Problems of Calculating IQ and SQ in Judgment of Intelletual Disabilities

This review is aimed to discuss problems of calculating IQ & SQ in judgement of intellectual disabilities and to propose further researches and tasks. In calculating IQ, we have often encountered problems that 1) same subjects got different quotient by various tools/versions 2) equal aged subjects got different quotient by different tools 3) IQ tests did not have norm for elderly(in K-WAIS, over 64) and unable to calculate specific IQ for persons with very low intellectual function(eg. K-WAIS cannot display less than IQ 45). Also, in calculating SQ, there were problems with applying arbitrary CA(Chronological Age) for persons older than 30 and using test items out of date. Fair judgement of intellectual disabilities is very important not only for each individuals involved but also for public society because it is used to determine the beneficiary of disability pension. We also suggested the necessity of 1) psychological evaluation by licensed clinicians 2) consensus among psychologist about IQ/SQ calculation 3) active trial to reflect psychologist's opinion in legislation of intellectual disabilities.

keywords: judgement of intellectual disabilities․mental retardation․IQ․SQ․disabilities Act, 지적장애 판정․정신지체․지능지수․사회성숙지수․장애인복지법, judgement of intellectual disabilities․mental retardation․IQ․SQ․disabilities Act

Reference

곽금주, 박혜원, 김청택 (2001). 한국 웩슬러 아동 지능검사 3판(K-WISC-III) 지침서. 서울: 특수교육.

곽금주, 오상우, 김청택 (2011). 한국 웩슬러 아동지능검사 4판(K-WISC-IV) 지침서. 서울: 학지사.

김승국, 김옥기 (1995). 사회성숙도검사. 서울: 중앙적성출판사.

박경숙, 윤점룡, 박효정, 박혜정, 권기묵 (1987). 교육개발원 아동용 웩슬러 지능검사(KEDI -WISC) 지침서. 서울: 한국교육개발원.

방정식 (2010). AAIDD 11차 지적장애 정의와 분류 체제의 함의. 지적장애연구, 12(4), 1- 19.

박혜원, 곽금주, 박광배 (2002). 한국 웩슬러 유아지능검사 지침서. 서울: 특수교육

법률 제 10220호 (2010). 장애인복지법.

법률 제 10255호 (2010). 장애인연금법

보건복지부령 제 50호 (2011). 장애인복지법 시행규칙.

10.

보건복지부령 제 12호 (2010). 장애인연금법 시행규칙.

11.

이슬아, 김근향 (2010). 지적장애 판정 과정에서의 문제점: 지능지수와 사회성숙 지수의 산출을 중심으로. 2010년도 한국임상심리학회 가능학술대회 자료집 1, pp. 265- 266. 10월 14일. 서울: 백범기념관.

12.

염태호, 박영숙, 오경자, 김정규, 이영호 (1992). K-WAIS 실시요강. 한국가이던스.

13.

임현택, 송흥기, 홍나래 (2010). 국민연금 장애심사기준 개선연구: 눈, 정신․신경계통. 국민연금연구원.

14.

정종화, 이경준 (2011). 외국의 장애판정제도고찰을 통한 한국의 개선방향:일본과 독일의 사례를 중심으로. 재활복지, 15(2), 275- 304.

15.

통계청 (2010). 2010 장애인 통계. 한국장애인고용공단 고용개발원.

16.

American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-IV-TR Fourth Edition. Washington DC.: American Psychiatric Publishing.

17.

American Psychiatric Association. (2011). American Psychiatric Association Development. http://www. dsm5.org.

18.

Schaffer, D., Gould, M. S., Brasic, J., Ambrosini, P., Fischer, P., Bird, H., Aluwahlia, S. (1983). AChildren's Global Assessment Scale. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 1228-1231.

19.

Wechsler, D. (2008). WAIS-IV: Administration and scoring manual.. San Antonio, TX : Pearson.

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.30 No.3

Problems of Calculating IQ and SQ in Judgment of Intelletual Disabilities

Abstract

Reference

Korean Journal of Psychology: General