바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1229-067X

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.31 No.1
Citation Share

차별적 정서척도(DES-Ⅳ)의 타당화

Validation of the Differential Emotions Scale-Ⅳ(DES-Ⅳ) in a Korean population

한국심리학회지: 일반 / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2012, v.31 no.1, pp.147-167
이선화 (충북대학교)
김보미 (충북대학교)
유성은 (충북대학교)
이선화, 김보미, & 유성은. (2012). 차별적 정서척도(DES-Ⅳ)의 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 31(1), 147-167.
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

초록

본 연구는 Izard가 개발한 차별적 정서척도 (Differential Emotions Scale-IV, DES-IV; Izard, Libero, Putnam, & Haynes, 1993)를 번안하여 신뢰도와 타당도를 검증하는 것을 주요 목적으로 하였다. 차별적 정서이론(Izard, 1971)을 바탕으로 개발된 차별적 정서척도는 흥미, 즐거움, 놀람, 슬픔, 화, 혐오, 경멸, 공포, 죄책감, 수치심, 수줍음, 자기 적대감의 12가지 개별적인 정서경험을 측정하는 자기보고식 척도이다. 차별적 정서척도의 타당도 검증을 위해 대학에 재학 중인 학생 867명을 대상으로 차별적 정서척도, 정적 정서 및 부적 정서 척도, 성격 5요인 척도와 간이정신진단검사를 실시하였다. 연구 결과, 차별적 정서 척도의 12요인 모두 적합한 내적 일치도 계수, 문항-요인 간 총점 상관을 보여 내적 신뢰도가 검증되었고, 230명을 대상으로 일주일 간격으로 차별적 정서척도를 실시한 결과 양호한 검사-재검사 신뢰도가 나타났다. 특히, 수치심, 수줍음, 내부 적대감의 경우 높은 안정성을 보이는 경향이 있었다. 구성 타당도 검증을 위해 확인적 요인 분석을 실시한 결과, 모든 요인 간 상관을 설정한 12요인 모델의 적합성이 가장 양호한 것으로 나타났다. 차별적 정서 12요인과 한국판 정적 정서 및 부적 정서척도와의 상관을 살펴 본 결과, 차별적 정서척도의 수렴 타당도와 변별 타당도를 확인하였다. 또한, 12정서 요인들은 성격 5요인과 차별적인 관계를 보였고, 정신병리 증상과 가장 많은 관련성을 보인 정서 요인은 수치심인 것으로 나타났다. 연구 결과를 바탕으로 차별적 정서척도의 국내 연구에서의 활용도에 대해 논의하였다.

keywords
정서, 차별적 정서이론, 차별적 정서척도, 신뢰도, 타당도, Emotion, Differential Emotions Theory, Differential Emotions Scale, Reliability, Validity., Emotion, Differential Emotions Theory, Differential Emotions Scale, Reliability, Validity.

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to examine validity and reliability of a Korean version of the Differential Emotions Scale-IV (DES-IV, Izard, Libero, Putnam, & Haynes, 1993). The DES-IV is a self-report questionnaire measuring twelve discrete emotions of joy, enjoyment, surprise, sadness, anger, disgust, fear, guilt, shame, shyness, and hostility inward. A total of 867 undergraduates in Korea participated in the study. Participants completed a set of questionnaires including the Korean version of the DES-IV, Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), Big Five Inventory (BFI), and Symptom Cheklist-90- Revision (SCL-90-R). All twelve emotion factors showed adequate internal consistency, item-total correlations, and test-retest reliability over a week period. In particular, shame, shyness, and hostility inward showed robust temporal stability. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the twelve factor structure of the DES-IV when all factors were correlated each other. The DES-IV factors were adequately related to the positive emotion and negative emotion factors of the PANAS, supporting good convergent and discriminant validity. Finally, differential relationships between emotions and Big Five personality factors, as well as emotions and psychopathology were examined. In conclusion, the DES-IV is a valid measure of twelve discrete emotions in a Korean population.

keywords
정서, 차별적 정서이론, 차별적 정서척도, 신뢰도, 타당도, Emotion, Differential Emotions Theory, Differential Emotions Scale, Reliability, Validity., Emotion, Differential Emotions Theory, Differential Emotions Scale, Reliability, Validity.

참고문헌

1.

