Factors predicting recidivism of violent juvenile probationers: Study for developing LJP-RRAR(Larcenous Juvenile Probationers-Rapid Risk Assessment of Recidivism)

노일석

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

Apply for Authority
P-ISSN1229-067X
E-ISSN2734-1127
KCI

Home

OA Policy

ISSN : 1229-067X

Article Contents

Prev Next

e-Submission

Vol.28 No.2

Citation Share

Factors predicting recidivism of violent juvenile probationers: Study for developing LJP-RRAR(Larcenous Juvenile Probationers-Rapid Risk Assessment of Recidivism)

Korean Journal of Psychology: General / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127

2009, v.28 no.2, pp.449-470

(2009). Factors predicting recidivism of violent juvenile probationers: Study for developing LJP-RRAR(Larcenous Juvenile Probationers-Rapid Risk Assessment of Recidivism). Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 28(2), 449-470.

copy

Downloaded
Viewed

PDF Download

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to analyze factors predicting recidivism of larcenous juvenile probationers for the duration of probation term, and to develop a actuarial assessment tool designed to be employed in the practice of probation. The subjects consisted of 817 larcenous juvenile probationers who had reoffended during their terms of probation and matched sample of 675 non-recidivists. The study found significant deferences between the recidivists group and the non-recidivists group in 19 variables. Among those variables, logistic regression showed that denying accountability, age at the time of commencing probation, theft history, experience of school dropout and parents type best predicted the recidivism for the duration of probation. LJP-RRAR demonstrated that AUC value amounted to .711, which is referred to high predictive accuracy. These results of the study suggest that LJP-RRAR could be a useful and potential tool in managing juvenile probationers commensurately with their risk, and treating violent juveniles on their need basis. It is expected that the predictive accuracy and the validity would be enhanced by follow-up studies on validation, and subsequent studies considering dynamic factors and protective factors.

keywords: risk of recidivism, actuarial assessment tool, risk prediction, larcenous juvenile, juvenile probationers, 재범위험성, 계리적 평가도구, 재범예측, 절도사범, 소년보호관찰

Reference

김경호 (2008). 남자 비행청소년의 절도와 남성성에 관한 연구. 청소년복지연구, 10(3), 167-182.

김귀순, 정동빈, 박영술 (2008). SPSS를 활용한 로지스틱 회귀모형의 이해와 응용. 서울: 한나래아카데미.

김양곤, 이수정, 이민식 (2005). 소년보호관찰대상자에 대한 분류평가도구 개발에 관한 연구. 서울: 한국형사정책연구원.

김헌수, 김현실 (2001). 재범 비행 청소년의 예측인자 분석. 신경정신의학, 40(2), 279-291.

노정구, 김상조 (2002). 자아정체감 및 자극추구성향이 청소년 상점절도에 미치는 영향에 관한 탐색적 연구. 마케팅관리연구, 7(3), 155-175.

노일석 (2007). 성폭력 보호관찰청소년 재범위험성 예측도구 개발: 이종, 동종을 포함한 일반재범위험성을 중심으로. 연세대학교 심리대학원 석사학위논문.

노일석 (2009a). 청소년 폭력사범 재범 예측 요인: 폭력 소년보호관찰대상자 재범위험성 평가도구(VJP-RRAR) 개발 연구. 한국심리학회: 사회 및 성격. 심사중.

노일석 (2009b). 여자 청소년 폭력사범 재범 예측 요인: 여자 폭력소년 보호관찰대상자 재범위험성 평가도구(FVJP-RRAR) 개발 연구. 한국심리학회: 여성. 심사중.

대검찰청 (2002-2008). 범죄분석.

10.

법무부 (2008). 21C 형사정책의 중심 보호관찰.

11.

법무부 범죄예방정책국 (2004-2008). 보호관찰 통계연보.

12.

법무부 범죄예방정책국 (2008a). 보호관찰 통계처리 지침.

13.

법무부 범죄예방정책국 (2008b). 보호관찰 분류․감독 지침.

14.

서동혁, 정선주, 손창호, 김원식, 고승희, 함봉진, 조성진, 김영기, 이중재 (2001). 구속된 비행 청소년들의 석방 후 6개월 이내 재범의 예측요인. 신경정신의학, 40(3), 463 -476.

