implicit to an explicit theory of mind. In Y. Rossetti & A. Revonsuo (Eds.) Beyond dissociation: Interaction between dissociated implicit and explicit processing (pp. 273-293), Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

25.

Phillips, A. T., Wellman, H. M., & Spelke, E. S. (2002). Infants’ ability to connect gaze and emotional expression to intentional action. Cognition, 85, 53-78.

26.

Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of child. London: Kegan Paul.

27.

Premack, D., & Premack, A. J. (1995). Origins of human social competence. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 205-218). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

28.

Premack, D., & Premack, A. J. (1997). Infants attribute value +/− to the goal-directed actions of self-propelled objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 848-856.

29.

Reid, V. M., Csibra, G., Belsky, J., & Johnson, M. H. (2007). Neural correlates of the perception of goal-directed action in infants. Acta Psychologica, 124, 129-138.

30.

Repacholi, B. M. (1998). Infants’ use of attentional cues to identify the referent of another person’s emotional expression. Developmental Psychology, 34, 1017-1025.

31.

Repacholi, B. M., & Gopnik, A. (1997). Early reasoning about desires: evidence from 14- and 18-month-olds. Developmental Psychology, 33, 12-21.

32.

Schlottman, A., & Surian, L. (1999). Do 9-month-olds perceive causation-at-a-distance? Perception, 28, 1105-1113.

33.

Shimizu, Y. A., & Johnson, S. C. (2004). Infants’ attribution of a goal to a morphologically unfamiliar agent. Developmental Science, 7, 425-430.

34.

Song, H., Baillargeon, R., & Fisher, C. (2005). Can infants attribute to an agent a disposition to perform a particular action? Cognition, 98, B45-B55.

35.

Song, H., & Baillargeon, R. (2007). Can 9.5-month-old infants attribute to an agent a disposition to perform a particular action on objects? Acta Psychologica, 124, 79-105.

36.

Thoermer, C., & Sodian, B. (2001). Preverbal infants’ understanding of referential gestures. First Language, 21, 245-264.

37.

Tomasello, M., & Barton, M. (1994). Learning words in nonostensive contexts. Developmental Psychology, 30, 639-650.

38.

Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103-128.

39.

Woodward, A. L. (1998). Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor’s reach. Cognition, 69, 1-34.

40.

Woodward, A. L. (1999). Infants’ ability to distinguish between purposeful and non-purposeful behaviors, Infant Behavior and Development, 22, 145-160.

41.

Woodward, A. L., & Guajardo, J. J. (2002). Infants’ understanding of the point gesture as an object-directed action. Cognitive Development, 17, 1061-1084.

42.

Woodward, A. L., & Sommerville, J. A. (2000). Twelve-month-old infants interpret action in context. Psychological Science, 11, 73-77.

한국심리학회지: 일반

논문 투고 OA 정책