김광일, 김재환, 원호택 (1984). 간이정신진단검사 실시요강. 중앙적성출판부.

2.

이현희, 김은정, 이민규 (2003). 한국판 정적 정서 및 부적 정서 척도(Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule; PANAS)의 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 22, 935-946.

3.

홍창희 (2004). 한국 정서경험척도의 개발과 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 23, 771-787.

4.

Blumberg, S. H., & Izard, C. E. (1985). Affective and cognitive characteristics of depression in 10- and 11-year old children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 194-202.

5.

Blumberg, S. H., & Izard, C. E. (1986). Discriminating patterns of emotions in 10- and 11-year-old children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 852-857.

6.

Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1991). Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 316-336.

7.

Derogatis, L. R. (1977). Scl-90 (Revised) Manual Ⅰ. Clinical Psychometrics Research Unit, Baltmore, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

8.

Fedewa, B. A., Burns, L. R., & Gomez, A. A. (2005). Positive and negative perfectionism and the shame/guilt distinction: adaptive and maladaptive characteristics. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1609-1619.

9.

John, O. P., & Gross, J., J, (2007). Individual differences in emotion regulation. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp.351–372). New York: Guilford Press.

10.

Izard, C. E. (1971). The face of emotion. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

11.

Izard, C. E. (1972). Patterns of emotions: A new analysis of anxiety and depression. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

12.

Izard, C. E. (1977). Human emotions. New York: Plenum Press.

13.

Izard, C. E., & Ackerman, B. P. (2000). Motivational, organizational, and regulatory functions of discrete emotions. In M. Lewis, & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (2ndedition, pp.253-264). New York: The Guilford Press.

14.

Izard, C. E., & Blumberg, S. H. (1985). Emotion theory and the role of emotions in anxiety in children and adults. In H. Tuma & J. Maser (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorders (pp.109- 129). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

15.

Izard, C. E., Libero, D. Z., Putnam, P., & Hayes, O. M. (1993). Stability of emotional experiences and their relations to traits of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 847-860.

16.

John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin, & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp.102-138). New York: Guilford Press.

17.

Kim, S., Thibodeau, R., & Jorgensen, R. S. (2011). Shame, guilt, and depressive symptoms: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 68-96.

18.

Kotsch, W. E., Gerbing, D. W., & Schwartz, L. E. (1982). The construct validity of the Differential Emotions Scale as adapted for children and adolescents. In C. Izard (Ed.), Measuring emotions in infants and children (pp. 251-278). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

19.

Larsen, R. J., & Ketelaar, T. (1991). Personality and susceptibility to positive and negative emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 132-141.

20.

Lim, Y-J, Yu, B-H, Kim, D-K, & Kim, J-H (2010). The positive and negative affect schedule: Psychometric properties of the Korean version. Psychiatry Investigation, 7, 163- 169.

21.

Mineka, S., Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1998). Comorbidity of anxiety and unipolar mood disorders. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 377- 412.

22.

Scollon, C. N., Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2005). An experience sampling and cross-cultural investigation of the relation between pleasant and unpleasant affect. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 27-52.

23.

Talbot, J. A., Talbot, N. L., & Tu, X. (2004). Shame-proneness as a diathesis for dissociation in women with histories of childhood sexual abuse. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17, 445-448.

24.

Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. L. (2002). Shame and Guilt. New York: Guilford Publications, Inc.

25.

Tangney, J. P., Wagner, P., & Gramzow, R. (1992). Proneness to shame, proneness to guilt, and psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 469-478.

26.

Tracy, J. L., Robins, R. W., & Tangney, J. P. (2007). The self-conscious emotions: Theory and research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

27.

Watson, D., & Naragon-Gainey, K. (2010). On the specificity of positive emotional dysfunction in psychopathology: Evidence from the mood and anxiety disorders and schizophrenia/schizotypy. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 839-848.

28.

Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219-235.

29.

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Stasik, S. M. (2011). Emotions and the emotional disorders: A quantitative hierarchical perspective. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 11, 429-442.

30.

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.

31.

Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1992). Affects separable and inseparable: On the hierachical arrangement of the negative affects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 489-505.

32.

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1984). Cross-Cultural Convergence in the Structure of Mood: A Japanese Replication and a Comparison With U.S. Findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 127-144.

한국심리학회지: 일반

논문 투고 OA 정책