15.

이남희, 이봉건 (2009). 비행청소년의 범죄유형에 따른 재범 위험성 차이에 관한 연구 - 비행촉발요인 조사서와 PAI 검사결과를 중심으로. 한국심리학회: 사회 및 성격, 23(2), 127-140.

16.

이수정, 윤옥경 (2003). 범죄위험성의 평가와 활용방안. 한국심리학회: 일반, 22(2), 99- 126.

17.

이수정, 이민식, 홍영오, 김양곤 (2005). 보호관찰 분류지침 개발을 위한 예비연구. 한국심리학회: 일반, 24(1), 141-165.

18.

이수정, 조은경 (2005). 경찰단계에서의 소년범 위험성 평가를 위한 비행촉발요인 조사도구 개발. 한국심리학회: 사회 및 성격, 19(1), 27-43.

19.

진수명 (2001). 보호관찰과 과학적 분류처우 방법. 보호, 12, 171-221.

20.

Agnew, R. (1990). The origins of delinquent events: An examination of offender accounts. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 27(3), 267-294.

21.

Beck, E. A., & McIntyre, S. C. (1977). MMPI pattern of shoplifters within a college population. Psychological Report, 41, 1035, cited in Guffey

22.

H. J., Harris, J. R. & Laumer, F. (1979). Shopper attitudes toward shoplifting and shoplifting preventive devices. Journal of Retailing, 55(3), 75-89.

23.

Beers, J. S. (1973). A comparison of shoplifters and non shoplifters: A study of student self-conception, Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Maryland. cited in Guffey,

24.

Belson, W. A. (1975). Juvenile Theft: The Causal Factors. London, UK: Harper & Row.

25.

Coumarelos, C. (1994). Juvenile Offending: Predicting Persistence and Determining the Cost-Effectiveness of Interventions. Sydney, AU: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.

26.

Cox, A. D., Ronald, D. A., & George P. M. (1993). Social influences on adolescent shoplifting theory, evidence and implications for the retail industry. Journal of Retailing, 69(2), 234-246.

27.

Cromwell, P. (1994). Juvenile Burglars. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 45(2), 85-91.

28.

Eher, R., Rettenberger, M., Schilling, F., & Pfafflin, F. (2008). Failure of Static-99 and SORAG to predict relevant reoffense categories in relevant sexual offender subtype: A prospective study. Sexual Offender Treatment, 3(1), 132-145.

29.

Goldner, E. M., Geller, J., Birmingham, C. L., & Remick, R. A. (2000). Comparison of shoplifting behavior in patients with eating disorders, psychiatric controls and normal controls. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 45(5), 471-475.

30.

Guffey, H. J., Harris, J. R., & Laumer, F. (1979). Shopper attitudes toward shoplifting and shoplifting preventive devices. Journal of Retailing, 55(3), 75-89.

31.

Hoge, R., & Andrews, D. (2002). Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI). user's manual. North Tonawanda, New York: Multi-Health Systems.

32.

Krant, R. E. (1976). Deterrent and definitional influences on shoplifting. Social Problems, 23, 358-368.

33.

Landsheer, J. A., Hart, H., & Kox, W. (1994). Delinquent values and victim damage: Exploring the limits of neutralization theory. British Journal of Criminology, 32(2), 44-53.

34.

McCarthy, C. H., Giordano, P. C., & Knicely Henson, T. (1977). Auto theft: Offender and offense characteristics. Criminology, 15(3), 367-385.

35.

Nee, C. (1993). Car theft: The offender's perspective. Research Findings No. 3. London, UK: Home Office Research and Statistics Department.

36.

Smith, D. A., Visher, C. A., & Jarjoura, G. R. (1991). Dimensions of delinquency: Exploring the correlates of participation, frequency, and persistence of delinquent behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 28(1), 6-32.

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.28 No.2

Factors predicting recidivism of violent juvenile probationers: Study for developing LJP-RRAR(Larcenous Juvenile Probationers-Rapid Risk Assessment of Recidivism)

Abstract

Reference

Korean Journal of Psychology: General