바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

한국판 삶의 만족도 척도의 신뢰도와 타당도: 경찰공무원, 대학생, 청소년을 대상으로

Psychometric Properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale among Korean Police Officers, University Students, and Adolescents

한국심리학회지: 일반 / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2012, v.31 no.3, pp.877-896
임영진 (대구대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

본 연구의 목적은 삶의 만족도 척도(Satisfaction with the Life Scale; SWLS, Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin, 1985)의 한국판을 경찰공무원 516명(남 460, 여 56), 대학생 421명(남 191, 여 230), 청소년 437명(남 223, 여 214)에게 실시하여 한국판 삶의 만족도 척도(Korean version of the Satisfaction with the Life Scale; K-SWLS, 조명한, 차경호, 1998)의 타당도와 신뢰도를 경험적으로 검증하는 것이다. 확인적 요인분석 결과 2요인 구조가 본 자료에 가장 적합한 것으로 나타났다. K-SWLS 척도와 여러 타당도 지표간의 상관분석을 실시한 결과, 척도의 수렴 타당도 또한 확인되었다. 아울러, K-SWLS의 내적 일치도 또한 만족스러웠다. 마지막으로, 본 연구의 의의와 제한점 및 추후 연구 방향이 논의되었다.

keywords
Life Satisfaction, Subjective Well-being, K-SWLS, 삶의 만족도, 주관적 안녕, K-SWLS

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the psychometric properties of 90the Korean version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (K-SWLS) in various samples. In order to examine the psychometric properties of the SWLS three independent and separate samples are included in this study, i.e. police officers (n = 516), university students (n = 421), and adolescents (n = 437). As for the reliability of this instrument, internal consistency and item-total correlation coefficients are found to be satisfactory for all samples. Concerning the validity studies, concurrent validity of the measure is approved in all three samples by showing the association of SWLS with conceptually and empirically related constructs, which are emotional well-being, social well-being, psychological well-being, positive affect and negative affect. Inconsistent with the earliest version, two-factor model was found to be an optimal fit for all samples. The practical and theoretical implications of the current study are discussed.

keywords
Life Satisfaction, Subjective Well-being, K-SWLS, 삶의 만족도, 주관적 안녕, K-SWLS

참고문헌

1.

강찬조 (2012). 경찰공무원의 정신적 웰빙이 직무 만족과 조직 몰입에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 서울시립대학교 박사학위 청구논문.

2.

경찰백서 (2011). 2011 경찰백서. 서울: 경찰청.

3.

임낭연, 이화령, 서은국 (2010). 한국에서의 Diener의 삶의 만족 척도 사용 연구 개관. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 29, 21-47.

4.

임영진, 고영건, 신희천, 조용래 (2012). 정신적 웰빙 척도(MHC-SF)의 한국어판 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 31, 261-278.

5.

조명한, 차경호 (1998). 삶의 질에 대한 국가간 비교. 서울: 집문당.

6.

Anaby, D., Jarus, T., & Zumbo, B. D. (2010). Psychometric evaluation of the Hebrew language version of the satisfaction with life scale. Social Indicators Research, 96, 267-274.

7.

Arrindell, W. A., Heesink, J., & Feij, J. A. (1999). The Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS): Appraisal with 1700 healthy young adults in The Netherlands. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 815-826.

8.

Arrindell, W. A., Meeuwesen, L., & Huyse, F. J. (1991). The Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS): Psychometric properties in a non-psychiatric medical outpatients sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 117- 123.

9.

Atienza, F. L., Pons, D., Balaguer, I., & García- Merita, M. (2000). Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida en adolescentes [Psychometric properties of the Satisfaction With Life Scale in adolescents]. Psicothema, 12, 314-319.

10.

Atienza, F. L., Balaguer, I., & Garcia-Merita, M. L. (2003). Satisfaction with Life Scale: Analysis of factorial invariance across sexes. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1255-1260.

11.

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.

12.

Blais, M. R., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Briere, N. M. (1989). L’Echelle de satisfaction de vie: Validation Canadienne-Francaise du “Satisfaction with Life Scale”(French-Canadian Validation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale). Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 21, 210- 223.

13.

Bonnet, D. G. & Wright, T. A. (2000). Sample size requirements for estimating Pearson, Kendall, and Spearman correlations. Psychometrica, 65, 23-28.

14.

Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modelling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers, New Jersey.

15.

Clench-Aas, J., Nes, R. B., Dalgard, O. S., & Aarø, L. E. (2011). Dimensionality and measurement invariance in the Satisfaction with Life Scale in Norway. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 815-826.

16.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

17.

Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575.

18.

Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71- 75.

19.

Durak, M., Senol-Durak, E., & Gencoz, T. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale among Turkish university students, Correctional officers, and elderly adults. Social Indicators Research, 99, 413-429.

20.

Gilman, R., & Huebner, E. S. (2001). Review of life satisfaction measures for adolescents. Behaviour Change, 17, 178-195.

21.

Gouveia, V. V., Milfont, T. L., Fonseca, P. N., & Coelho, J. A. (2009). Life Satisfaction in Brazil: Testing the psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale (SWLS) in five Brazilian samples. Social Indicators Research, 90, 267-277.

