바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

ISSN : 1229-067X

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.30 No.3
Citation Share

Development of a Short Form of the MMPI Scale 2 using Full-Information Item Factor Analysis

Korean Journal of Psychology: General / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2011, v.30 no.3, pp.811-830




& (2011). Development of a Short Form of the MMPI Scale 2 using Full-Information Item Factor Analysis. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 30(3), 811-830.
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory(MMPI) is one of the most popular and widely used personality assessment instruments in various settings. The primary advantage of the MMPI-2 is to provide an accurate and comprehensive personality profile based on affluent data. On the other hand, a shortcoming of the MMPI is that length of the test instrument and amount of time required for test administration are too long. Therefore, many researchers have developed short forms of the MMPI, which were of less items and less time consuming than the full MMPI, while retaining its validity and clinical utility. The purpose of this study was to develop a short form of the MMPI-2 (Depression scale) using full-information item factor analysis method. The reliability and validity of our short form were reasonably good. Three factors were extracted and labelled as subjective depression, difficulty in interpersonal relations, and decrease of physical activities respectively. The items of our short form showed a very high utility(R^2.948) of predicting scores of the full version and high correlations(.449∼.898) with Harris-Lingoes subscales and depression subscales. These results indicate that the short form has adequate reliability and validity, and explains the variability of the full version scores sufficiently. Thus it can be used as a substitute when it is not feasible to use the full version. Finally, the implications and limitations of the study along with suggestions for future research are discussed.

keywords
MMPI-2, 완전-정보 문항 요인분석, 우울, 단축형 척도, MMPI-2, Full-Information Factor Analysis, Depression, Short form scale

Reference

1.

강민아, 임경희 (2006). 성폭력 피해 자녀 어머니의 심리적 특성: MMPI, BDI, STAI에 관한 비교연구. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 11(4), 419-436.

2.

강태훈 (2007). 교육 및 심리검사의 구인 타당도 검증을 위한 완전-정보 문항 요인분석의 적용. 교육평가연구, 20, 173-197.

3.

권석만 (2000). 우울증: 침체와 절망의 늪. 서울: 학지사.

4.

김정택, 신동균 (1978). STAI의 표준화에 관한 연구. 최신의학, 21, 70-72.

5.

김중술 (1999). 단축형 인성검사(MMPI-168)와 인성검사 원형간의 임상적 해석의 비교. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 18, 183-206.

6.

이순묵, 반재천, 이형초, 최윤경, 이순영 (2007). 인터넷 중독 진단방식의 전환: 규준참조평가에서 영역참조평가로. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 26, 213-238.

7.

이영호, 송종영 (1991). BDI, SDS, MMPI-D 척도의 신뢰도와 타당도에 대한 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 10(1), 98-113.

8.

한경희, 임지영, 민병배, 이정흠, 문경주, 김중술 (2006). 한국판 MMPI-2의 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 25, 533-564.

9.

황순택 (1997). MMPI 실시 및 해석의 기초. 97년도 정신보건임상심리사 제 1, 2차 학회 공동교육 자료집.

10.

Archer, R. P., Tirrell, C. A., & Elkins, D. E. (2001). Evaluation of an MMPI-A form: Implications for adaptive testing. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 76-89.

11.

Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4(June), 53-63.

12.

Bock, R. D., Gibbons, R., & Muraki, E. (1988). Full-information item factor analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 261-280.

13.

Bock, R. D., Gibbons, R., Schilling, S. G., Muraki, E., Wilson, D. T., & Wood, R. (2003). TESTFACT 4.0 [Computer program and manual]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.

14.

Browne, M. W., Cudeck, R., Tateneni, K., & Mels, G. (2004). CEFA: Comprehensive Exploratory Factor Analysis 2.00 [Computer program and manual].

15.

Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemer, B. (1989). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2(MMPI-2): Manual for Administration and Scoring. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

16.

Carroll, J. B. (1945). The effect of difficulty and chance success on correlations between items or between tests. Psychometrika, 10, 1-19.

17.

Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276.

18.

Childs, R. A., Dahlstrom, W. G., & Panter, A. T. (2000). Item response theory in personality assessment: A demonstration using the MMPI-2 depression scale. Assessment, 7, 37-54.

19.

Clavelle, P. R., & Butcher, J. N. (1977). An adaptive typological approach to psychiatric screening. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 851-859.

20.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.

21.

Dean, E. F. (1972). A lengthened Mini : The Midi-Mult. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 68-71.

22.

Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.

23.

Fraser, C., & McDonald, R. K. (1988). NOHARM: A computer program for fitting both unidimensional and multidimensional normal ogive models of latent trait theory(VersionⅡ) [Computer program and manual]. New South Wales, Australia: University of New England.

24.

Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor Analysis (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA

25.

Graham, J. R. (2007). MMPI-2: 성격 및 정신병리 평가 [MMPI-2: Assessing Personality and Psychopathology]. (이훈진, 문혜신, 박현진, 유성진, 김지영 역). 서울: 시그마프레스. (원전은 2005에 출판)

26.

Jarmusik, V. V., & Ward, L. C. (1988). An easily comprehensible MMPI short form for rapid assessment of illiterate patients. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 360-367.

27.

Johnson, J. H., Null, C., Butcher, J. N., & Johnson, K. N. (1984). Replicated item level factor analysis of the full MMPI. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 105-114.

28.

Kincannon, J. C. (1968). Prediction of the standard MMPI scale scores from 71items: Midi-Mult. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 32, 319-325.

29.

Kleinmuntz, B., & McLean, R. S. (1968). Computers in behavior science: Diagnostic interviewing by digital computer, Behavior Science, 13, 75-80.

30.

McLachlan, J. F. C. (1974). Test-retest stability of long and short MMPI scales over two years. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 30, 189-191.

31.

Muthén, B. O. (1989). Dichotomous factor analysis of symptom data. Sociological Methods & Research, 18, 19-65.

32.

Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (2001). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables [Computer program and manual]. Los Angeles: Statmodel.

33.

Roper, B. L., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Butcher, J. N. (1991). Comparability of computerized adaptive and conventional testing with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 278-290.

34.

Sanders, R. L. (1985). Computer-administered individualized psychological testing: A feasibility study. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 23, 197-213.

35.

SAS Institute, Inc. (2004). SAS 9.1.3 [Computer program and manual]. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.

36.

SPSS Inc. (2006). SPSS 15.0 [Computer program and manual]. Chicago: SPSS Inc.

37.

Steingberg, L., & Thissen, D. (1995). Item response theory in personality research. In P. E. Shrout & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Personality research, methods, and theory: A festschrift hornoring Donald W. Fiske(pp.161-181). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

38.

Stevens, M. R., & Reilley, R. R. (1980). MMPI short forms: A literature review. Journal of Personality Assessment, 44, 368-376.

39.

Stone, C. A., & Yeh, C. (2006). Assessing the dimensionality and factor structure of multiple-choice exams. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 193-214.

40.

Weiss, D. J. (1985). Adaptive testing by computer. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 774-789.

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

e-Submission OA Policy