바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

Effects of Regulatory Focus in Fantasizing Goal Achievement

Korean Journal of Psychology: General / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2012, v.31 no.2, pp.387-398


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The present study investigated the role of regulatory focus in fantasizing goal achievement. Drawing on previous research on fantasy realization and regulatory focus, it was assumed that regulatory focus would affect the content and effect of fantasizing. Specifically, it was expected that in promotion-focused fantasizing, optimistic thoughts would be more prevalent than would obstacle thoughts, and thus the impact of promotion-focused fantasizing in motivating goal-directed behavior would only be weak. In contrast, obstacle thoughts would be more prevalent than optimistic thoughts in prevention-focused fantasizing, and thus the impact of prevention-focused fantasizing in motivating goal-directed behavior would be strong. This hypothesis was tested in an experiment employing college students in Korea. Participants in the promotion focused-fantasy condition freely fantasized their career choice and self-realization in a promotion frame, whereas those in the prevention-focused fantasy condition fantasized their career choice and self-realization in a prevention frame. Using a dual-task paradigm in which participants must allocate their resources effectively and complete the two tasks simultaneously, we found supportive evidence for the research hypothesis. Implications and limitations of the study were discussed.

keywords
Fantasy, Regulatory focus, Positive mood, Motivating goal-directed behavior, 상상, 조절초점, 정적 기분, 목표 행동 동기화

Reference

1.

Boninger, D. S., Krosnick, J. A., & Berent, M. K. (1995). Origins of attitude importance: Self-interest, social identification, and value relevance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 61-80.

2.

Fishbach, A., & Shah, J, A. (2006). Self-control in action: Implicit dispositions toward goals and away from temptations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 802-832.

3.

Higgins, E, T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.

4.

Higgins, E, T. (2000). Making a good decision. American Psychologist, 55, 1217-1230.

5.

Holbrook, A. L., Berent, M. K., Krosnick, J. A., Visser, P. S., & Boninger, D. S. (2005). Attitude importance and the accumulation of attitude-relevant knowledge in memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 749-769.

6.

Idson, L, C., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E, T. (2000). Distinguishing gains from nonlosses and losses from nongainsL A regulatory focus perspective on hedonic intensity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 252-274.

7.

Oettingen, G., & Hagenah, M. (2005). Fantasies and the self regulation of competence. In A. Elliot & C. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 647-665). New-York: Guilford.

8.

Oettingen, G., & Mayer, D. (2002). The motivating function of thinking about the future: Expectations versus fantasies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1198-1212.

9.

Oettingen, G., & Thorpe, J, S. (2006). Fantasy realization and the bridging of time. In L. S. Sanna & E. C. Chang (Eds.), Judgment over time: The interp.ay of toughts, feelings, and behaviors (pp. 120-142). New York: Oxford University Press.

10.

Oettingen, G., Pak, H,, & Schnetter, K. (2001). Self regulation of goal setting: Turning free fantasies about the future into binding goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 736-753.

11.

Spiegel, S., Grant-Pillow, H., & Higgins, E, T. (2004). How regulatory fit enhances motivational strength during goal pursuit. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 39-54.

Korean Journal of Psychology: General