22.

Huebner, E. S. (1994). Preliminary development and validation of a multidimensional life satisfaction scale for children. Psychological Assessment, 6, 149-158.

23.

Hultell, D., & Gustavsson, J. P. (2008). A psychometric evaluation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in a Swedish nationwide sample of university students. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1070-1079.

24.

Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43, 207-222.

25.

Keyes, C. L. M. (2003). Complete mental health: An agenda for the 21st century. In C. L. M. Keyes & J. Haidt (Eds.), Flourishing: Positive Psychology and the Life Well-Lived (pp.293- 312). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.

26.

Keyes, C. L. M., Wissing, M., Potgieter, J., Temane, M., Kruger, A., & van Rooy, S. (2008). Evaluation of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) in Swetsana -speaking South Africans. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 15, 181-192.

27.

Layard, R. (2006). Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. London: Penguin.

28.

Lewis, C. A., Shevlin, M. E., Smekal, V., & Dorahy, M. J. (1999). Factor structure and reliability of a Czech translation of the Satisfaction With Life Scale among Czech university students. Studia Psychologica, 41, 239 -244.

29.

Lim, Y-J., Go, Y-G., Shin, H-C., & Cho, Y-R. (in press). Prevalence and Correlates of Complete Mental Health in the South Korean Adult Population. In C. Keyes (Eds.), Mental Well- Being: International Contributions to the Study of Positive Mental Health. New York: Springer.

30.

Lim, Y-J., Kim, D-K., Yu, B-H., & Kim, J-H. (2010). The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: psychometric properties of the Korean version. Psychiatry Investigation. 7(3), 163-169.

31.

Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 616-628.

32.

Marsaglia, G., Tsang, W. W., & Wang, J. (2003) Evaluating Kolmogorov’s Distribution, Journal of Statistical Software, 8, 1-4.

33.

Martinez, J. C., Martinez, M. R., Garcia, J. C., Cortes, I. O., Ferrer, A. R., & Herrero, B. T. (2004). Fiabilidad y validez de la Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida de Diener en una muestra de mujeres embarazadas y puerperas [Reliability and validity of the Satisfaction With Life Scale of Diener in pregnant and puerperium women]. Psicothema, 16, 448-455.

34.

Meng, X., Rosenthal, R., Rubin, D. B., (1992). Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 172-175.

35.

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2002). Mplus 2.02 [Computer software]. Los Angeles: Muthén and Muthén.

36.

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus user's guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén and Muthén.

37.

Neto, F. (1993). The Satisfaction With Life Scale: Psychometric properties in an adolescent sample. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 22, 125-134.

38.

Neto, F. (2001). Satisfaction with life among adolescents from immigrant families in Portugal. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30, 53-67.

39.

Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

40.

Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2004). The subjective evaluation of well-being in adulthood: Findings and implications. Ageing International, 29, 113- 135.

41.

Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 137-152.

42.

Pons, D., Atienza, F. L., Balaguer, I., & García-Merita, M. L. (2000). Satisfaction With Life Scale: Analysis of factorial invariance for adolescents and elderly persons. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91, 62-68.

43.

Pons, D., Atienza, F. L., Balaguer, I., & García-Merita, M. L. (2002). Propiedades psicometricas de la Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida en personas de tercera edad [Psychometric properties of Satisfaction With Life Scale in elderly]. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicológica, 13, 71-82.

44.

Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069-1081.

45.

Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. (UCLA Statistics Series 260). Los Angeles: University of California, Department of Psychology.

46.

Schimmack, U., Oishi, S., Furr, R. M., & Funder, D. C. (2004). Personality and life satisfaction: A facet-level analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1062-1075.

47.

Schimmack, U., Radhakrishnam, P., Oishi, S., Dzokoto, V., & Ahadi, S. (2002). Culture, personality, and subjective well-being: Integrating process models of life satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 582-593.

48.

Shevlin, M. E., & Bunting, B. P. (1995). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Satisfaction With Life Scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 1316-1318.

49.

Skok, A., Harvey, D., & Reddihough, D. (2006). Perceived stress, perceived social support and wellbeing among mothers of school-aged children with cerebral palsy. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 31(1), 53-57.

50.

Suh, E., Diener, E., & Fujita, F. (1996). Events and subjective well-being: Only recent events matter. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1091-1102.

51.

Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180.

52.

Swami, V., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2008). Psychometric evaluation of the Malay satisfaction with life scale. Social Indicators Research, 92, 25-33.

53.

Tucker, K. L., Ozer, D. J., Lyubomirsky, S., & Boehm, J. K. (2006). Testing for measurement invariance in the satisfaction with life scale: A comparison of Russians and North Americans. Social Indicators Research, 78, 341-360.

54.

Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1-10.

55.

Van Hemert, D. A., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (2002). The Beck depression inventory as a measure of subjective well- being: A cross-national study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 257-286.

56.

Watson, D., Clark, L., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.

57.

Wilkinson, R. B., & Walford, W. A. (1998). The measurement of adolescent psychological health: One or two dimensions? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 27, 443-455.

58.

Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. (2006). Analysis of factorial invariance across gender in the Taiwan version of the satisfaction with life scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1259-1268.

한국심리학회지: 일반