김기찬 (1990). 한국어와 영어의 지시사 비교. Taegu Review, 41, 165-188.

김명자, 채숙희, 조은영 (2004). 지시사 대조연구. 인지과학, 15, 13-24.

김태자 (2008). 대명사에서 인지칭의 설정에 대해. 한국어학, 41, 257-282.

이기갑 (2006). 국어 담화의 연결 표지: 완형 표현의 반복. 담화와 인지, 13, 133-158.

이재호 (1993). 시간경과에 따른 대명사 참조해결과정. 미발간 고려대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

이재호 (2006). 담화글의 대명사 참조해결과정: 명명과제에 반영된 성별표지와 언급순서의 상호작용. 한국심리학회지: 실험, 18, 39-56.

이재호, 김성일 (1998). 언어 이해과정의 연구 방법. 이정모, 이재호 (편), 인지심리학의 제 문제 Ⅱ: 언어와 인지 (155-182쪽). 서울: 학지사.

이재호, 이정모, 김성일, 박태진 (2002). 한국어 어휘의 언급순서가 문장 기억의 표상에 미치는 효과: 첫 언급, 최신, 및 의미편향 효과의 상호작용. 한국심리학회지: 실험 및 인지, 14, 409-427.

이향천 (2008). 무엇을 명사라고 하는가? 언어학, 50, 153-183.

Abbott, B. (2006). Definite and indefinite. In K. Browh (ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed., vol. 3, pp.392-399). Oxford: Elsevier.

Almor, A. (1999). Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: The informational load hypothesis. Psychological Review, 106, 748-765.

Almor, A., & Eimas, P. D. (2008). Focus and noun phrase anaphors in spoken language comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 201-225.

Almor, A., & Nair, V. A. (2007). The form of referential expressions in discourse. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, 84-99.

Ariel, M. (2001). Accessibility theory: An overview. In T. Sanders, J. Schilperoord, & W. Spooren (Eds.), Text representation: linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects (pp.29-87). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Foraker, S., & McElree, B. (2007). The role of prominence in pronoun resolution: Active versus passive representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 357-383.

Cowles, H. W., & Garnham, A. (2005). Antecedent focus and conceptual distance effects in category noun-phrase anaphora. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 725–750.

Garrod, S. C. and Sanford, A. J. (1977). Interpreting anaphoric relations: The Integration of semantic information while reading. Journal of Verbal learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 77-90.

Garrod, S., & Sanford, A. (1990). Referential processes in reading: Focusing on roles and individuals. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d'Arcais, K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp.465-486). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Gernsbacher, M. A. (1989). Mechanisms that improve referential access. Cognition, 32, 99- 156.

Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Gernsbacher, M. A. (1997). Two decades of structure building. Discourse Processes, 23, 265-304.

Gordon, P. C., & Chan, D. (1995). Pronouns, passives, and discourse coherence. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 216-231.

Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Foster, K. L. (2000). Language comprehension and probe-list memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 766-775.

Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., Ledoux, K., & Yang, C. L. (1999). Processing of reference and the structure of language: An analysis of complex noun phrases. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 353-379.

Gundel, J. K., & Hedberg, N. (Eds.) (2008). Reference: Interdisciplinary perspectives. N.Y.: Oxford University Press.

Gundel, J. K., Hegarty, M., & Borthen, K. (2001). Information structure and pronominal reference to clausally introduced entities. In I. Kruijff-Korbay & M. Steedman, (Eds.), Proceedings from the Workshop on Information Structure. European Summer School in Logic, Language, and Information (ESSLLI). Helsinki, pp.37-51.

Gundel, J., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69, 274- 307.

Gundel, J., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R. (2005). Demonstrative pronouns in natural discourse. In A. Branco, T. McEnery, & R. Mitkov (eds.), Anaphora processing: Linguistic, cognitive and computational Modelling (pp.351-364). John Benjamins.

Haberlandt, K. (1994). Methods in reading research. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp.1-31). N.Y.: Academic Press.

Kim, S. I., Lee, J-H., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2004). The advantage of first mention in Korean: The temporal contributions of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic factors. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 33, 475-491.

Klin, C. M., Weingartner, K. M., Guzman, A. E., & Levine, W. H. (2004). Readers' sensitivity to linguistic cues in narratives: How salience influences anaphor resolution. Memory and Cognition, 32, 511-522.

Lee, J-H. (2005). Anaphoric inference in expository text: The effects of anaphora type, mention order and typicality of antecedent. The 27th Cognitive Science Society Annual Meeting. Stresa, Italy.

Lee, J-H., & Kim, S. (2009). Sentence processing and memory representation in Korean. In J. Lee, G. Simpson & Y. Kim (Eds.), Handbook of East Asian Psycholinguistics: Vol. III: Korean (pp.442-453). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lee, J-M., & Lee, J-H. (2005). Contrast information processing in discourse comprehension. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 16, 69-92.

Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K. (1987). Against modularity. In J. L. Garfield (Ed.), Modularity in knowledge representation and natural-language understanding (pp.37-62). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Sanders, T., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2004). Accessibility in text and discourse processing. Discourse Processes, 37, 79-89.

Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (1981). Understanding written language. N.Y.: John Wiley.

Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. E. (1989). What, when, and how?: Questions of immediacy in anaphoric reference resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 235-262.

Tapiero, I. (2007). Situation models and levels of coherence: Toward a definition of comprehension. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

van Gompel, R. P. G., & Mijid, A. (2004). Antecedent frequency effects during the processing of pronouns. Cognition, 90, 255-264.