바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

  • KOREAN
  • P-ISSN1229-067X
  • E-ISSN2734-1127
  • KCI

ISSN : 1229-067X

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.30 No.3

Citation Share

Liberals and Conservatives Differ in Moral Foundations: How They Think Adultery?

Korean Journal of Psychology: General / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2011, v.30 no.3, pp.727-741


& (2011). Liberals and Conservatives Differ in Moral Foundations: How They Think Adultery?. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 30(3), 727-741.

Abstract

This research examines which moral foundations liberals and conservatives use when they make moral judgments of social issues. Moral foundations theory (Haidt & Joseph, 2004) suggests three moral foundations, authority/respect, ingroup/loyalty, purity/sanctity in addition to harm/care and fairness/ reciprocity which have been focused in western society. To test moral foundation theory based especially on the three additional moral domains, we elicited and analyzed liberals' and conservatives' schemata for adultery. In Study 1, we found 12 moral elements for adultery through group and individual interviews. In Study 2, we analyzed liberals' and conservatives' moral schema networks for adultery. Social network analysis showed that conservatives' moral network was larger and denser than liberals'. In addition, liberals judged adultery on the basis of the ethics of autonomy (freedom) and thought that consequential values of adultery (family, children, law) were highly relevant with adultery. By contrast, conservatives used more purity-related factors (e.g., sin, obscene) than liberals and thought that deontological values (disloyal, betray) were highly relevant with adultery. These findings suggest moral foundations theory can be also valid in Korean society.

keywords
liberals and conservatives, moral foundations theory, adultery, social network analysis, 진보와 보수, 도덕적 기반이론, 간통죄, 사회연결망분석

Reference

1.

김경미 (2009). 진보와 보수, 좌파와 우파에 대한 이론적 좌표설정 모색. 정치․정보 연구, 12(1), 45-60.

2.

김용학 (2007). 사회연결망 분석. 박영사.

3.

이선아 (2009). 감성적 인터페이스 디자인을 위한 스토리텔링: 스키마 부합도를 중심으로. 연세대학교 석사학위 논문.

4.

정재철 (2002). 한국언론과 이념담론. 한국언론학보, 46(4), 314-348.

5.

황신웅 (2005). 모바일 기기 구매 의사결정에 관한 멘탈 모델의 추출. 연세대학교 박사학위 논문.

6.

Altemeyer, R. A.(1996). The autoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

7.

Cooke, N. M., Durso, F. T., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1986). Recall and measures of memory organization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 538-549.

8.

Girvan M., & Newman M. E. J. (2002). Community structure in social and biological networks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 99, 7821–7826.

9.

Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. (2009). Liberals and conservatives use different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029-1046.

10.

Gutmann, A. (2001). Liberalism. In Smelser N. J., and Baltes P. B. (Eds), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, New York; Elsevier.

11.

Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98-116.

12.

Haidt, J., & Hersh, M. (2001). Sexual morality: The cultures and emotions of conservatives and liberals. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 191-221.

13.

Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus, Fall, 55-66.

14.

Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61, 651-670.

15.

Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition, Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.

16.

Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 126-136.

17.

McCrae, R. R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 323-337.

18.

Muller, J. Z. (1997). What is conservative social and political thought? In J. Z. Muller (Ed), Conservatism: An anthology of social and political thought from David Hume to the present. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

19.

Tetlock, P. E. (1984). Cognitive style and political belief systems in the British House of Commons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 365-375.

20.

Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

21.

Uhlmann, E. L., Pizarro, D. A., Tannenbaum, D., & Ditto, P. H. (2009). The motivated use of moral principles. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 479-491.

22.

Van Hiel, A., & Mervielde, I. (2004). Openness to experience and boundaries in the mind: Relationships between cultural and economic conservative beliefs. Journal of Personality, 72, 659-686.

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

e-Submission OA Policy