바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

Establishment and management of Departmental Review Board(DRB)

Korean Journal of Psychology: General / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2010, v.29 no.1, pp.165-193



Abstract

As professional and public attention is drawn to ethical principles of Human Subject Research, research institutes, universities, and academic associations as well as government have endeavored to set up an Institute Review Board(IRB) to regulate and monitor ethical standards and rules for operation. Despite increased need for IRB, access to IRB has been limited to researchers due to practical reasons. Department of Psychology at Yonsei University established the Departmental Review Board(DRB) as a substitute system to IRB in 2006. This article provided information about establishment and management of the DRB, as well as its accomplishments made during the past 3 years using objective data. The DRB rules, regulations and forms were attached in the appendix. Future directions and suggestions were discussed.

keywords
연구 윤리, 기관심의위원회, 학과 연구심의위원회, 윤리규정, 시행세칙, Departmental Review Board, Institutional Review Board, Research ethics

Reference

1.

김옥주 (2008, 6월) 국내외 대학 IRB 현황과 활성화 방안, 제 2회 2008 연구윤리포럼GRP교육과 실천, 연구강국을 향하여.

2.

생명윤리 및 안전에 관한 법률 (2004년 제정, 2008년 개정) 법률 제9100호

3.

한국한국학술진흥재단 (2006년) 연구윤리소개. 서울

4.

한국학술진흥재단 (2007) 외국 대학의 연구 윤리 확립 활동 사례. 서울

5.

학술진흥재단 (2007년 2월) 국내 연구윤리활동 실태 조사 분석 (정책연구-2006-윤리02), 서울.

6.

한국학술진흥재단 (2007년 10월). 올바른 연구 실천의 방향과 재단, 제 1회 2007 연구윤리포럼자료.

7.

American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597-1611

8.

American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Washington, DC: Author

9.

Christakis, N. A (1988). Should IRB monitor research more strickly? IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 10, 8-10

10.

Office for Human Research Protections (1991, June) Code of Federal Regulations, Revised June 23, 2005; http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/ humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm

11.

Willians, P. C. (1984) Success in spite of failure: Why IRBs falter in reviewing risks and benefits. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 10, 1-4

12.

The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research, Washington, D. C.

13.

Directives for Human Experiment: Nuremberg Code (1949)

Korean Journal of Psychology: General