Construction and Validation of Korean Version of CPGI

이 연구의 목적은 한국판 CPGI(Canadian Problem Gambling Index; KCPGI-2011)를 제작하고, 번역타당도가 확보되었는지를 확인하는데 있다. 기존에 번안되어 사용되고 있는 한국판 CPGI의 문제점을 지적하고 이를 보완하기 위해 역번역 절차와 번역타당도를 확인한 한국판 CPGI에 대한 타당화 연구를 수행하였다. 번역과정에서는 이중언어자 6명이 번역과 역번역 절차에 참여하였고, 예비검사에서는 대학생과 도박중독자 278명, 본검사에서는 대학생과 도박중독자 277명을 대상으로 KCPGI-2011과 KNODS-2011이 실시되었다. 요인분석결과 KCPGI-2011에서는 단일요인이 추출되었고, 각 문항들은 모두 높은 요인부하량을 나타냈다. 또한 수렴타당도 확인을 위해 실시된 KNODS-2011와의 상관은 .79로 높은 상관이 있는 것으로 밝혀졌다. 성별(남, 녀), 소득수준(연소득 4000만원이상: 소득상, 3000만원이하: 소득하), 도박종류(카지노, 경마)에 따라 측정동등성이 유지되는지를 검증한 결과 모든 집단에서 측정동등성이 유지되는 것이 확인되었다. 끝으로 본 척도의 제한점과 추후 연구방향에 관해 논의하였다.

keywords: Korean Version of CPGI, cross-cultural test adaptation, psychometric equivalence, problem gambling, 한국판 CPGI, 문화간 검사 번안, 측정동등성, 도박중독, Korean Version of CPGI, cross-cultural test adaptation, psychometric equivalence, problem gambling

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to construct and validate the Korean version of Canadian Problem Gambling Index 2011(KCPGI-2011). In the process we adopted standard cross-cultural test adaptation procedure which included translation, back-translation, and validation processes. Six bilinguals participated in the translation and back-translation process, and 278 and 277 college students and adult gamblers responded to the preliminary and main data collection processes, respectively. They responded to KCPGI- 2011 and KNODS-2011(Korean version of NODS) which is another measure of problem gambling developed in the US. The KNODS-2011 was adopted to examine convergent validity of the KCPGI-2011. One common factor was extracted from the exploratory factor analysis using the responses from the preliminary group. This factor explained 97% of the total variance. The correlation between the KNODS- 2011 and the KCPGI-2011 was r=.79 providing a solid evidence of convergent validity of the two Korean versions. To test whether the KCPGI-2011 can be used across gender groups, high and low income groups, and different gambling groups, we conducted psychometric equivalence test, including configural, metric, and scalar invariance testing using the responses from the main group. Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis results revealed that psychometric equivalence was supported between all corresponding groups, which provided a ground that the KCPGI-2011 would be safe to use and to compare individuals’ scores directly in all involved corresponding groups. Results were discussed in relation to the limitation of this study and some directions for further research using this newly constructed index.

keywords: Korean Version of CPGI, cross-cultural test adaptation, psychometric equivalence, problem gambling, 한국판 CPGI, 문화간 검사 번안, 측정동등성, 도박중독, Korean Version of CPGI, cross-cultural test adaptation, psychometric equivalence, problem gambling

참고문헌

강성군 (2010). 도박행동과 문제의 성차: 내국인 카지노 출입자를 중심으로. 충남대학교 박사학위 청구논문.

권선중, 김교헌 (2011). DSM-Ⅳ와 DSM-Ⅴ의 도박중독 진단기준 비교: 유병률 추정을 중심으로. 2011 한국심리학회 연차대회 논문집.

김교헌 (2003). 병적 도박 선별을 위한 K-NODS의 신뢰도와 타당도. 한국심리학회지: 건강. 8, 487-509.

김교헌 (2006). 도박 행동의 자기조절모형: 상식모형의 확장. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 11, 243-274.

김아영, 임은영 (2003). 타문화권 척도 번안과정에서 적용되는 절차들 간의 효과비교. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 22(1), 89-113.

김한조 (2010). 다집단 분석에서의 부분 동일성 전략들: 적절한 전략을 찾기위한 시뮬레이션 연구. 성균관대학교 석사학위논문.

손원숙 (2003). 심리검사 번안에 대한 통합적 접근. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 22(2), 57-80.

이경희 (2009). 한국판 캐나다 문제도박척도(CPGI)의 타당화를 위한 예비연구. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 14, 667-675.

이순묵 (2002). 사회과학을 위한 측정의 원리. 서울: 학지사.

10.

이순묵, 금은희, 이찬순 (2010). 다집단분석의 문제: 평균구조분석에서의 측정원점 동일성 검증필요 여부. 교육평가연구, 23(2), 391-416.

11.

이순묵, 김아영, 권선중, 김종남, 차정은, 김인혜 (2011). 전국민 대상 도박문제 선별척도 및 기준점수 타당화 연구. 서울: 사행산업통합감독위원회.

12.

이순묵, 김인혜 (2009). 구조방정식모형에서 다집단 분석의 문제 및 대안으로서의 다특질 다상황 다방법 모형. 교육평가연구, 22(1), 219-242.

13.

이순묵, 김종남, 최삼욱, 현명호, 김수진 (2009). 도박의 정의와 범주화에 대한 개념의 명확화. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 28(1), 1-27.

14.

이순묵, 김한조 (2011). 구조방정식 모형의 일반화 또는 집단차 연구를 위한 다집단 분석의 관행과 문제점. 사회과학(성균관대), 43(1), 63-112.

15.

이흥표 (2008). “도박중독 진단에 대한 논의: 토론”. 한국사회의 도박중독 문제: 어떻게 풀어가나. 한국심리학회 중독심리 전문가 위원회 및 충남대 중독행동 연구소. 2008년도 제2차 중독심리 공동교육 교재, 45-52.

16.

이흥표 (2003). 비합리적 도박신념, 도박동기 및 위험감수 성향과 병적 도박의 관계. 고려대학교 박사학위 청구논문.

17.

충남대 산학협력단 (2010). 사행산업 이용실태 조사. 서울: 사행산업통합감독위원회.

18.

한국마사회 (2009). 전국민 대상 대규모 도박이용실태 조사. 경기도: 한국마사회.

19.

American Psychiatric Association (1994). DSM-Ⅳ: Diagnostic and statistical mannual of mental disorders(4rd ed.). Washington, DC: APA.

20.

Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. NY: Wiley.

21.

Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross- cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216.

22.

Chan, D. (2000). Detection of differential item functioning on the Kirton adaption-innovation inventory using multiple-group mean and covariance structure analyses. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35(2), 169-199.

23.

Cohen J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

24.

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233-255.

25.

Eremenco, S. L., Cella, D., & Arnold, B. J. (2005). A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaire. Evaluation & The Health Professions, 28(2), 212-232.

26.

Feigelman, W., Kleinman, P. H., Lesieur, H. R, Millman, R. B., & Lesser, M. L. (1995). Pathological gambling among methadone patients. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 39, 75- 81.

27.

Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report. Toronto, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.

28.

Grant, J. E., & Kim, S. W. (2001). Demographic and clinical features of 131 adult pathological gamblers. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 62, 957 -962.

29.

Hall, G. W., Carriero, N. J., Takushi, R. Y., Montoya, I. D., Preston, K. L., & Gorelick, D. A. (2000). Pathological gambling among cocaine-dependent outpatients. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 1127–1133.

30.

Hambleton, R. K. (1993). Translating achievement tests for use in cross-national studies. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 9(1), 57-68.

31.

Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1985). Measurement in cross-cultural psychology: a review and comparison of strategies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 16(2), 131-152.

32.

Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Statistical analysis of sets congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36(2), 109-133.

33.

Jöreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: Use's Reference Guide, Chicago: Scientific Software International.

34.

Ladouceur, R., Jacques, C., Chevalier, S., Sevigny, S., & Hamel, D. (2005). Prevalence of pathological gambling in Quebec in 2002. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 50, 451-456.

35.

LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., LaBrie, R. A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2006). Men & women playing games: gender and the gambling preferences of Iowa gambling treatment program participants, Journal of Gambling Studies, 22(1), 65-80.

36.

Lee, S., & Kim, H. (2011). Interaction between test strategies and invariance/noninvariance conditions in testing for partial(metric) invariance in structural equation modeling. Paper presented at the 17th International Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Hong Kong, July 21, 2011.

37.

Mark, M. E., & Lesieur, H. R. (1992). A feminist critique of problem gambling research, British Journal of Addiction, 87, 549-565.

38.

Michell, J. (1986). Measurement scales and statistics: A clash of paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 398-407.

39.

National Gambling Impact Study Commission (NGISC, 1999). Gambling impact and behavior study. Washington, D. C.: Author.

40.

National Research Council. (NRC, 1999). Pathological gambling: A critical review. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

41.

Nower, L., & Blaszczynski, A. (2006). Characteristics and gender differences in casino self excluders: Missouri data. Journal of Gambling Studies, 22, 82-99.

42.

Orford, J., Sproston, K., Erens, B., White, C., & Mitchell, L. (2003). Gambling and problem gambling in Britain. New York: Brunner- Routledge.

43.

Petry, N. M. (2005). Pathological gambling: Etiology, comorbidity and treatments. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

44.

Shaffer, H. J., LaBrie, R., Scanlan, K. M., & Cummings, T. N. (1994). Pathological gambling among adolescents: Massachusetts gambling screen(MAGS). Journal of Gambling Studies, 10(4), 339-362.

45.

Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O. S., & Drasgow, F. (2006). Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Toward a unified strategy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1292-1306.

46.

Steenkamp, J-B. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, June, 78-90.

47.

Tavares, H., Zilberman, M. L., Beites, F., & Gentil, V. (2001). Gender differences in treatment-seeking gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17, 151-159.

48.

Temcheff, C. E., Derevensky, J. L., & Paskus, T. S. (2011). Pathological and disordered gambling: a comparison of DSM-Ⅳ and DSM -Ⅴ criteria. International Gambling Studies, DOI: 10.1080/14459795.2011.581677.

49.

Vandenberg, R. J. (2002). Toward a further understanding of and improvement in measurement invariance methods and procedures. Organizational Research Methods, 5(2), 139-158.

50.

Volberg, R. A., Nysse-Carris, K. L., & Gerstein, D. R. (2006). 2006 California Problem Gambling Prevalence Survey. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago.

51.

Volberg, R., & Wray, M. (2007). Legal gambling and problem gambling as mechanisms of social domination? American Behavioral Scientist, 51, 56-85.

52.

Weiss, L., & Petry, N. (2008). Psychometric properties of the inventory of gambling situations with a focus on gender and age differences. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 196, 321-328.

53.

Wong, I. L., & So, E. M. (2003). Prevalence estimates of problem and pathological gambling in Hong Kong. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(7), 1353–1354.

54.

Yoon, M., & Millsap, R. E. (2007). Detecting violations of factorial invariance using data-based specification searches: A monte carlo study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 435-463.

바로가기메뉴

논문 상세

Vol.30 No.4

CPGI의 한국판 제작 및 타당화

Construction and Validation of Korean Version of CPGI

초록

Abstract

참고문헌

한국심리학회지: 일반